Palliative care and other physicians’ knowledge,attitudes and practice relating to the law on withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Survey results

Abstract

Background:

To effectively care for people who are terminally ill, including those without decision-making capacity, palliative care physicians must know and understand the legal standing of Advance Care Planning in their jurisdiction of practice. This includes the use of advance directives/living wills and substitute decision-makers who can legally consent to or refuse treatment if there is no valid advance directive.

Aim:

This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of medical specialists most often involved in end-of-life care in relation to the law on withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from adults without decision-making capacity.

Design/participants:

A pre-piloted survey was posted to specialists in palliative, emergency, geriatric, renal and respiratory medicine; intensive care; and medical oncology in three Australian States. Surveys were analysed using SPSS 20 and SAS 9.3.

Results:

The overall response rate was 32% (867/2702) – 52% from palliative care specialists. Palliative care specialists and geriatricians had significantly more positive attitudes towards the law ( $χ_{42}^{2} = 94.352$ ; p < 0.001) and higher levels of knowledge about the withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment law ( $χ_{7}^{2} = 30.033$ ; p < 0.001) than did the other specialists, while still having critical gaps in their knowledge.

Conclusion:

A high level of knowledge of the law is essential to ensure that patients’ wishes and decisions, expressed through Advance Care Planning, are respected to the maximum extent possible within the law, thereby according with the principles and philosophy of palliative care. It is also essential to protect health professionals from legal action resulting from unauthorised provision or cessation of treatment.

Keywords

Advance healthcare planning law palliative care treatment refusal withdrawing/withholding life-sustaining treatment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/ (accessed 24 January 2015).

Hughes

. What does palliative care need and does dementia need it? In: Keynote presentation, Alzheimer’s Australia conference, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 4 June 2009.

Rothschild

. Part II: physician-assisted dying: an Australian perspective. In: Birnbacher

Dahl

(eds) Giving death a helping hand (Volume 38: International Library of Ethics, Law and the New Medicine). Dordrecht: Springer, 2008, pp. 97–112.

Frost

Cook

Heyland

. Patient and healthcare professional factors influencing end-of-life decision-making during critical illness: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2011; 39(5): 1174–1189.

Wendler

Rid

. Systematic review: the effects on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154(5): 336–346.

White

Braddock

Bereknyei

. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in Intensive Care Units: opportunities for improvement. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167(5): 461–467.

Willmott

White

Then

. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment. In: White

McDonald

Willmott

(eds) Health law in Australia, 2nd ed. Pyrmont, NSW, Australia: Thomson Reuters, 2014, pp. 543–592.

Jox

Michalowski

Lorenz

. Substitute decision making in medicine: comparative analysis of the ethico-legal discourse in England and Germany. Med Health Care Philos 2008; 11: 153–163.

Silveira

Kim

SYH

Langa

. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1211–1218.

10.

Herring

. Chapter 4: consent to treatment. In: Herring

(ed.) Medical law and ethics, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 149–220.

11.

Herring

. Chapter 9: dying and death. In: Herring

(ed.) Medical law and ethics, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 472–562.

12.

Meisel

Cerminara

Pope

. The right to die: the law of end-of-life decision making, 3rd ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.

13.

Pope

. Legal fundamentals of surrogate decision making. Chest 2012; 141(4): 1074–1081.

14.

Gilmour

. Chapter 9. Death, dying and decision-making about end of life care. In: Downie

Caulfield

Flood

(eds) Canadian health law and policy, 4th ed. Toronto, ON, Canada: LexisNexis, 2011, pp. 385–486.

15.

Dutch Medical Treatment Act. Wijzigingswet Burgerlijk Wetboek enz.(geneeskundige behandelingsovereenkomst) http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0007021/geldigheidsdatum_17-11-2009/informatie (Geldend op 12 January 2015).

16.

Manalo

MFC

. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: euthanasia or acceptable medical practice? FEU-NRMF Med J 2011; 17(2): 68–78.

17.

White

Willmott

Trowse

. The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment: part 1 (New South Wales). J Law Med 2011; 18(3): 498–522.

18.

McCrary

Swanson

Coulehan

. Physicians’ legal defensiveness in end-of-life treatment decisions: comparing attitudes and knowledge in States with different laws. J Clin Ethics 2006; 17(1): 15–26.

19.

Cartwright

Shaw

. Chapter 21: end of life care. In: Caplan

(ed.) Geriatric medicine: an introduction. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: IP Communications, 2014, pp. 319–337.

20.

White

Willmott

Cartwright

. Doctors’ knowledge of the law on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment. Med J Aust 2014; 201(4): 229–232.

21.

Willmott

White

Parker

. The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment: part 3 (Victoria). J Law Med 2011; 18(4): 773–797.

22.

Willmott

White

Parker

. The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment: part 2 (Queensland). J Law Med 2011; 18(3): 523–544.

23.

Cartwright

Onwuteaka-Philipsen

William

. Physician discussions with terminally ill patients: a cross-national comparison. Palliat Med 2007; 21: 295–303.

24.

Gauntlett

Laws

. Communication skills in critical care. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2008; 8(4): 121–124.

25.

Van der Burg

. Bioethics and law: a developmental perspective. Bioethics 1997; 11(2): 91–114.

26.

White

Malvar

Karr

. Expanding the paradigm of the physician’s role in surrogate decision-making: an empirically derived framework. Crit Care Med 2010; 38(3): 743–750.

27.

Schildmann

Doyal

Cushing

. Decisions at the end of life: an empirical study on the involvement, legal understanding and ethical views of preregistration house officers. J Med Ethics 2006; 32(10): 567–570.

28.

Stark Toller

Budge

. Compliance with and understanding of advance directives among trainee doctors in the United Kingdom. J Palliat Care 2006; 22(3): 141–146.

29.

Hardin

Yusufaly

. Difficult end-of-life treatment decisions: do other factors trump advance directives? Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1531–1533.

30.

Darvall

McMahon

Piterman

. Medico-legal knowledge of general practitioners: disjunctions, errors and uncertainties. J Law Med 2001; 9(2): 167–184.

31.

Carver

Vickrey

Bernat

. End-of-life care: a survey of US neurologists’ attitudes, behavior, and knowledge. Neurology 1999; 53(2): 284–293.

32.

Corke

Milnes

Orford

. The influence of medical enduring power of attorney and advance directives on decision-making by Australian intensive care doctors. Crit Care Resusc 2009; 11(2): 122–128.

33.

Wong

Weiland

Jelinek

. Emergency clinicians’ attitudes and decisions in patient scenarios involving advance directives. Emerg Med J 2012; 29(9): 720–724.

34.

Weiner

Cole

. Three principles to improve clinician communication for advance care planning: overcoming emotional, cognitive and skill barriers. J Palliat Med 2004; 7(6): 817–829.