To determine if the addition of cognitive retraining to rehabilitation following stroke results in better everyday living outcomes.
Data sources
Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, OT Seeker and Cochrane Library were searched until January 2025.
Review methods
Randomised controlled trials were included if they measured change in function and investigated a cognitive retraining intervention aimed at restoration of impaired cognition in one or more specific cognitive domains in the adult stroke population. Papers were excluded if they exclusively provided interventions that were not restorative, such as compensatory approaches or direct task retraining. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality.
Results
Twenty-one studies involving 1476 participants were included. There was very low-quality evidence that basic activity of daily living (ADL) was not improved by the addition of cognitive retraining (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.04 to 1.01). There was moderate quality evidence that cognitive retraining had no effect on Instrumental ADL (IADL) (SMD −0.19, 95% CI −0.65 to 0.27) or other measures of functional performance (SMD −0.03, 95% CI −0.31 to 0.24).
Conclusions
Cognitive retraining focusing on restoration of one or more cognitive domains after stroke did not show an impact in basic ADL performance, IADL performance, or other measures of functional performance. Results were complicated by low-quality evidence and methodological factors including variations in study populations, interventions provided and outcome measures. Further research that includes suitable measures of everyday living is needed to provide more robust evidence and guide clinical practice.
ElenduCAmaechiDCElenduTC, et al.Stroke and cognitive impairment: understanding the connection and managing symptoms. Ann Med Surg (Lond)2023; 85: 6057–6066.
2.
WagleJFarnerLFlekkøyK, et al.Early post-stroke cognition in stroke rehabilitation patients predicts functional outcome at 13 months. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord2011; 31: 379–387.
3.
OrosRIPopescuCAIovaCA, et al.The impact of cognitive impairment after stroke on activities of daily living. Hum Vet Med Int J Bioflux Soc2016; 8: 41–44.
4.
TatemichiTKDesmondDWSternY, et al.Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1994; 57: 202–207.
5.
NysGMSvan ZandvoortaMJEvan der WorpHB, et al.Early depressive symptoms after stroke: neuropsychological correlates and lesion characteristics. J Neurol Sci2005; 228: 27–33.
6.
MellonLBrewerLHallP, et al.Cognitive impairment six months after ischaemic stroke: a profile from the ASPIRE-S study. BMC Neurol2015; 15: 1–9.
7.
ParkJHKimBJBaeHJ, et al.Impact of post-stroke cognitive impairment with no dementia on health-related quality of life. J Stroke2013; 15: 49–56.
8.
SkidmoreERWhyteEMHolmMB, et al.Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation participation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab2010; 91: 203–207.
9.
NysGMSVan ZandvoortMJEDe KortPLM, et al.Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovasc Dis2007; 23: 408–416.
10.
ChungCSYPollockACampbellT, et al.Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in adults with stroke or other adult non-progressive acquired brain damage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 4: CD008391.
11.
Bahar-FuchsAClareL and BW. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 5: CD003260.
12.
CiceroneKDahlbergCMalecJ. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2005; 86: 1681–1692.
13.
GopiYWildingEMadanCR. Memory rehabilitation: restorative, specific knowledge acquisition, compensatory, and holistic approaches. Cogn Process2022; 23: 537–557.
14.
JakASeelyeAJurickS. Crosswords to computers: a critical review of popular approaches to cognitive enhancement. Neuropsychol Rev2013; 23: 13–26.
15.
VirkSWilliamsTBrunsdonR, et al.Cognitive remediation of attention deficits following acquired brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroRehabilitation2015; 36: 367–377.
16.
GillespieDCBowenAChungCS, et al.Rehabilitation for post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of recommendations arising from systematic reviews of current evidence. Clin Rehabil2015; 29: 120–128.
17.
RogersJMFoordRStolwykRJ, et al.General and domain-specific effectiveness of cognitive remediation after stroke: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rev2018; 28: 285–309.
18.
van de VenRMMurreJMJVeltmanDJ, et al.Computer-based cognitive training for executive functions after stroke: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci2016; 10: 150.
19.
SpreijLAVisser-MeilyJMAvan HeugtenCM, et al.Novel insights into the rehabilitation of memory post acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci2014; 8: 993.
