To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation in poststroke patients with upper extremity motor dysfunction using a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data Sources
We searched the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed for randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of both active and sham stimulation up until January 27, 2024.
Review Methods
Efficacy, including the upper extremity Fugl–Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test, Barthel Index, and safety, were assessed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.4 software.
Results
Forty-four studies with 1555 participants were included. Transcranial direct current stimulation proved effective in improving upper extremity motor function (standardized mean difference = 0.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.12–0.32, P < 0.001) and Barthel Index (mean difference = 4.65, 95% confidence interval: 2.82–6.49, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed the highest transcranial direct current stimulation efficacy in patients with subacute stroke. Both anodal and cathodal stimulation were effective against upper extremity motor dysfunction. C3/C4 was the most effective stimulus target. Optimal stimulation parameters included stimulus current densities <0.057 mA/cm2 for 20–30 min and <30 sessions. Adverse effects and dropouts during follow-up showed that transcranial direct current stimulation is safe and feasible.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that both anodal and cathodal stimulation were significantly effective in subacute stroke patients, particularly when preceding other treatments and when C3/C4 is targeted.
FeiginVLNorrvingBMensahGA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res2017; 120: 439–448.
2.
KatanMLuftA. Global burden of stroke. Semin Neurol2018; 38: 208–211.
3.
WinsteinCJSteinJArenaR, et al.Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke2016; 47: e98–e169.
4.
TongYPendyJTJr.LiWA, et al.Motor imagery-based rehabilitation: potential neural correlates and clinical application for functional recovery of motor deficits after stroke. Aging Dis2017; 8: 364–371.
5.
TaketomiMShimizuYKadoneH, et al.Shoulder joint hybrid assistive limb treatment for chronic stroke patients with upper limb dysfunction. J Clin Med2023; 12: 1215. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031215
6.
LefaucheurJPAntalAAyacheSS, et al.Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol2017; 128: 56–92.
7.
SharmaNCohenLG. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Dev Psychobiol2012; 54: 254–262.
8.
Van HoornwederSVanderzandeLBloemersE, et al.The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper-limb function post-stroke: a meta-analysis of multiple-session studies. Clin Neurophysiol2021; 132: 1897–1918.
9.
BaiXGuoZHeL, et al.Different therapeutic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper and lower limb recovery of stroke patients with motor dysfunction: a meta-analysis. Neural Plast2019; 2019: 1372138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1372138
10.
ElsnerBKwakkelGKuglerJ,et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving capacity in activities and arm function after stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Neuroeng Rehabil2017; 14: 95.
11.
ChowAMDShinJWangH, et al.Influence of transcranial direct current stimulation dosage and associated therapy on motor recovery post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci2022: 14: 821915.
12.
Comino-SuárezNMorenoJCGómez-SorianoJ, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy for upper and lower limb function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. J Neuroeng Rehabil2021; 18: 148.
13.
LeeJ-HJeunY-JParkHY,et al.Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with rehabilitation on arm and hand function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare2021; 9: 1705. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121705
14.
MoseleyAMElkinsMRVan der WeesPJ,et al.Using research to guide practice: the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro). Braz J Phys Ther2020; 24: 384–391.
15.
PageSJFulkGDBoyneP. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther2012; 92: 791–798.
16.
Van der LeeJHDe GrootVBeckermanH, et al.The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 14–19.
17.
HsiehYWWangCHWuSC, et al.Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2007; 21: 233–238.
18.
AlisarDCOzenSSozayS. Effects of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity function in stroke patients: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2020; 29: 104454. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104454
19.
BologniniNRussoCCairnero SouzaMI, et al.Bi-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation for upper-limb hemiparesis in acute stroke: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Eur J Neurol2020; 27: 2473–2482.
20.
BologniniNVallarGCasatiC, et al.Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2011; 25: 819–829.
21.
BornheimSCroisierJ-LMaquetP,et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with physical-therapy in acute stroke patients - A randomized, triple blind, sham-controlled study. Brain Stimul2020; 13: 329–336.
22.
ChaHKJiSGKimMK,et al.Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of function in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci2014; 26: 363–365.
23.
ChewETeoWPTangN, et al.Using transcranial direct current stimulation to augment the effect of motor imagery-assisted brain-computer interface training in chronic stroke patients—cortical reorganization considerations. Front Neurol2020; 11: 948.
