Evidence still insufficient that advance care documentation leads to engagement of healthcare professionals in end-of-life discussions: A systematic review
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online October, 2016
Evidence still insufficient that advance care documentation leads to engagement of healthcare professionals in end-of-life discussions: A systematic review
Administration of non-beneficial life-sustaining treatments in terminal elderly patients still occurs due to lack of knowledge of patient’s wishes or delayed physician–family communications on preference.
Aim:
To determine whether advance care documentation encourages healthcare professional’s timely engagement in end-of-life discussions.
Design:
Systematic review of the English language articles published from January 2000 to April 2015.
Data sources:
EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBM REVIEWS, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library and manual searches of reference lists.
Results:
A total of 24 eligible articles from 10 countries including 23,914 subjects met the inclusion criteria, mostly using qualitative or mixed methods, with the exception of two cohort studies. The influence of advance care documentation on initiation of end-of-life discussions was predominantly based on perceptions, attitudes, beliefs and personal experience rather than on standard replicable measures of effectiveness in triggering the discussion. While health professionals reported positive perceptions of the use of advance care documentations (18/24 studies), actual evidence of their engagement in end-of-life discussions or confidence gained from accessing previously formulated wishes in advance care documentations was not generally available.
Conclusion:
Perceived effectiveness of advance care documentation in encouraging end-of-life discussions appears to be high but is mostly derived from low-level evidence studies. This may indicate a willingness and openness of patients, surrogates and staff to perceive advance directives as an instrument to improve communication, rather than actual evidence of timeliness or effectiveness from suitably designed studies. The assumption that advance care documentations will lead to higher physicians’ confidence or engagement in communicating with patients/families could not be objectively demonstrated in this review.
ParkerMGThorslundM.Health trends in the elderly population: getting better and getting worse. Gerontologist2007; 47(2): 150–158.
2.
RosenMHaglundB.From healthy survivors to sick survivors – implications for the twenty-first century. Scand J Public Health2005; 33(2): 151–155.
3.
CarletJThijsLAntonelliM. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Intensive Care Med2004; 30(5): 770–784.
4.
HillmanKCardona-MorrellM.The ten barriers to appropriate management of patients at the end of their life. Intensive Care Med2015; 41(9): 1700–1702.
5.
JonesDMoranJWintersB. The rapid response system and end-of-life care. Curr Opin Crit Care2013; 19(6): 616–623.
6.
BrueraENeumannCMMazzocatoC. Attitudes and beliefs of palliative care physicians regarding communication with terminally ill cancer patients. Palliat Med2000; 14(4): 287–298.
7.
FallowfieldLJJenkinsVABeveridgeHA.Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative care. Palliat Med2002; 16(4): 297–303.
8.
MackJWWeeksJCWrightAA. End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol2010; 28(7): 1203–1208.
9.
BensonJBrittenN.Respecting the autonomy of cancer patients when talking with their families: qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with patients. BMJ1996; 313(7059): 729–731.
10.
FriisLSElverdamBSchmidtKG.The patient’s perspective: a qualitative study of acute myeloid leukaemia patients’ need for information and their information-seeking behaviour. Support Care Cancer2003; 11(3): 162–170.
11.
RoscoeLATullisJAReichRR. Beyond good intentions and patient perceptions: competing definitions of effective communication in head and neck cancer care at the end of life. Health Commun2013; 28(2): 183–192.
12.
KaplowitzSACampoSChiuWT.Cancer patients’ desires for communication of prognosis information. Health Commun2002; 14(2): 221–241.
13.
DunlaySMStrandJJ.How to discuss goals of care with patients. Trends Cardiovasc Med2016; 26(1): 36–43.
14.
ClaytonJMHancockKMButowPN. Clinical practice guidelines for communicating prognosis and end-of-life issues with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness, and their caregivers. Med J Aust2007; 186(12 Suppl): S77, S79, S83–S108.
15.
JohnstoneM-JKanitsakiO.Ethics and advance care planning in a culturally diverse society. J Transcult Nurs2009; 20(4): 405–416.
TulskyJA.Beyond advance directives: importance of communication skills at the end of life. JAMA2005; 294(3): 359–365.
18.
The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA1995; 274(20): 1591–1598.
19.
KnauftENielsenELEngelbergRA. Barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care communication for patients with COPD. Chest2005; 127(6): 2188–2196.
20.
AlmackKCoxKMoghaddamN. After you: conversations between patients and healthcare professionals in planning for end of life care. BMC Palliat Care2012; 11: 15.
