Abstract
Objective
This systematic review aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of acute intermittent hypoxia to improve motor outcomes in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.
Data source
Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched.
Review methods
We only included randomized controlled trials (published up to September 2025) that met the following criteria: participants were adults with incomplete spinal cord injury; the intervention involved acute intermittent hypoxia with or without motor training; the control group received sham acute intermittent hypoxia with or without motor training; outcomes included motor functions. Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB2 tool. Risk and mean differences were computed, with a random-effects model.
Results
Nine randomized controlled trials (n = 114) were included. Overall risk of bias was with some concerns. The review indicates that acute intermittent hypoxia is safe and has good treatment adherence, with low drop-out rates for acute intermittent hypoxia alone (RD = 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.11–0.26; I2 = 0%; n = 66) or with gait training (RD = 0.04; 95% CI: −0.11–0.18; I2 = 0%; n = 57). Acute intermittent hypoxia was found to have beneficial effects on walking speed (MD = 5.97; 95% CI: 1.4–10.54; I2 = 0%; n = 53), endurance (MD = 39.39; 95% CI: 1.92–76.86; I2 = 50%; n = 54), muscle strength, and manual dexterity. However, no significant effects were observed on balance functions.
Conclusion
Acute intermittent hypoxia may be a promising adjunctive therapy to enhance motor function in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Further research with standardized protocols and larger sample sizes is needed to optimize its use in clinical practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