24.
CunninghamDAVarnerinNMachadoA, et al.Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: a proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms. Restor Neurol Neurosci2015; 33: 911–926.
25.
DongXLSunXSunWM, et al.A randomized controlled trial to explore the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation on patients with post-stroke fatigue. Medicine (Baltimore)2021; 100: e27504.
26.
EdwardsDJCortesMRykman-PeltzA, et al.Clinical improvement with intensive robot-assisted arm training in chronic stroke is unchanged by supplementary tDCS. Restor Neurol Neurosci2019; 37: 167–180.
27.
FuscoAAssenzaFIosaM, et al.The ineffective role of Cathodal tDCS in enhancing the functional motor outcomes in early phase of stroke rehabilitation: an experimental trial. BioMed Res Int2014; 2014: 547290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/547290
28.
GarridoMAlvarezEEAcevedoPF, et al.Early transcranial direct current stimulation with modified constraint-induced movement therapy for motor and functional upper limb recovery in hospitalized patients with stroke: a randomized, multicentre, double-blind, clinical trial. Brain Stimul2023; 16: 40–47.
29.
GongQYanRChenH, et al.Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on rehabilitation of upper limb motor function after stroke. Front Neurol2023; 14: 1044333.
30.
HesseSWaldnerAMehrholzJ, et al.Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2011; 25: 838–846.
31.
HsuS-PLuC-FLinB-F, et al.Effects of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: a double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil2023; 20: 27.
32.
KashooFZAl-BaradieRSAlzahraniM, et al.Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation augmented with motor imagery and upper-limb functional training for upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 15199. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215199
33.
KimD-YLimJ-YKangEK, et al.Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2010; 89: 879–886.
34.
KohC-LLinJ-HJengJ-S, et al.Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with sensory modulation on stroke motor rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2017; 98: 2477–2484.
35.
LindenbergRRengaVZhuLL, et al.Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology2010; 75: 2176–2184.
36.
ManeRChewEPhuaKS, et al.Prognostic and monitory EEG-biomarkers for BCI upper-limb stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2019; 27: 1654–1664.
37.
MazzoleniSTranVDIardellaL, et al.Randomized, sham-controlled trial based on transcranial direct current stimulation and wrist robot-assisted integrated treatment on subacute stroke patients: intermediate results. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Rob2017; 2017: 555–560.
38.
MazzoleniSVi-DoTDarioP,et al.Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with wrist robot-assisted rehabilitation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2019; 27: 1458–1466.
39.
MoroneGCaponeFIosaM, et al.May dual transcranial direct current stimulation enhance the efficacy of robot-assisted therapy for promoting upper limb recovery in chronic stroke?Neurorehabil Neural Repair2022; 36: 800–809.
40.
NicoloPMagninCPedrazziniE, et al.Comparison of neuroplastic responses to cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation in subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2018; 99: 862–872.
41.
OveisgharanSOrganjiHGhorbaniA. Enhancement of motor recovery through left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2018; 27: 185–191.
42.
PavlovaELLindbergPKhanA, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with visuo-motor training as treatment for chronic stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci2017; 35: 307–317.
43.
PintoEFGuptaAKulkarniGB,et al.A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of transcranial direct current stimulation as an augmentation intervention for the attenuation of motor deficits in patients with stroke. J ECT2021; 37: 281–290.
44.
PiresRBaltarASanchezMP, et al.Do higher transcranial direct current stimulation doses lead to greater gains in upper limb motor function in post-stroke patients?Int J Environ Res Public Health2023; 20: 1279. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021279
45.
PrathumTPiriyaprasarthPAneksanB, et al.Effects of home-based dual-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise on upper and lower limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil2021; 28: 1–12.
46.
QuSSongW. Effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis2017; 14: 622–627.
47.
QuSZhuLSongW. Improving effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with motor relearning program for the upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis2017; 14: 20–24.
48.
RabadiMHAstonCE. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on severely affected arm-hand motor function in patients after an acute ischemic stroke A pilot randomized control trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2017; 96: S178–S184.
49.
RochaSSilvaEFoersterA, et al.The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil2016; 38: 653–660.
50.
RossiCSallustioFDi LeggeS, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients. Eur J Neurol2013; 20: 202–204.