20.
RohlingMLFaustMEBeverlyB, et al.Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.’s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews.Neuropsychology2009; 23: 20–39.
21.
SigmundsdottirLLongleyWATateRL. Computerised cognitive training in acquired brain injury: a systematic review of outcomes using the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). Neuropsychol Rehabil2016; 26: 673–741.
22.
LoetscherTPotterKJWongD, et al.Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2019; 11: CD002842.
23.
das NairRCoggerHWorthingtonE, et al.Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2016; 9: CD002293.
24.
WeickerJPlanckM. Can impaired working memory functioning be improved by training? A meta-analysis with a special focus on brain injured patients. Neuropsychology2016; 30: 190–212.
25.
PoulinVKorner-BitenskyNDawsonDR, et al.Efficacy of executive function interventions after stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil2012; 19: 158–171.
HoffmannTBennettSKohC-L, et al.A systematic review of cognitive interventions to improve functional ability in people who have cognitive impairment following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil2010; 17: 99–107.
29.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlafJ, et al.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med2009; 6: 1–28.
30.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlafJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med2009; 151: 263–269.
31.
YehTTChangKCWuCY. The active ingredient of cognitive restoration: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of sequential combination of aerobic exercise and computer-based cognitive training in stroke survivors with cognitive decline. Arch Phys Med Rehab2019; 100: 821–827.
32.
HebertDLindsayPMMcIntyreA, et al.Canadian Stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke2016; 11: 459–484.
33.
de MortanNA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiotherapy2009; 55: 129–133.
34.
MaherCGSherringtonCHerbertRD, et al.Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther2003; 88: 713–721.
35.
FoleyNCTeasellRBhogalSK, et al.Stroke rehabilitation evidence-based review: methodology. Top Stroke Rehabil2003; 10: 1–7.
36.
HoffmannTCGlasziouPPBoutronI, et al.Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Br Med J2014; 348: g1687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687
37.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
38.
HigginsJPAltmanDG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2008, pp.187–241.
39.
HigginsJPTThompson SimonGDeeks JonathanJ, et al.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J2003; 327: 557–560.
40.
GRADE working group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J2004; 328: 1490.
41.
HoHYChenMDTsaiCC, et al.Effects of computerized cognitive training on cognitive function, activity, and participation in individuals with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation2022; 51: 79–89.
42.
WentinkMMBergerMAde KloetAJ, et al.The effects of an 8-week computer-based brain training programme on cognitive functioning, QoL and self-efficacy after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil2016; 26: 847–865.
43.
WithielTDWongDPonsfordJL, et al.Comparing memory group training and computerized cognitive training for improving memory function following stroke: a phase II randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med2019; 51: 343–351.
44.
AkerlundEEsbjornssonESunnerhagenKS, et al.Can computerized working memory training improve impaired working memory, cognition and psychological health?Brain Inj2013; 27: 1649–1657.
45.
BjorkdahlAAkerlundESvenssonS, et al.A randomized study of computerized working memory training and effects on functioning in everyday life for patients with brain injury. Brain Inj2013; 27: 1658–1665.
46.
RichterKMMöddenCElingP, et al.Working memory training and semantic structuring improves remembering future events, not past events. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2015; 29: 33–40.
47.
WeickerJHudlNHildebrandtH, et al.The effect of high vs. low intensity neuropsychological treatment on working memory in patients with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj2020; 34: 1051–1060.
48.
ChoH-YKimK-TJungJ-H. Effects of neurofeedback and computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation on relative brain wave ratios and activities of daily living of stroke patients: a randomized control trial. J Phys Ther Sci2016; 28: 2154–2158.
49.
KimHSLimKBYooJ, et al.The efficacy of computerized cognitive rehabilitation in improving attention and executive functions in acquired brain injury patients, in acute and postacute phase. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2021; 57: 551–559.
50.
PoulinVKorner-BitenskyNBhererL, et al.Comparison of two cognitive interventions for adults experiencing executive dysfunction post-stroke: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil2017; 39: 1–13.
