Implementation and impact of the Gold Standards Framework in community palliative care: a qualitative study of three primary care trusts

Abstract

The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) has been widely adopted within UK general practices, yet there is little understanding of its impact on the provision of community palliative care services. This study presents data on the anticipation and adoption of the GSF within three Primary Care Trusts in North West England. Forty-seven interviews were conducted with generalist and specialist palliative and primary care professionals. Important aspects of the GSF identified were the patient register, communication and out-of-hours protocols. Positive benefits to professionals included improved communication between professionals and appropriate anticipatory prescribing. Negative aspects included increased nursing workload and the possibility of fewer or later visits for patients. Many respondents believed that the GSF needed local champions to be sustainable. Slow or incomplete adoption was reported. The GSF was recognised as important because it facilitated changes to previously difficult aspects of work between professionals, but few respondents reported direct benefits to patient care.

Keywords

home care services interdisciplinary communication palliative care physicians family primary health care qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Kendall M Boyd K Campbell C Cormie P Fife S Thomas K . How do people with cancer wish to be cared for in primary care? Serial discussion groups of patients and carers. Fam Pract 2006; 23: 644–650.

2 Exley C Field D Jones L Stokes T . Palliative care in the community for cancer and end-stage cardiorespiratory disease: the views of patients, lay-carers and health care professionals. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 76–83.

3 Addington-Hall J McCarthy M . Dying from cancer: results of a national population-based investigation. Palliat Med 1995; 9: 295–305.

5 Henry C Fenner F . An introduction to the NHS end of life care programme. End Life Care 2007; 1: 56–60.

6 National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) . Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer-the manual. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2004.

7 Department of Health . Our health, our care, our say. London: The Stationary Office; 2006.

8 Department of Health . Quality and outcomes framework. Guidance. London: Department of Health; 2004.

9 Thomas K Noble B . Improving the delivery of palliative care in general practice: an evaluation of the first phase of the Gold Standards Framework. Palliat Med 2007; 21: 49–53.

10.

10 King N Thomas K Martin N Bell D Farrell S . 'Now nobody falls through the net': practitioners' perspectives on the Gold Standards Framework for community palliative care. Palliat Med 2005; 19: 619–627.

11.

11 Munday D Mahmood K Argarwal S Dale J Koistinen J Lamb K . Evaluation of the Macmillan Gold Standards Framework for palliative care (GSF) phases 3–6. 2003–2005. Palliat Med 2006; 20: 134.

12.

12 Munday D Mahmood K Dale J King N . Facilitating good process in primary palliative care: does the Gold Standards Framework enable quality performance. Fam Pract 2007; 24: 486–494.

13.

13 Mahmood-Yousuf K Munday D King N Dale J . Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58: 256–263.

14.

14 Walshe C Chew-Graham C Todd C Caress A . What influences referrals within community palliative care services? A qualitative case study. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67: 137–146.

15.

15 Walshe C Todd C Caress A Chew-Graham C . Judgements about fellow professionals and the management of patients receiving palliative care in primary care: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58: 264–272.

16.

16 Walshe CE Caress AL Chew-Graham C Todd CJ . Case studies: a research strategy appropriate for palliative care. Palliat Med 2004; 18: 677–684.

17.

17 Yin RK . Case study research. Design and method. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003.

18.

18 Ritchie J Spencer L . Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: A Bryman RG Burgess , (eds), Analysing qualitative data. London: Routeledge; 1994.

19.

19 Street A Blackford J . Communication issues for the interdisciplinary community palliative care team. J Clin Nurs 2001; 10: 643–650.

20.

20 Grol R Grimshaw J . From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003; 362: 1225–1230.

21.

21 Woolf SH Grol R Hutchinson A Eccles M Grimshaw J . Potential benefits, limitations and harms of clinical guidelines. Br Med J 1999; 318: 527–530.

22.

22 Munday D Dale J Barnett M . Out of hours palliative care in the UK: perspectives from general practice and specialist services. J R Soc Med 2002; 95: 28–30.

23.

23 Shipman C Addington-Hall J Barclay S Briggs J Cox I Daniels L . Providing palliative care in primary care: how satisfied are GPs and district nurses with current out-of-hours arrangements. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 477–478.

24.

24 Barclay SIG Todd CJ Grande G Lipscombe J . Controlling cancer pain in primary care: the prescribing habits and knowledge base of general practitioners. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002; 23: 383–392.

25.

25 Bliss J Cowley S While A . Interprofessional working in palliative care in the community: a review of the literature. J Interprof Care 2000; 14: 281–290.

26.

26 Munday D Dale J . Palliative care in the community. Br Med J 2007; 334: 809–810.