51.
SalazarAPCimolinVSchifinoGP, et al.Bi-cephalic transcranial direct current stimulation combined with functional electrical stimulation for upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2020; 63: 4–11.
52.
StraudiSFregniFMartinuzziC, et al.tDCS and robotics on upper limb stroke rehabilitation: effect modification by stroke duration and type of stroke. Biomed Res Int2016; 2016: 5068127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5068127
53.
TaudBLindenbergRDarkowR, et al.Limited add-on effects of unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation on visuo-motor grip force tracking task training outcome in chronic stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol2021; 12: 736075.
54.
TedlaJSRodriguesEFerreiraAS, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with trunk-targeted, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. PeerJ2022; 10: e13329. doi:https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13329
55.
TriccasLTBurridgeJHHughesA, et al.A double-blinded randomised controlled trial exploring the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and uni-lateral robot therapy for the impaired upper limb in sub-acute and chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation2015; 37: 181–191.
56.
UngerRHLoweMJBeallE, et al.Stimulation of the premotor cortex enhances inter-hemispheric functional connectivity in association with upper limb motor recovery in moderate-to-severe chronic stroke. Brain Connect2023; 13: 453–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2022.0064
57.
WeiY-YKohC-LHsuM-J, et al.Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with stroke. JCO Oncol Pract2022; 18: 145–151.
58.
YagueSVecianaMMartinez-YelamosA, et al.Effects of bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation combined with repetitive peripheral nerve stimulation in acute stroke patients. J Clin Neurophysiol2023; 40: 63–70.
59.
YaoXCuiLWangJ, et al.Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with virtual reality on upper limb function in patients with ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil2020; 17: 73.
60.
LiHZhaoLYuanX, et al.Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with respiratory training on dysphagia in post-stroke patients. Technol Health Care2023; 31: 11–19.
61.
VimolratanaOAneksanBSiripornpanichV, et al.Effects of anodal tDCS on resting state EEG power and motor function in acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil2024; 21: 6.
62.
LiCChenYTuS, et al.Dual-tDCS combined with sensorimotor training promotes upper limb function in subacute stroke patients: a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled study. CNS Neurosci Ther2023; 00: 1–13.
63.
PandianSAryaKN. Stroke-related motor outcome measures: do they quantify the neurophysiological aspects of upper extremity recovery?J Bodyw Mov Ther2014; 18: 412–423.
64.
LundquistCBMariboT. The Fugl–Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version. Disabil Rehabil2016; 39: 934–939.
65.
AmanoSUmejiATakahashiK, et al.Psychometric properties of the action research arm test using decision rules for skipping items in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a retrospective study. Disabil Rehabil2023; 45: 4471–4477.
66.
BushnellCBettgerJPCockroftKM, et al.Chronic stroke outcome measures for motor function intervention trials: expert panel recommendations. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2015; 8: S163–S169.
67.
ChaseHWBoudewynMACarterCS,et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation: a roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation. Mol Psychiatry2020; 25: 397–407.
68.
Santos FerreiraITeixeira CostaBLima RamosC, et al.Searching for the optimal tDCS target for motor rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil2019; 16: 90.
69.
BarbatiSAPoddaMVGrassiC. Tuning brain networks: the emerging role of transcranial direct current stimulation on structural plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci2022; 16: 945777.
70.
GellnerAKReisJHoltickC, et al.Direct current stimulation-induced synaptic plasticity in the sensorimotor cortex: structure follows function. Brain Stimul2020; 13: 80–88.
71.
DavalosDGrutzendlerJYangG, et al.ATP Mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat Neurosci2005; 8: 752–758.
72.
GellnerAKReisJFritschB. Glia: a neglected player in non-invasive direct current brain stimulation. Front Cell Neurosci2016; 10: 88.
73.
TavakoliRSadjediHPourmir FiroozabadiSM. An application of simulated annealing to optimal transcranial direct current stimulation of the human brain. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci2016; 24: 1135–1149.
74.
ChhatbarPYRamakrishnanVKautzS, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation post-stroke upper extremity motor recovery studies exhibit a dose-response relationship. Brain Stimul2016; 9: 16–26.
75.
PillenSKnodelNHermleD, et al.No robust online effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability. Brain Stimul2022; 15: 1254–1268.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