51.
van de VenRMMurreJMJBuitenwegJIV, et al.The influence of computer-based cognitive flexibility training on subjective cognitive wellbeing after stroke: a multi-center randomized controlled trial. PLoS One2017; 12: e0187582.
52.
ManDWSoongWYTamSF, et al.A randomized clinical trial study on the effectiveness of a tele-analogy-based problem-solving programme for people with acquired brain injury (ABI). Neurorehabilitation2006; 21: 205–217.
53.
SoderbackI. The effectiveness of training intellectual functions in adults with acquired brain damage. An evaluation of occupational therapy methods. Scand J Rehabil Med1988; 20: 47–56.
54.
CarterLTOliveiraDODuponteJ, et al.The relationship of cognitive skills performance to activities of daily living in stroke patients. Am J Occup Ther1988; 42: 449–455.
55.
De LucaRCalabroRSGervasiG, et al.Is computer-assisted training effective in improving rehabilitative outcomes after brain injury? A case–control hospital-based study. Disabil Health J2014; 7: 356–360.
56.
ZucchellaCCaponeACodellaV, et al.Assessing and restoring cognitive functions early after stroke. Funct Neurol2014; 29: 255–262.
57.
HanKLiuGLiuN, et al.Effects of mobile intelligent cognitive training for patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized controlled study. J Alzheimer's Dis2024; 100: 999–1015.
58.
ProkopenkoSVMozheykoEYPetrovaMM, et al.Correction of post-stroke cognitive impairments using computer programs. J Neurol Sci2013; 325: 148–153.
59.
WesterbergHJacobaeusHHirvikoskiT, et al.Computerized working memory training after stroke – a pilot study. Brain Inj2007; 21: 21–29.
60.
Barker-ColloSLFeiginVLLawesCMM, et al.Reducing attention deficits after stroke using attention process training. Stroke Res Treat2009; 40: 3293–3298.
61.
LundqvistAGrundstromKSamuelssonK, et al.Computerized training of working memory in a group of patients suffering from acquired brain injury. Brain Inj2010; 24: 1173–1183.
62.
HanKLiuGLiuN, et al.Effects of mobile intelligent cognitive training for patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized controlled study. J Alzheimer's Dis2024; 100: 999–1015.
63.
O'DonoghueMLeahySBolandP, et al.Rehabilitation of cognitive deficits poststroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke2022; 53: 1700–1710.
64.
DuffyLGajreeSLanghorneP, et al.Reliability (inter-rater agreement) of the Barthel index for assessment of stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke2013; 44: 462–468.
65.
van der PuttenJJMFHobartJCFreemanJA, et al.Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the functional independence measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1999; 66: 480–484.
66.
VanbellingenTOttigerBPflugshauptT, et al.The responsiveness of the Lucerne ICF-based multidisciplinary observation scale: a comparison with the functional independence measure and the Barthel index. Front Neurol2016; 7: 52.
67.
CiceroneKDGoldinYGanciK, et al.Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2019; 100: 1515–1533.
68.
YeoYXPestellCFBucksRS, et al.Metacognitive knowledge and functional outcomes in adults with acquired brain injury: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil2021; 31: 453–478.
69.
SwantonRGustafssonLFroudeE, et al.Cognitive strategy training for adults with neurological conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring effect on occupational performance. Brit J Occup Ther2020; 83: 723–740.
70.
BernhardtJCramerSC. Giant steps for the science of stroke rehabilitation. Int J Stroke2013; 8: 1–2.
71.
SaaJPTseTBaumCM, et al.Cognitive recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis and metaregression of intervention and cohort studies. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2021; 35: 585–600.
72.
NiePLiuFLinS, et al.The effects of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive impairment after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs2021; 31: 1136–1148.
73.
de HaanENysGVan ZandvoortM. Cognitive function following stroke and vascular cognitive impairment. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg2006; 19: 59–64.
74.
KrucoffMOMillerJOTSaxenaT, et al.Toward functional restoration of the central nervous system: a review of translational neuroscience principles. Neurosurgery2019; 84: 30–40.
75.
DouiriAGraceJSarkerS-J, et al.Patient-specific prediction of functional recovery after stroke. Int J Stroke2017; 12: 539–548.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
