Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

End-of-life care affects both the patient and those close to them. Typically, those close to the patient are not considered within economic evaluation, which may lead to the omission of important benefits resulting from end-of-life care.

Aim:

To develop an outcome measure suitable for use in economic evaluation that captures the benefits of end-of-life care to those close to the dying.

Design:

To develop the descriptive system for the outcome measure, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with the participants and constant comparative analysis methods were used to develop a descriptive system for the measure.

Participants:

Twenty-seven individuals bereaved within the last 2 years or with a close-person currently receiving end-of-life care were purposively recruited into the study. Participants were recruited through newsletters, adverts, snowball sampling and a local hospice.

Results:

Twenty-seven individuals were recruited. A measure of capability with six attributes, each with five levels, was developed based on themes arising from the analysis. Attributes comprise the following: good communication with services, privacy and space to be with the loved one, emotional support, practical support, being able to prepare and cope and being free from emotional distress related to the condition of the decedent.

Conclusion:

This measure is designed to capture the benefits of end-of-life care to close-persons for use in economic evaluation. Further research should value the measure and develop methods for incorporating outcomes for close-persons into economic evaluation.

Keywords

Bereavement capability approach palliative care economic evaluation outcome assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Coast

Kinghorn

Mitchell

The development of capability measures in health economics: opportunities, challenges and progress. Patient 2014, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25074355 (accessed 4 December 2014).

Simon

Anand

Gray

, et al. Operationalising the capability approach for outcome measurement in mental health research. Soc Sci Med 2013; 98: 187–196, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795361300525X (accessed 21 November 2014).

Al-Janabi

Flynn

Coast

Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res 2012; 21: 167–176, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3254872&;tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (accessed 25 May 2014).

Kinghorn

Developing a capability approach to a measure and value quality of life: an application to chronic pain. Norfolk: University of East Anglia, 2010.

Lorgelly

Lorimer

Fenwick

, et al. The capability approach: developing and instrument for evaluating public health interventions. Section of Public Health and Health Policy, University of Glasgow, 2008, http://www.gcph.co.uk/assets/0000/0430/Capabilities_-_full_report__August_08.pdf (accessed 25 May 2014).

Flynn

Huynh

Peters

, et al. Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ 2013, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24254584 (accessed 25 May 2014).

Grewal

Lewis

Flynn

, et al. Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: preferences or capabilities? Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 1891–1901, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953605004454 (accessed 2 June 2014).

Al-Janabi

Coast

Flynn

TN.

What do people value when they provide unpaid care for an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67: 111–121, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953608001664 (accessed 25 June 2014).

Smith

Lorgelly

Al-Janabi

, et al. The capability approach: an alternative evaluation paradigm for health economics? In: Jones

(ed.) The Elgar companion to health economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2012, pp. 415–424.

10.

Coast

Strategies for the economic evaluation of end-of-life care: making a case for the capability approach. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 14: 473–482, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24784902 (accessed 7 October 2014).

11.

The National Council for Palliative Care. Commissioning end of life care, 2006, pp. 1–12, http://www.ncpc.org.uk/sites/default/files/AandE.pdf

12.

Department of Health. End of life care strategy – promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life. Guidance D, 2008, pp. 1–173, http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_086345.pdf

13.

Van den Berg

Lindeboom

Portrait

. Conjugal bereavement effects on health and mortality at advanced ages. J Health Econ 2011; 30: 774–794.

14.

Stroebe

Schut

Stroebe

Health outcomes of bereavement. Lancet 2007; 370: 1960–1973, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673607618169

15.

Williams

JJ.

Depression as a mediator between spousal bereavement and mortality from cardiovascular disease: appreciating and managing the adverse health consequences of depression in an elderly surviving spouse. South Med J 2005; 98, http://journals.lww.com/smajournalonline/Fulltext/2005/01000/Depression_as_a_Mediator_Between_Spousal.25.aspx

16.

Bradbeer

Helme

Yong

, et al. Widowhood and other demographic associations of pain in independent older people. Clin J Pain 2003; 19, http://journals.lww.com/clinicalpain/Fulltext/2003/07000/Widowhood_and_Other_Demographic_Associations_of.8.aspx

17.

Song

Floyd

Seltzer

, et al. Long-term effects of child death on parents’ health related quality of life: a dyadic analysis. Fam Relat 2010; 59: 269–282, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2910450&;tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (accessed 23 May 2014).

18.

Song

Shin

Choi

, et al. Quality of life and mental health in the bereaved family members of patients with terminal cancer. Psychooncology 2012; 21: 1158–1166, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.2027

19.

