Contemporary health policies call for consumers to be part of all aspects of service planning, implementation, delivery and evaluation. The extent to which consumers are part of the systemic decision-making levels of palliative care appears to vary between and within services and organisations.
Aim:
The aim of this systematic review is to develop understandings about consumer and carer leadership in palliative care.
Design:
A systematic, narrative synthesis approach was adopted due to the heterogeneity of included studies. The review was registered on PROSPERO prospectively (PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018111625).
Data sources:
PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO were searched for all studies published in English specifically focusing on consumers’ leadership in palliative care organisations and systems. Articles were appraised for quality using a modified JBI-QARI tool.
Results:
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and quality assessment. Consumers are currently involved in leadership of palliative care teaching, research and services. Findings highlight the benefits of consumer leadership in palliative care including more relevant, higher-quality services, teaching and research. Across the included studies, it was not clear the extent to which consumer leaders had influence in relation to setting agendas across the palliative care sector.
Conclusion:
The findings suggest that more could be done to support consumer leadership within palliative care. Academics and clinicians might improve the relevance of their work if they are able to more meaningfully partner with consumers in systemic roles in palliative care.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 2nd ed.Sydney, NSW, Australia: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2017.
2.
ScholzBBockingJPlatania-PhungC, et al. ‘Not an afterthought’: power imbalances in systemic partnerships between health service providers and consumers in a hospital setting. Health Policy2018; 122: 922–928.
NCPC/NHS Centre for Involvement. A guide to involving patients, carers and the public in palliative care and end of life care services. London: Care TNCfP, 2009.
5.
ScholzBBockingJBanfieldM, et al. ‘Coming from a different place’: partnerships between consumers and health services for system change. J Clin Nurs2018; 27: 3622–3629.
6.
ScottDAHGrantSM. A meta-ethnography of the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of patient complaints processes in health-care settings. Health Expect2018; 21: 508–517.
7.
ScholzBBockingJHappellB.Breaking through the glass ceiling: consumers in mental health organisations’ hierarchies. Issues Ment Health Nurs2017; 38: 374–380.
8.
BenziesKMShahVAzizK, et al. The health care system is making ‘too much noise’ to provide family-centred care in neonatal intensive care units: perspectives of health care providers and hospital administrators. Intens Crit Care Nur2018; 50: 44–53.
9.
Health Evidence Network. What are the palliative care needs of older people and how might they be met?Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2004.
10.
Palliative Care Australia, Carers Australia and Consumers Health Forum of Australia. Carer and consumer engagement in palliative care and end-of-life care. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Palliative Care Australia, Carers Australia and Consumers Health Forum of Australia, 2018.
11.
Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association. A model to guide hospice palliative care. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association, 2013.
12.
ScholzBGordonSHappellB.Consumers in mental health service leadership: a systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs2017; 26: 20–31.
13.
StewartSJScholzBGordonS, et al. ‘It depends what you mean by leadership’: an analysis of stakeholder perspectives on consumer leadership. Int J Ment Health Nurs2019; 28: 339–350.
CarersACT. Carer representation terms of reference. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Carers ACT, 2018.
16.
BelangerERodriguezCGroleauD.Shared decision-making in palliative care: a systematic mixed studies review using narrative synthesis. Palliat Med2010; 25: 242–261.
17.
JohnstonBRogersonLMacijauskieneJ, et al. An exploration of self-management support in the context of palliative nursing: a modified concept analysis. BMC Nurs2014; 13.
DzinginaMHigginsonIJ.Public health and palliative care in 2015. Clin Geriatr Med2015; 31: 253–263.
20.
DempersCGottM.Which public health approach to palliative care? An integrative literature review. Prog Palliat Care2016; 25: 1–10.
21.
VerbeekJRuotsalainenJHovingJL.Synthesizing study results in a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health2012; 38: 282–290.
22.
PopayJRobertsHSowdenA, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC methods programme. Lancaster: Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University, 2006.
23.
BraunVClarkeV.Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101.
24.
ArolkerMBarnesJGadoudA, et al. ‘They’ve got to learn’–a qualitative study exploring the views of patients and staff regarding medical student teaching in a hospice. Palliat Med2010; 24: 419–426.
25.
PalLMDixonREFaullCM.Utilising feedback from patients and their families as a learning strategy in a foundation degree in palliative and supportive care: a qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today2014; 34: 319–324.
26.
StephensRJWhitingCCowanK.Research priorities in mesothelioma: a James Lind alliance priority setting partnership. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2015; 89: 175–180.
27.
DavesonBAde Wolf-LinderSWittJ, et al. Results of a transparent expert consultation on patient and public involvement in palliative care research. Palliat Med2015; 29: 939–949.
28.
BreretonLIngletonCGardinerC, et al. Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: methods used in seven European countries. Palliat Med2017; 31: 181–192.
29.
ForbatLHubbardG.Service user involvement in research may lead to contrary rather than collaborative accounts: findings from a qualitative palliative care study. J Adv Nurs2016; 72: 759–769.
30.
BrightonLJKoffmanJHawkinsA, et al. A systematic review of end-of-life care communication skills training for generalist palliative care providers: research quality and reporting guidance. J Pain Symptom Manage2017; 54: 417–425.
31.
CotterellPHarlowGMorrisC, et al. Service user involvement in cancer care: the impact on service users. Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Partici-pation in Health Care and Health Policy2011; 14: 159–169.
32.
GoldSKAbelsonJCharlesCA.From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy2005; 8: 195–209.
33.
LobchukMMcClementSRigneyMCopelandABayrampourH. A Qualitative Analysis of “Naturalistic” Conversations in a Peer-Led Online Support Community for Lung Cancer. Cancer Nurs2015; 38: E21–E31.
34.
BrightonLJPaskSBenaliaH, et al. Taking patient and public involvement online: qualitative evaluation of an online forum for palliative care and rehabilitation research. Res Involv Engagem2018; 4: 14.
35.
HappellBScholzB.Doing what we can but knowing our place: being an ally to promote consumer leadership in mental health. Int J Ment Heal2018; 27: 440–447.
36.
Quality Improvement and Change Management Unit. You Matter: a guideline to support engagement with consumers, carers, communities and clinicians in health. Perth: Western Australian Department of Health, 2017.
37.
Palliative Care Australia. Standards for providing quality palliative care for all Australians. Canberra: Palliative Care Australia, 2005.
38.
ScholzBHappellB.Response to commentary by von Peter to Happell, Brenda, & Scholz, Brett (2018). Doing what we can, but knowing our place: being an ally to promote consumer leadership in mental health. Int J Ment Health Nurs2019; 28: 361–362.
39.
INVOLVE. Guidance on co-producing a research project. Southampton: INVOLVE, 2018.
40.
HappellBWaksSBockingJ, et al. ‘There’s more to a person than what’s in front of you’: nursing students’ experiences of consumer taught mental health education. Int J Ment Health Nurs2019.
41.
PayneSSeymourJMolassiotisA, et al. Benefits and challenges of collaborative research: lessons from supportive and palliative care. BMJ Support Palliat Care2011; 1: 5–11.
