Hospice assist at home: does the integration of hospice care in primary healthcare support patients to die in their preferred location – A retrospective cross-sectional evaluation study

Abstract

Background:

A majority of patients prefer to die at home. Specialist palliative care aims to improve quality of life. Hospice assist at home is a Dutch model of general/specialised palliative care within primary care, collaboratively built by general practitioners and a hospice.

Aim:

The aims of this study are to explore whether hospice assist at home service enables patients at hometo express end-of-life preferences and die in their preferred location. In addition, this study provides insight into symptomburden, stability and early referral.

Design:

A retrospective cross-sectional evaluation study was performed (December 2014–March 2015), using hospice assist at home patient records and documentation. Primary outcome includes congruence between preferred and actual place of death. Secondary outcomes include symptom burden, (in)stability and early identification.

Setting/participants:

Between June 2012 and December 2014, 130 hospice assist at home patients, living at home with a life expectancy <1 year, were enrolled. Hospice assist at home, a collaboration between general practitioners, district nurses, trained volunteers and a hospice team, facilitates (1) general practitioner–initiated consultation by Nurse Consultant Hospice, (2) fortnightly interdisciplinary consultations and (3) 24/7 hospice backup for patients, caregivers and professionals.

Results:

A total of 130 patients (62 (48%) men; mean age, 72 years) were enrolled, of whom 107/130 (82%) died and 5 dropped out. Preferred place of death was known for 101/107 (94%) patients of whom 91% patients died at their preferred place of death.

Conclusion:

Hospice assist at home service supports patients to die in their preferred place of death. Shared responsibility of proactive care in primary care collaboration enabled patients to express preferences. Hospice care should focus on local teamwork, to contribute to shared responsibilities in providing optimal palliative care.

Keywords

Palliative care hospice care general practice service integration primary health care patient preference

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Murtagh

Bausewein

Verne

. How many people need palliative care? A study developing and comparing methods for population-based estimates. Palliat Med 2014; 28(1): 49–58.

Gomes

Higginson

Calanzani

. Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 2006–2015.

Higginson

Sen-Gupta

Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med 2000; 3(3): 287–300.

Gomes

Calanzani

Gysels

. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2013; 12: 7.

Evans

Pasman

Donker

. End-of-life care in general practice: a cross-sectional, retrospective survey of ‘cancer’, ‘organ failure’ and ‘old-age/dementia’ patients. Palliat Med 2014; 28(7): 965–975.

World Health Organization. WHO definition of palliative care, http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/ (2002, accessed 18 August 2014).

Hearn

Higginson

IJ.

Do specialist palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients? A systematic literature review. Palliat Med 1998; 12(5): 317–332.

Higginson

Evans

CJ.

What is the evidence that palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients and their families?

Cancer J 2010; 16(5): 423–435.

Davidson

Paull

Introna

. Integrated, collaborative palliative care in heart failure: the St. George Heart Failure Service experience 1999–2002. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2004; 19(1): 68–75.

10.

Plummer

Hearnshaw

Reviewing a new model for delivering short-term specialist palliative care at home. Int J Palliat Nurs 2006; 12(4): 183–188.

11.

Moroni

Zocchi

Bolognesi

. The ‘surprise’ question in advanced cancer patients: a prospective study among general practitioners. Palliat Med 2014; 28(7): 959–964.

12.

Murray

Boyd

Using the ‘surprise question’ can identify people with advanced heart failure and COPD who would benefit from a palliative care approach. Palliat Med 2011; 25(4): 382.

13.

Moss

Lunney

Culp

. Prognostic significance of the ‘surprise’ question in cancer patients. J Palliat Med 2010; 13(7): 837–840.

14.

Oldenmenger

De Raaf

de Klerk

. Cut points on 0–10 numeric rating scales for symptoms included in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in cancer patients: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013; 45(6): 1083–1093.

15.

Abarshi

Onwuteaka-Philipsen

Donker

. General practitioner awareness of preferred place of death and correlates of dying in a preferred place: a nationwide mortality follow-back study in the Netherlands. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009; 38(4): 568–577.

16.

Meehan

Munday

10 years on-has the gold standards framework (gsf) influenced nursing care of patients with end of life care needs in the community?

BMJ Support Palliat Care 2014; 4(1): 120.

17.

Billingham

SJ.

Congruence between preferred and actual place of death according to the presence of malignant or non-malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2013; 3(2): 144–154.

18.

De Roo

Miccinesi

Onwuteaka-Philipsen

. Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: making sense of quality indicators. PloS ONE 2014; 9(4): e93762.

19.

De Korte-Verhoef

Pasman

Schweitzer

. General practitioners’ perspectives on the avoidability of hospitalizations at the end of life: a mixed-method study. Palliat Med 2014; 28(7): 949–958.

20.

Beccaro

Miccinesi

. Awareness of general practitioners concerning cancer patients’ preferences for place of death: evidence from four European countries. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49(8): 1967–1974.

21.

Bell

Somogyi-Zalud

Masaki

KH.

Factors associated with congruence between preferred and actual place of death. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010; 39(3): 591–604.

22.

De Graaf

Zweers

De Graeff

. Does age influence symptom prevalence and intensity in hospice patients, or not. A retrospective cohort study. J Geriatr Palliat Care 2014: S(1): 7.

23.

Gardiner

Gott

Ingleton

Factors supporting good partnership working between generalist and specialist palliative care services: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2012; 62(598): e353–e362.