A comparison of palliative care outcome measures used to assess the quality of palliative care provided in long-term care facilities: a systematic review

Abstract

Provision of palliative care in long-term care (LTC) facilities is important, but limited research has been undertaken to investigate the most appropriate outcome measure for use in this setting. In this systematic review we aimed to measure the psychometric properties (reliability/validity) and feasibility of palliative outcome measures used to assess the quality of palliative care provided in LTC. For identification of outcome measures we undertook systematic searches of electronic databases from 1 January 2000 to 12 September 2008. Included studies were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological quality prior to inclusion in the review using an appraisal checklist developed for the review to evaluate validity, reliability and feasibility. Ten articles were included in the final review and these provided specific information on the psychometric properties of 10 outcome measures. Four of these measures reported data specifically for residents in LTC facilities, while the remaining six measures reported a sub-set of data for residents in LTC facilities. The Family Perceptions of Care Scale is considered by the authors as the most suitable outcome measure for use in LTC facilities. Of the remaining nine measures, a further two were also considered suitable for measuring the quality of palliative care in residential aged care facilities. These are the Quality of Dying in Long-term Care scale and the Toolkit Interview.

Keywords

Long-term care outcome measure psychometric properties systematic review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Commonwealth of Australia. Guidelines for a palliative approach in residential aged care facilities - NHMRC endorsed edition. Canberra 2006.

Mularski

Shugarman

Lynn

. A systematic review of measurs of end-of-life care and its outcomes. Health Serv Res 2007; 42(5): 1848–1870.

The Toolkit at the End of Life. http://www.chcr.brown.edu/pcoc/toolkit.htm (2008) 5/4/2009.

Hearn

Higginson

. Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: a review. J Public Health 1997; 19(2): 193–199.

Mayland

Williams

Ellershaw

. How well do current instruments using bereaved relatives' views evalute care for dying patients? Palliat Med 2008; 22: 133–144.

Mularski

Rosenfeld

Coons

. Measuring outcomes in randomized prospective trials in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manag 2007; 34: S7–S19.

Aspinal

Addington-Hall

Hughes

Higginson

. Using satisfaction to measure the quality of palliative care: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2003; 42: 324–339.

Moss

Shugarman

Lorenz

Mularski

Lynn

. A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the End of Life. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56: 124–129.

Parker-Oliver

Porock

Zweig

. End-of-life care in U.S. nursing homes: a review of the evidence. J Am Med Directors Assoc 2004; 5: 147–155.

10.

Lorenz K, Morton S, Mularski R, et al. End-of-Life Care and Outcomes. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 110 (Prepared by the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Centre, under Contract No 290-02-003). Rockville 2004.

11.

Zwakhalen S, Hamers J, Abu-Saad, H, Berger M 2006 Pain in elderly people with severe dementia: A systematic review of behavioural pain assessment tools. BMC Geriatrics doi: 10.1186/147-2318-6-3.

12.

Chan

Pang

. Quality of life concerns and end-of-life care preferences of aged persons in long term care facilities. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16: 2158–2166.

13.

Ettema

Droes

de Lange

Mellenbergh

Ribbe

. QUALIDEM: development and evaluation of a dementia specific quality of life instrument–validation. Int J Geriatr Psychiat 2007; 22: 424–430.

14.

Ettema

Droes

de Lange

Mellenbergh

Ribbe

. QUALIDEM: development and evaluation of a dementia specific quality of life instrument. Scalability, reliability and internal structure. Int J Geriatr Psychiat 2007; 22: 549–556.

15.

Ettema

Hensen

De Lange

Droes

Mellenbergh

Ribbe

. Self report on quality of life in dementia with modified COOP/WONCA charts. Aging Ment Health 2007; 11: 734–742.

16.

Hickman

Tilden

Tolle

. Family perceptions of worry, symptoms and suffering in the dying. J Palliat Care 2004; 20: 20–27.

17.

Hoe

Katona

Roch

Livingston

. Use of the QOL-AD for measuring quality of life in people with severe dementia–the LASER-AD study. Age Ageing 2005; 34: 130–135.

18.

Mayland

Williams

Ellershaw

. How well do current instruments using bereaved relatives' views evaluate care for dying patients? Palliat Med 2008; 22: 133–144.

19.

Merchant

Hope

. The Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease Scale: direct assessment of people with cognitive impairment. J Clin Nurs 2004; 13: 105–110.

20.

Thompson

Chochinov

. Methodological challenges in measuring quality care at the end of life in the long-term care environment. J Pain Symptom Manag 2006; 32: 378–391.

21.

Thorgrimsen

Selwood

Spector

. Whose quality of life is it anyway? The validity and reliability of the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2003; 17: 201–208.

22.

Volicer

Hurley

Blasi

. Scales for evaluation of End-of-Life Care in Dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2001; 15: 194–200.

23.

De Von

Block

Moyle-Wright

. A Psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarship 2007; 39: 155–164.

24.

Cronhach

. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334.

25.

Cohen

. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37–46.

26.

Brandt

Deliens

van der Stern

Ribbe

van der Wal

. The last days of life of nursing home patients with and without dementia assessed with the Palliative care Outcome Scale. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 334–342.

27.

Kiely

Volicer

Teno

Jones

Prigerson

Mitchell

. The validity and reliability of scales for the evaluation of end-of-life care in advanced dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2006; 20: 176–181.

28.

Munn

Zimmerman

Hanson

. Measuring the quality of dying in long-term care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55: 1371–1379.

29.

Vohra

Brazil

Hanna

Abelson

. Family percpetions of end-of-life care in long-term care facilities. J Palliat Care 2004; 20: 297–302.

30.

Casarett

Pickard

Bailey

. A nationwide VA palliative care quality measure: the family assessment of treatment at the end of life. J Palliat Med 2008; 11: 6875–6875.

31.

Chan

Pang

. Applicability of the modified Quality-of-Life Concers in the End of Life Questionnaire (mQOLC-E) for frail older people. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 2008; 3: 126–132.

32.

Curtis

Patrick

Engelberg

Norris

Asp

Byock

. A measure of quality of dying and death: initial validation using after death interviews with family members. J Pain Symptom Manag 2002; 24: 17–31.

33.

Pang

SMC

Chan

Chung

BPM

. Assessing quality of life of patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the end of life. J Palliat Care 2005; 21: 180–187.

34.

Steel

Ljunggren

Topinkova

. The RAI-PC: an assessment instrument for palliative care in all settings. Am J Hospice Palliat Care 2003; 20: 211–219.

35.

Teno

Clarridge

Casey

Edgman-Levitan

Fowler

. Validation of Toolkit After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview. J Pain Symptom Manag 2001; 22: 752–758.

36.

Steinhauser

Clipp

Bosworth

. Measuring quality of life at the end of life: validation of the QUAL-E. Palliat Support Care 2004; 2: 3–14.

37.

Richardson

Medina

Richardson

Sitzia

Brown

. Patients’ needs assessment tools in cancer care: principles and practice. London: Kings College, 2005.

38.

McPherson

Addington-Hall

. Judging the quality of care at the end of life: can proxies provide reliable information? Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 95–109.