Recent reviews conclude that the benefits of attending Specialist Palliative Day Care (SPDC) are likely to be in social, psychological and spiritual domains. However, these areas are not easily identified, leaving researchers and practitioners unclear as to what aspects of these domains patients most need and desire. The objective of this review was to systematically evaluate literature on patient-perceived psychosocial experiences of attendance at SPDC. Twelve studies were included. Evidence showed that patients value a person-centred approach that reduces isolation, increases social support, encourages communication and provides activities. Future research could focus on investigating why patients value the psychosocial experiences reported and how these experiences can be defined in a way that would be meaningful to clinical service commissioners. Once this has been done, clinicians can start to measure more effectively clinical effectiveness and devise justifiable interventions to help this patient group.
HalliganPWAylwardM. The power of belief: Psychosocial influence on illness, disability and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
2.
Lloyd-WilliamsM. Psychosocial issues in palliative care, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
3.
National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Services. Commissioning through partnership. Palliat Care2000; 1: 1–1.
4.
Gyles M and Higginson IJ. Guidance on cancer services. Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. Research evidence. London: Nice Institute for Clinical Evidence, 2004.
5.
DaviesEHigginsonIJ. Systemic review of specialist palliative day-care for adults with cancer. Support Care Cancer2005; 13: 607–627.
6.
MacFarlaneTVGlennyA-MWorthingtonHV. A systematic review of population based epidemiological studies of oro-facil pain. J Dent2001; 29: 451–467.
7.
PopeCMaysN. Qualitative research in health care, 2nd edn. London: BMJ books, 2001.
8.
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews, 2nd ed. Report Number 4. York: NHS CRD, 2001.
9.
Dixon-WoodsMFitzpatrickR. Qualitative research in systematic reviews: Has established a place for itself. Editorials. Br Med J2001; 232: 765–766.
10.
HammersleyM. What’s wrong with ethnography: methodological explorations. London: Routledge, 1992.
11.
BarbourRS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?Br Med J2001; 322: 1115–1117.
Gibson A. Creativity in hospice- a celebration of achievement. Occup Ther News 1995; 3: 4–5.
15.
ByassR. Auditing complementary therapies in palliative care: the experience of the day-care massage service at Mount Edgcumbe Hospice. Compl Ther Nurs Midwifery1999; 5: 51–60.
16.
CornerJCawleyNSheenaH. An evaluation of the use of massage and essential oils on the wellbeing of cancer patients. Int J Palliat Nurs1995; 1: 67–73.
17.
CorrCCorrD. Adult hospice day care. Death Stud1992; 16: 155–155.
18.
DemongSA. Provision of recreational activities in hospices in the US. Hospice J1997; 12: 56–67.
19.
DouglasHHigginsonIJMyersKNormandC. Assessing structure, process and outcome in palliative day care: a pilot study for a multicentre trial. Health Soc Care Community2000; 8: 336–344.
20.
DouglasHNormandCHigginsonIJGoodwinD. A new approach to eliciting patients’ preferences for palliative day care: the choice experiment method. J Pain Symptom Manag2005; 29: 435–445.
21.
EdwardsALivingstoneHDaleyA. Does hospice care need doctors?Palliat Care Today1997; 6: 36–37.
22.
EvesASmithA. Palliative care services in Britain and Ireland. Palliat Med1994; 8: 19–27.
23.
HigginsonIJHearnJMyersKNaysmithA. Palliative day care: what do services do?Palliat Med2000; 14: 277–286.
24.
KennetCHarmerLTaskerM. Bring the arts to the bedside. Eur J Palliat Care2004; 11: 254–256.
25.
LewisRVediaAReuerBSchwanRTourinC. Integrating complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) into standard hospice and palliative care. Am J Hospice Palliat Care2003; 20: 221–228.
26.
McLoughlin D. Creative writing in hospice. Hospice Bull 1995; October: 8–9.
27.
NobleSHargreavesP. Hospice day care. Eur J Palliat Care2002; 9: 153–155.
28.
PhearDN. A study of animal companionship in a day hospice. Palliat Med1996; 10: 336–338.
29.
HolmesJ. The changing face of the day hospice. Eur J Palliat Care2001; 8: 166–169.
30.
ScanlonC. Creating a vision of hope: the challenge of palliative care. Oncol Nurs Forum1989; 16: 491–496.
31.
SeeleyS. Why hospice day care?Am J Hospice Care1990; 7: 16–17.
32.
SharmaKOliverDBlatchfordGHigginbottomPKahnV. Medical Care in hospice day care. J Palliat Care1993; 9: 42–43.
33.
StevesE. Promoting self worth in the terminally ill. Eur J Palliat Care1996; 3: 60–64.
34.
ThompsonB. Hospice day Care. Am J Hospice Care1990; 7: 28–30.
35.
PayneM. Social objectives in cancer care: the example of palliative day care. Eur J Cancer Care2006; 15: 440–447.