Rebollo

Alonso

Ramon

, et al. Health-related quality of life during the bereavement period of caregivers of a deceased elderly person. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 501–509, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136–004–5331–5

20.

Boelen

van den Bout

de Keijser

Traumatic grief as a disorder distinct from bereavement-related depression and anxiety: a replication study with bereaved mental health care patients. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 1339–1341.

21.

Laursen

Precht

, et al. Hospitalization for mental illness among parents after the death of a child. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1190–1196, http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa033160

22.

Surtees

In the shadow of adversity: the evolution and resolution of anxiety and depressive disorder. Br J Psychiatry 1995; 166: 583–594.

23.

Easterlin

RA.

Explaining happiness. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003; 100: 11176–11183, http://www.pnas.org/content/100/19/11176.abstract

24.

Broman

Riba

Trahan

MR.

Traumatic events and marital well-being. J Marriage Fam 1996; 58: 908–916, http://www.jstor.org/stable/353979

25.

Blanchflower

Oswald

AJ.

Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J Public Econ 2004; 88: 1359–1386.

26.

Oswald

Powdthavee

Death, happiness, and the calculation of compensatory damages. Journal of Legal Studies 2008; 37: S217–S251.

27.

Clark

Diener

Georgellis

, et al. Lags and leads in life satisfaction: a test of the baseline hypothesis. Econ J 2008; 118: 222–243, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–0297.2008.02150.x

28.

Holdsworth

LM.

Bereaved carers’ accounts of the end of life and the role of care providers in a ‘good death’: a qualitative study. Palliat Med 2015; DOI: 10.1177/0269216315584865, http://pmj.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/05/04/0269216315584865.abstract (accessed 29 July 2015).

29.

NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013, https://www.nice.org.uk/article/PMG9/chapter/5-The-reference-case (accessed 28 July 2014).

30.

PCA. Standards for providing quality care for all Australians. 4th ed., 2005, http://palliativecare.org.au/the-national-standards/

31.

CHPCA. A model to guide hospice palliative care: based on national principles and norms of practice – revised and condensed edition, 2003, http://www.chpca.net/media/319547/norms-of-practice-eng-web.pdf

32.

Hospice New Zealand. Hospice New Zealand standards for palliative care – quality review programme and guide 2012, http://www.hospice.org.nz/resources/standards-for-palliative-care2

33.

Dixon

Walker

Salek

Incorporating carer effects into economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24: 43–53, http://link.springer.com/10.2165/00019053–200624010–00004 (accessed 29 July 2014).

34.

Al-Janabi

Flynn

Coast

, et al. QALYs and carers. Pharmacoeconomics 2011; 29, http://adisonline.com/pharmacoeconomics/Fulltext/2011/29120/QALYs_and_Carers.2.aspx

35.

Brouwer

van Exel

van Gorp

, et al. The CarerQol instrument: a new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 1005–1021, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16900281 (accessed 29 July 2014).

36.

Hoefman

van Exel

Brouwer

Measuring the impact of caregiving on informal carers: a construct validation study of the CarerQol instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 173, http://www.hqlo.com/content/11/1/173 (accessed 4 September 2014).

37.

Van den Berg

Brouwer

Koopmanschap

. Economic valuation of informal care. An overview of methods and applications. Eur J Health Econ 2004; 5: 36–45, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15452763 (accessed 29 July 2014).

38.

Van den Berg

Brouwer

van Exel

, et al. Economic valuation of informal care: the contingent valuation method applied to informal caregiving. Health Econ 2005; 14: 169–183, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15386676 (accessed 29 July 2014).

39.

Goodrich

Kaambwa

Al-Janabi

The inclusion of informal care in applied economic evaluation: a review. Value Health 2012; 15: 975–981, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301512016269 (accessed 4 December 2014).

40.

Haycox

Optimizing decision making and resource allocation in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009; 38: 45–53, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392409005004

41.

NHS. Snapshot review of complaints in end of life care, 2013, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212480/Review_of_complaints_end_of_life_care.pdf (accessed 1 July 2014).

42.

Sutton

Coast

Development of a supportive care measure for economic evaluation of end-of-life care using qualitative methods. Palliat Med 2014; 28: 151–157, http://pmj.sagepub.com/content/28/2/151.short (accessed 25 May 2014).

43.

Coast

Bailey

Canaway

, et al. Measuring and valuing outcomes for care at the end of life: the capability approach. In: Round

(ed.) Care at the end of life. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 89–101.

