A Comparison of a Driving Simulator and a Road Test in the Assessment of Driving Ability after a Stroke

Abstract

This study investigated the value of a driving simulator as an assessment procedure for stroke patients who wished to resume driving. Thirty-eight stroke patients who had been driving immediately prior to their stroke were assessed using a driving simulator. On the basis of this assessment, patients were graded into ‘pass’, ‘borderline’ or ‘fail' categories. Patients were then given a road test and were again graded into the same three groups by a driving instructor. Judgements of fitness to drive obtained using a simulator were compared with those of a road test using the Kappa coefficient to define levels of agreement. The simulator and road test gradings showed poor agreement (K=0.29). This indicates that a simulator should not be used as the sole indication of fitness to drive for stroke patients.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Espir

Godwin-Austen

. Disorders of the nervous system. In: Medical Aspects of Fitness to Drive, fourth edition, London: Medical Commission on Accident Prevention, 1985.

2. Nouri

. Driving after stroke: a survey (in preparation).

3. Nouri

Tinson

Lincoln

. The relationship between cognitive ability and driving after a stroke. Inter Disab Studies 1987; 9: 110–15.

4. Doron Precision Systems, Inc P.O. Box 400, Brighampton, New York 13902, USA.

5. Drosdol

Kading

Panik

. The Daimler-Benz driving simulator: new technologies demand new instruments. Proceedings 9th IAVSD Symposium, Linkoping, Sweden, 1985.

6. Irwin

Ranu

Bruley

Kerr

Hale

. Quantitative assessment of residual capabilities as a method of predicting disabled driver performance. Proceedings 2nd Inter Conference on Rehabil Engineering, Ottawa, Canada, 1984.

7. Chan

Hershler

Laszlo

Baxter

. The GF Strong computerized driver assessment module (CDAM). 12th C.M.B.E.C./1st Pan Pacific symposium, Vancouver, Canada, 1986.

8. Matsko

Boblitz

Glass

Rosenthal

. Driving skill prediction in communication impaired stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1975; 56: 552.

9. Jones

. A new rehabilitation technique. New Zealand Hospital 1977; 27: 27–28.

10.

10. Crancer

. Department of Motor Vehicles, Office of Research and Technology, Washington State, USA, 1971.

11.

11. Hakkinen

. Traffic accidents and driver characteristics. Institute of Technology, Scientific Researches No. 13, Helsinki, Finland, 1958.

12.

12. Goodenough

. A review of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in auto safety. Human Factors 1976; 18: 53–62.

13.

13. Jones

Giddens

Croft

. Assessment and training of brain damaged drivers. Amer Jou Occ Ther 1983; 37: 754–60.

14.

14. Quigley

De Lisa

. Assessing the driving potential of cerebral vascular accident patients. Amer Jou Occ Ther 1983; 37: 474–78.

15.

15. Miller

Goodson

. Motion sickness in a helicopter simulator. Aerospace Medicine 1960; 31: 204–21.

16.

16. Wilson

Smith

. Driving after stroke. Int Rehabil Med 1983; 5: 170–77.

17.

17. Cohen

. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20: 37–46.

18.

18. Fleiss

. The measurement of inter-rater agreement, in: Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981.