Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To translate the full version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale into Arabic, assess its reliability and validity, and evaluate the listening ability scores of Arabic-speaking individuals with hearing impairments.

Design

Cross-sectional study involving linguistic adaptation and psychometric evaluation of a self-reported hearing questionnaire.

Setting

Conducted in audiology clinics and university research facilities, where participants were assessed and followed-up under standardized testing conditions.

Participants

Two hundred twenty participants, including 110 with hearing loss and 110 age- and gender-matched individuals with normal hearing. All were native Arabic speakers.

Intervention

Participants underwent audiological assessments and completed the translated full version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale. A subset completed the questionnaire again after 3 months to assess test–retest reliability.

Main measures

Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, while test–retest reliability was assessed through the intraclass correlation coefficient comparing baseline and follow-up scores. Discriminant validity was established by comparing the scores of individuals with and without hearing loss, and the relationships between scale scores and the percentage of hearing loss were also examined.

Results

The Arabic version demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.974). Test–retest reliability was confirmed with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.958; p < 0.001). The scale distinguished between participants with hearing loss and those with normal hearing (p < 0.001). Total scores showed significant negative correlations with hearing loss (r = 0.609; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The Arabic full version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing auditory perception, spatial hearing, and communication challenges among Arabic-speaking individuals with hearing impairments.

Keywords

Hearing loss spatial qualities speech reliability validity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. World report on hearing. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.

Chisolm

Johnson

Danhauer

, et al. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 110–120.

Clark

. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA 1981; 23: 493–500.

Gatehouse

Noble

. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 85–99.

Kramer

Kapteyn

Festen

, et al. The relationships between self-reported hearing disability and measures of auditory disability. Int J Audiol 1995; 34: 311–320.

Hickson

Clutterbuck

Khan

. Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the international outcome inventory for hearing aids. Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 586–595.

Cox

. Assessment of subjective outcomes. In: Katz

(eds) Handbook of clinical audiology. 5th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003, pp.608–624.

Newman

Weinstein

Jacobson

, et al. The hearing handicap inventory for adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 430–433.

Cox

Alexander

. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176–186.

10.

Dillon

James

Ginis

. Client oriented scale of improvement and its relationship to other measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8: 27–43.

11.

Noble

Jensen

Naylor

, et al. A short form of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale suitable for clinical use: the SSQ12. Int J Audiol 2013; 52: 409–412.

12.

Kiessling

Pichora-Fuller

Gatehouse

, et al. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: S92–101.

13.

Moulin

Richard

Hagege

. Validation of the French version of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2019; 136: 373–377.

14.

Sánchez

Cañas

de Azevedo

, et al. Cultural adaptation of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale to Colombian Spanish. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 88: 4–8.

15.

Kiessling

Grugel

Meister

, et al. Übertragung der fragebögen SADL, ECHO und SSQ ins Deutsche und deren evaluation. Z Audiol 2011; 50: 6–16.

16.

Kutnohorska

Chernova

Gatehouse

. Russian Adaptation of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale. Vestn Otorinolaringol 2008; 5: 51–53.

17.

Kim

Hong

Lee

, et al. Korean adaptation of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale. Korean J Audiol 2011; 15: 49–53.

18.

Alkhodair

Shabbir

Zulfiqar

, et al. Translation and validation of the Arabic version of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale twelve-item version. J Otolaryngol ENT Res 2014; 1: 15–21.

19.

Beaton

Bombardier

Guillemin

, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186–3191.

20.

Wild

Grove

Martin

, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcome measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health 2005; 8: 94–104.

21.

Akeroyd

Guy

Harrison

, et al. Factor analysis of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale and comparison with the Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile. J Am Acad Audiol 2014; 25: 152–167.

22.

Galvin

Noble

. Adaptation of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale for use with children, parents and teachers. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 14: 135–141.

23.

Mokkink

Prinsen

Bouter

, et al. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther 2016; 20: 105–113.

24.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Definitions of communication disorders and variations. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1993.

25.

Streiner

. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess 2003; 80: 99–103.

26.

Tavakol

Dennick

. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011; 2: 53–55.

27.

DeVellis

. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2016.

28.

Field

. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th ed. London: Sage Publications, 2018.

29.

Quar

Ishak

Lani

. Adapting the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale into Malay: a preliminary study. Speech Lang Hear 2019; 22: 142–148.

30.

Lotfi

Nazeri

Asgari

, et al. Iranian version of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale: a psychometric study. Acta Med Iran 2016; 54: 756–764.

31.

Cañete

Marfull

Torrente

, et al. The Spanish 12-item version of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale: adaptation, reliability and discriminant validity for people with and without hearing loss. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 1419–1426.

32.

Aguiar

de Almeida

de Miranda-Gonsalez

. Test-retest reliability of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale in Brazilian Portuguese. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 23: e380–e383.

33.

Kılıç

Kamışlı

Gündüz

, et al. Turkish validity and reliability study of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 59: 172–178.

34.

Falzone

Guerzoni

Pizzol

, et al. Adaptation and validation study of the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale in Italian normal-hearing children. Audiol Res 2022; 12: 297–306.

35.

Singh

Pichora-Fuller

. Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale: test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods. Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 733–740.

36.

Banh

Singh

Pichora-Fuller

. Age affects responses on the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale by adults with minimal audiometric loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2012; 23: 81–91.

37.

Tyler

Perreau

. Validation of the spatial hearing questionnaire. Ear Hear 2009; 30: 466–475.

38.

Demeester

Topsakal

Hendrickx

, et al. Hearing disability measured by the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale in clinically normal-hearing and hearing-impaired middle-aged persons, and disability screening by means of a reduced SSQ (the SSQ5). Ear Hear 2012; 33: 615–616.

39.

Wyss

Mecklenburg

Graham

. Self-assessment of daily hearing function for implant recipients: a comparison of mean total scores for the speech spatial qualities of hearing scale (SSQ49) with the SSQ12. Cochlear Implants Int 2020; 21: 167–178.

40.

Streiner

Norman

. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Cross-cultural adaptation,reliability,and validity of the Arabic version of the Speech,Spatial,and Qualities of Hearing Scale

Abstract

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Intervention

Main measures

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References