Setting handicap goals with elderly people: a pilot study of the Life Strengths Interview

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether the Life Strengths Interview (LSI) is a useful clinical framework to identify handicap goals.

Design: Clinical case studies.

Settings: Two elderly care rehabilitation hospitals.

Subjects: Five people, whose ages ranged from 73 to 90 years. All participants were aware of their likely resultant disability, scored 25+ out of a possible 30 with the Mini-Mental State Examination, were able to communicate effectively and were due to be discharged home in approximately one month.

Interventions: Each participant undertook the LSI process with the research occupational therapist.

Main outcome measures: Identified rehabilitation goals and their achievement.

Results: Goals were focused around families and other support networks. Six to eight weeks following discharge, achievement of goals varied.

Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that the LSI may be a useful clinical framework but further research needs to investigate whether a modified clinical version may be more suitable.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fugl-Meyer AR , Branholm IB , Fugl-Meyer KS Happiness and domain-specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clin Rehabil 1991 ; 5: 25-33.

Forster A. , Young J.

Stroke rehabilitation: can we do better?

Br Med J 1992; 305: 1466-70.

Greveson G. , James O. Improving long-term outcome after stroke - the views of patients and carers . Health Trends 1991; 23: 161-62.

Driessen MJ , Dekker J. A survey study of occupational therapy in The Netherlands. Paper (0036) given at the 11th Congress of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists, London 1994 .

Schut HA , Stam HJ Goals in rehabilitation teamwork. Disabil Rehabil 1994; 16: 223-26.

McGrath JR , Davis AM

Rehabilitation: where are we going and how do we get there?

Clin Rehabil 1992; 6: 225-35.

World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: WHO, 1980.

Harwood RH , Rogers A. , Dickinson E. , Ebrahim S.

Measuring handicap: the London handicap scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual

Health Care 1994; 3: 11-16.

Thompson P. 'I don't feel old': subjective ageing and the search for meaning in later life. Ageing Society 1992; 12: 23-47.

10.

Coleman PG , Ivani-Chalian C. , Robinson M. Self-esteem and its sources: stability and change in later life. Ageing Society 1993; 13: 171-92.

11.

Davis A. , Davis S. , Moss N. et al. First steps towards an interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation . Clin Rehabil 1992; 6: 237-44.

12.

Law M. , Baptiste S. , Carswell-Opzoomer A. , McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Toronto: CAOT Publications ACE, 1991.

13.

Law M. , Polatajko H. , Pollock N. , McColl MA , Carswell A. , Baptiste S. Pilot testing of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: clinical and measure-measurement issues. Can J Occup Ther 1994; 61: 191-97.

14.

Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1985.

15.

Kivnick HQ Living with care, caring for life: the inventory of life strengths. Assessing psychosocial strengths in long-term care clients. Long-term Care Decisions Resource Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 1991 .

16.

Kivnick HQ Everyday mental health: a guide to assessing life strengths. Generations 1993; Winter/Spring: 13-20.

17.

Erikson EH , Erikson JM , Kivnick HQ Vital involvement in old age: the experience of old age in our time. New York: Norton, 1986.

18.

Yin RK Case study research, design and methods. California: Sage Publications, 1989: 89.

19.

Folstein MF , Folstein SE , McHugh PR 'Mini-Mental State'. A practical method for grading the cognitive skills of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-98.