36.
GoodwinDMHigginsonIJMyersKDouglasHRNormandCE. What is palliative day care? A patient’s perspective of five UK services. Support Cancer Care2002; 10: 556–562.
37.
KernohanGWHassonFHutchinsonPCochraneB. Patient satisfaction with hospice day care. Support Cancer Care2006; 14: 462–468.
38.
FisherCO’ConnorMAbelK. The role of palliative day care in supporting patients: a therapeutic community space. Int J Palliat Nurs2008; 14: 117–125.
39.
Langley-EvansAPayneS. Light-hearted death talk in a palliative day care context. J Adv Nurs1997; 26: 1091–1097.
40.
LowJPerryRWilkinsonS. A qualitative evaluation of the impact of palliative care day services: the experience of patients, informal carers, day unit managers and volunteer staff. Palliat Med2005; 19: 65–70.
41.
KennetCE. Participation in a creative arts project can foster hope in a hospice day centre. Palliat Med2000; 14: 419–425.
42.
CheesmanSChristianRCresswellJ. Exploring the value of shiatsu in palliative care day services. Int J Palliat Nurs2001; 7: 234–239.
43.
HopkinsonJBHallettCE. Patients’ perceptions of hospice day care: a phenomenological study. Int J Nurs Stud2001; 38: 117–125.
44.
KennettCPayneM. Understanding why palliative care patients ‘like day care’ and ‘getting out’. J Palliat Care2005; 21: 292–298.
45.
DiverFMolassiotisAWeeksL. The palliative care needs of ethnic minority patients attending a day care centre: a qualitative study. Int J Palliat Nurs2003; 9: 389–396.
46.
LeeL. Interprofessional working in hospice day care and the patients’ experience of the service. Int J Palliat Nurs2002; 8: 389–400.
47.
ShawB. ‘Parting gifts’. Palliative care patients perceptions of making sculpture. Palliat Care Today1999; 8: 36–37.
48.
ParsonT. Action Theory and the Human Condition. New York: The Free Press, 1978.
49.
LarsenRBussD. Personality Psychology: Domains of Knowledge about Human Nature. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
50.
ThompsonS. Illusions of control: How we overestimate our personal influence. Curr Dir Psychol Sci1999; 8: 187–190.
51.
RyanRMDeciEL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. Am Psychol2000; 55: 68–78.
52.
BrehmSBrehmJ. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
53.
SmithEMackieD. Social Psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Psychology Press Ltd, 2000.
54.
BrunsteinJGollwitzerP. Effects of failure on subsequent performance: the importance of self defining goals. J Pers Soc Psychol1996; 70: 395–407.
55.
DeciELRyanRM. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychol Inq2000; 11: 227–268.
56.
RathusSNevidJ. Adjustment and Growth: The Challenges of Life. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1995.
57.
McAdamsDP. Motives. In: DerlegaVWinsteadBJonesW (eds) Contemporary Research in Personality. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 1990, 175–204.
58.
HouseJS. Work stress and Social Support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981.
59.
BuunkBGibbonsF. Health, Coping and Well-Being. Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
60.
FioreJCoppelDBeckerJCoxG. Social support as a multifaceted concept: examination of important dimensions for adjustment. Am J Community Psychol1986; 14: 93–111.
61.
MartinRLefcourtH. Sense of humour as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. J Pers Soc Psychol1983; 45: 1212–1324.
62.
HomansG. Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1961.
63.
CarverCScheierM. Perspectives on Personality, 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2004.
64.
AronsonEWilsonTAkertR. Social Psychology, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2004.
65.
McClellandDAtkinsonJClarkRLowellE. The Achievement Motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.
66.
PattisonEM. The Experience of Dying. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
67.
CarverCScheierM. Adapting to cancer: the importance of hope and purpose. In: BaumAAndersenB (eds) Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2001, 15–36.
68.
ScottJWilliamsMBeckA. Cognitive Therapy in Clinical Practice: An Illustrative Casebook. London: Routledge, 1991.
69.
FolkmanSLazarusRSDunkel-SchetterCDelongisAGruenRJ. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol1986; 48: 992–1003.
70.
GreerS. Psychological responses to cancer. Psychol Med1991; 21: 43–49.
71.
BackmanKLAustinJK. Causal attribution, perceived control, and adjustment in patients with lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum1993; 20: 23–30.
72.
LaveryJClarkeV. Casual attributions, coping strategies and adjustment to breast cancer. Cancer Nurs1996; 19: 20–28.
73.
HopsonBAdamsJ. Towards an understanding of transition: defining some boundaries of transition dynamics. In: AdamsJHayesHHopsonB (eds) Transition: Understanding and Managing Personal Change. London: Martin Robertson, 1976, 3–25.
74.
ClassenCCDavidAThompsonKSmithCLeaSFahyT. Coping styles associated with psychological adjustment to advanced breast cancer. Health Psychol1996; 15: 434–437.