21.
ElkingtonHWhitePHiggsR. GPs’ views of discussions of prognosis in severe COPD. Fam Pract2001; 18(4): 440–444.
22.
MintoFStricklandK.Anticipating emotion: a qualitative study of advance care planning in the community setting. Int J Palliat Nurs2011; 17(6): 278–284.
23.
CurtisJRPatrickDLCaldwellES. Why don’t patients and physicians talk about end-of-life care? Barriers to communication for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians. Arch Intern Med2000; 160(11): 1690–1696.
24.
SulmasyDPDwyerMMarxE.Do the ward notes reflect the quality of end-of-life care. J Med Ethics1996; 22(6): 344–348.
25.
MorrisonRSMorrisonEWGlickmanDF.Physician reluctance to discuss advance directives: an empiric investigation of potential barriers. Arch Intern Med1994; 154(20): 2311–2318.
26.
TierneyWMDexterPRGramelspacherGP. The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients’ satisfaction with primary care. J Gen Intern Med2001; 16(1): 32–40.
AuriemmaCLNguyenCABronheimR. Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence. JAMA Intern Med2014; 174(7): 1085–1092.
37.
SeymourJAlmackKKennedyS.Implementing advance care planning: a qualitative study of community nurses’ views and experiences. BMC Palliat Care2010; 9: 4.
38.
DeteringKMHancockADReadeMC. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ2010; 340: c1345.
39.
PerkinsHS.Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives. Ann Intern Med2007; 147(1): 51–57.
40.
WhiteBTilseCWilsonJ. Prevalence and predictors of advance directives in Australia. Intern Med J2014; 44(10): 975–980.
41.
Lopez-AcevedoMHavrileskyLJBroadwaterG. Timing of end-of-life care discussion with performance on end-of-life quality indicators in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol2013; 130(1): 156–161.
42.
MackJWCroninAKeatingNL. Associations between end-of-life discussion characteristics and care received near death: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol2012; 30(35): 4387–4395.
43.
KalowesP.Improving end-of-life care prognostic discussions: role of advanced practice nurses. AACN Adv Crit Care2015; 26(2): 151–166.
44.
VandervoortAHouttekierDVander SticheleR. Quality of dying in nursing home residents dying with dementia: does advanced care planning matter? A nationwide postmortem study. PLoS ONE2014; 9(3): e91130.
45.
SilveiraMJKimSYLangaKM.Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med2010; 362(13): 1211–1218.
46.
NelsonJEAngusDCWeissfeldLA. End-of-life care for the critically ill: a national intensive care unit survey. Crit Care Med2006; 34(10): 2547–2553.
47.
YouJJDownarJFowlerRA. Barriers to goals of care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families: a multicenter survey of clinicians. JAMA Intern Med2015; 175(4): 549–556.
48.
FagerlinASchneiderCE.Enough: the failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep2004; 34(2): 30–42.
49.
ClaytonJMButowPNTattersallMH. Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care. J Clin Oncol2007; 25(6): 715–723.
50.
O’SullivanRMailoKAngelesR. Advance directives: survey of primary care patients. Can Fam Physician2015; 61(4): 353–356.
51.
AuerbachADKatzRPantilatSZ. Factors associated with discussion of care plans and code status at the time of hospital admission: results from the Multicenter Hospitalist Study. J Hosp Med2008; 3(6): 437–445.
52.
Onwuteaka-PhilipsenBDKaspersPJDeegDJ. Having and discussing preferences on forgoing treatment in the last three months of life of older people with and without an advance directive. Palliat Med2012; 26(4): 656–657 (PMID: 71176784).
53.
PautexSHerrmannFRZulianGB.Role of advance directives in palliative care units: a prospective study. Palliat Med2008; 22(7): 835–841.
54.
SpoelhofGDElliottB.Implementing advance directives in office practice. Am Fam Physician2012; 85(5): 461–466.
55.
DanisMGarrettJHarrisR. Stability of choices about life-sustaining treatments. Ann Intern Med1994; 120(7): 567–573.
56.
FromanRDOwenSV.Randomized study of stability and change in patients’ advance directives. Res Nurs Health2005; 28(5): 398–407.
57.
Barnett-PageEThomasJ.Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol2009; 9: 59.
58.
MeronTAlmackKSeymourJE.Experiences, beliefs and practices of health carer staff associated with the use of advance directives in Israel. Palliat Med2012; 26(4): 503–504.