44.

Edmonton Zone Palliative Care Program. FAMCARE and FAMCARE-2 guidelines of use, 2012, http://palliative.org/NewPC/_pdfs/tools/FAMCAREGuidelines_v20_12Dec2012(2).pdf (accessed 1 July 2014).

45.

Heyland

Cook

Rocker

, et al. The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire. Palliat Med 2010; 24: 682–695, http://pmj.sagepub.com/content/24/7/682.short (accessed 9 October 2014).

46.

Heyland

Jiang

Day

, et al. The development and validation of a shorter version of the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project Questionnaire (CANHELP Lite): a novel tool to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013; 46: 289–297, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392412003983 (accessed 9 October 2014).

47.

Morita

Chihara

Kashiwagi

A scale to measure satisfaction of bereaved family receiving inpatient palliative care. Palliat Med 2002; 16: 141–150, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11969145 (accessed 9 October 2014).

48.

Higginson

Evans

Grande

, et al. Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Med 2013; 11: 111, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741–7015/11/111 (accessed 18 January 2015).

49.

Williams

Should QALYs be programme specific?

J Health Econ 1990; 8: 485–487, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0167629690900307 (accessed 15 October 2014).

50.

Brazier

Deverill

A checklist for judging preference-based measures of health related quality of life: learning from psychometrics. Health Econ 1999; 8: 41–51, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099–1050(199902)8:1<41::AID-HEC395>3.0.CO;2-#/abstract (accessed 29 July 2014).

51.

Farnik

Pierzchała

WA.

Instrument development and evaluation for patient-related outcomes assessments. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2012; 3: 1–7, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3417934&;tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract (accessed 29 July 2014).

52.

Coast

Al-Janabi

Sutton

, et al. Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. Health Econ 2012; 21: 730–741, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21557381 (accessed 29 July 2014).

53.

Stevens

Assessing the performance of a new generic measure of health-related quality of life for children and refining it for use in health state valuation. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2011; 9: 157–169, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21506622 (accessed 29 July 2014).

54.

Coast

Horrocks

Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007; 12: 25–30, http://hsr.sagepub.com/content/12/1/25.abstract (accessed 19 June 2015).

55.

Frank

Snijders

Estimating the size of hidden populations using snowball sampling. J Off Stat 1994; 10: 53–67.

56.

Ingleton

Morgan

Hughes

, et al. Carer satisfaction with end-of-life care in Powys, Wales: a cross-sectional survey. Heal Soc Care Community 2004; 12: 43–52, http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365–2524.2004.00467.x (accessed 3 November 2014).

57.

Ritchie

Lewis

Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE, 2003, http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&;lr=&id=IZ3fJlD5x8gC&pgis=1 (accessed 29 July 2014).

58.

Stevens

Palfreyman

The use of qualitative methods in developing the descriptive systems of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluation. Value Health 2012; 15: 991–998, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23244799 (accessed 29 July 2014).

59.

Hewitt-Taylor

Use of constant comparative analysis in qualitative research. Nurs Stand 2001; 15: 39–42, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12212430 (accessed 30 July 2014).

60.

Strauss

Corbin

Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1990.

61.

Ritchie

Lewis

Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 2013, http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&;lr=&id=EQSIAwAAQBAJ&pgis=1 (accessed 21 August 2014).

62.

QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative analysis software. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: QSR International Pty Ltd, 2012.

63.

Department of Health. More care, less pathway: a review of the Liverpool care pathway for dying patients, 2013, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212450/Liverpool_Care_Pathway.pdf

64.

Cohen

Leis

Kuhl

, et al. QOLLTI-F: measuring family carer quality of life. Palliat Med 2006; 20: 755–767, http://pmj.sagepub.com/content/20/8/755.refs (accessed 1 July 2014).

65.

Dying Matters Coalition. NCPC: dying matters public survey, 2014, http://www.comres.co.uk/poll/1173/ncpc-dying-matters-survey.htm

66.

Grigoryeva

When gender trumps everything: the division of parent care among siblings. Princeton, NJ: Center for the Study of Social Organization, 2014.

67.

University of Birmingham. Evaluation of end of life care (EconEndLife) project, 2015, http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/activity/mds/projects/HaPS/HE/ICECAP/Evaluation-of-End-of-Life-Care/index.aspx

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

Development of a measure (ICECAP-Close Person Measure) through qualitative methods to capture the benefits of end-of-life care to those close to the dying for use in economic evaluation

Abstract

Background:

Aim:

Design:

Participants:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material