59.
StoneLKinleyJHockleyJ.Advance care planning in care homes: the experience of staff, residents, and family members. Int J Palliat Nurs2013; 19(11): 550–557 (PMID: 24263899).
60.
PoppeMBurleighSBanerjeeS.Qualitative evaluation of advanced care planning in early dementia (ACP-ED). PLoS ONE2013; 8(4): e60412.
61.
WillmottLWhiteBTilseC. Advance health directives: competing perceptions, intentions and use by patients and doctors in Queensland. QUT L Rev2013; 13: 30.
62.
SnyderSHazelettSAllenK. Physician knowledge, attitude, and experience with advance care planning, palliative care, and hospice: results of a primary care survey. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2013; 30(5): 419–424.
63.
SchererYJezewskiMAGravesB. Advance directives and end-of-life decision making: survey of critical care nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and experience. Crit Care Nurse2006; 26(4): 30–40.
64.
SchiffRSacaresPSnookJ. Living wills and the Mental Capacity Act: a postal questionnaire survey of UK geriatricians. Age Ageing2006; 35(2): 116–121 (PMID: 16414962).
65.
Van OorschotBSimonA. Importance of the advance directive and the beginning of the dying process from the point of view of German doctors and judges dealing with guardianship matters: results of an empirical survey. J Med Ethics2006; 32(11): 623–626.
66.
MasudaYFettersMHattoriA. Physicians’s reports on the impact of living wills at the end of life in Japan. J Med Ethics2003; 29(4): 248–252.
67.
RobinsonLDickinsonCBamfordC. A qualitative study: professionals’ experiences of advance care planning in dementia and palliative care, ‘a good idea in theory but …’. Palliat Med2013; 27(5): 401–408 (PMID: 2013-15268-003).
68.
StewartFGoddardCSchiffR. Advanced care planning in care homes for older people: a qualitative study of the views of care staff and families. Age Ageing2011; 40(3): 330–335.
69.
WilsonESeymourJEPerkinsP.Working with the Mental Capacity Act: findings from specialist palliative and neurological care settings. Palliat Med2010; 24(4): 396–402.
70.
JeongSYHigginsIMcMillanM.The essentials of Advance Care Planning for end-of-life care for older people. J Clin Nurs2010; 19(3–4): 389–397.
71.
TenoJMGruneirASchwartzZ. Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study. J Am Geriatr Soc2007; 55(2): 189–194.
72.
Bern-KlugMGessertCECrennerCW. ‘Getting everyone on the same page’: nursing home physicians’ perspectives on end-of-life care. J Palliat Med2004; 7(4): 533–544 (PMID: 15353097).
73.
BarbourRSSchwartzLThompsonTDB. Health professionals’ views on advance directives: a qualitative interdisciplinary study. Palliat Med2003; 17(5): 403–409.
74.
NakazawaKKizawaYMaenoT. Palliative care physicians’ practices and attitudes regarding advance care planning in palliative care units in Japan: a nationwide survey. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2014; 31(7): 699–709 (PMID: 2014-42573-002).
HildénHMLouhialaPHonkasaloM-L. Finnish nurses’ views on end-of-life discussions and a comparison with physicians’ views. Nurs Ethics2004; 11(2): 165–178.
77.
SchmidtTAHickmanSETolleSW. The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment program: Oregon emergency medical technicians’ practical experiences and attitudes. J Am Geriatr Soc2004; 52(9): 1430–1434.
RheeJJZwarNAKempLA.Why are advance care planning decisions not implemented? Insights from interviews with Australian general practitioners. J Palliat Med2013; 16(10): 1197–1204.
80.
BalabanRB.A physician’s guide to talking about end-of-life care. J Gen Intern Med2000; 15(3): 195–200.
81.
OldJL.Discussing end-of-life care with your patients: the conversation may not be easy but your patients will be grateful. American Academy of Family Physicians, 2008, http://www.aafp.org/fpm/2008/0300/p18.html
82.
ScottIAMitchellGKReymondEJ. Difficult but necessary conversations – the case for advance care planning. Med J Aust2013; 199(10): 662–666.
ChanRJPhillipsJCurrowD.Do palliative care health professionals settle for low-level evidence?Palliat Med2014; 28(1): 8–9.
86.
EscalanteCPMartinCGEltingLS. Medical futility and appropriate medical care in patients whose death is thought to be imminent. Support Care Cancer1997; 5(4): 274–280.
