To explore how personal characteristics and social engagement impact the physical activity levels of chronic stroke survivors.
Design
A mixed-methods study comprising in-depth semi-structured interviews and objective 24-h physical activity monitoring. Interviews were thematically analysed, and activity diaries were compared to activity monitor data to attain a complete picture of physical activity. Triangulation explored the relationship between perceptions, beliefs, activity levels and social engagement.
Setting
Community.
Participants
Community-dwelling, independently mobile, adult stroke survivors (n = 19). The mean age was 74 (11 SD) years, 52% female, mean time post-stroke 41 (SD 61) months.
Main measures
Qualitative and quantitative measures including individual semi-structured interviews, accelerometry, activity diaries, self-efficacy, Frenchay Activities Index and Barthel Index.
Results
Individual identity had the greatest perceived influence on post-stroke physical activity. Pre-stroke identity, meaningful activities and family culture contributed to identity; while social and community activities, self-efficacy, co-morbidities, stroke symptoms and exercise, also impacted physical activity. Participants averaged 5365 (IQR 3378–7854) steps per day and reported a mean self-efficacy for exercise score of 51 (SD 20). Triangulation showed convergent relationships between post-stroke physical activity levels and participant motivation, comorbidities, level of social and community participation, self-efficacy and pre-stroke activity levels.
Conclusion
Personal identity, social engagement and community participation are important factors to consider when implementing a person-centred approach to increasing physical activity participation post-stroke.
FeiginVLRothGANaghaviM, et al.Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Neurol2016; 15: 913–924.
2.
FiniNAHollandAEKeatingJ, et al.How physically active are people following stroke? Systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Phys Ther2017; 97: 10.
3.
TuranTNNizamALynnMJ, et al.Relationship between risk factor control and vascular events in the SAMMPRIS trial. Neurology2017; 88: 6.
4.
BillingerSAArenaRBernhardtJ, et al.Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke2014; 45: 53.
5.
SimpsonLAEngJJTawashyAE. Exercise perceptions among people with stroke – barriers and facilitators to participation. Int J Ther Rehabil2011; 18: 10.
6.
SimpsonDCallisayaMLEnglishC, et al.Self-reported exercise prevalence and determinants in the long term after stroke: the north east Melbourne stroke incidence study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2017; 26: 2855–2863.
7.
EnglishCJanssenHCrowfootG, et al. Frequent, short bouts of light-intensity exercises while standing decreases systolic blood pressure: breaking up sitting time after stroke (BUST-stroke) trial. Int J Stroke2018; 13: 932–940.
8.
LordSEMcPhersonKMcNaughtonHK, et al.Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive?Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 234–239.
9.
FiniNABernhardtJChurilovL, et al. Adherence to physical activity and cardiovascular recommendations over the two years following stroke rehabilitation discharge. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.018.
10.
EspernbergerKFiniNAPeirisCL. Personal and social factors that influence physical activity levels in community-dwelling stroke survivors: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Clin Rehabil2021. DOI: d0o.i1.o1r7g/71/00.12167972/012565921595923169930.
11.
ThilarajahSMentiplayBFBowerKJ, et al.Factors associated with post-stroke physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2018; 99: 1876–1889.
12.
JacksonSMercerCSingerBJ. An exploration of factors influencing physical activity levels amongst a cohort of people living in the community after stroke in the south of England. Disabil Rehabil2018; 40: 414–424.
13.
ChangEChoiSKwonI, et al. Characterizing beliefs about stroke and walking for exercise among seniors from four racial/ethnic minority communities. J Cross Cult Gerontol2018; 33: 387–410.
14.
FingermanKLHuoMCharlesST, et al. Variety is the spice of late life: social integration and daily activity. J Gerontol2019; 29. 2019/02/21. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbz007.
15.
NicholsonSSniehottaFFvan WijckF, et al.A systematic review of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity after stroke. Int J Stroke2012; 8: 357–364.
16.
OutermansJPoolJvan de PortI, et al.What’s keeping people after stroke from walking outdoors to become physically active? A qualitative study, using an integrated biomedical and behavioral theory of functioning and disability. BMC Neurol2016; 16: 137.
17.
ProutECMansfieldAMcIlroyWE, et al.Patients’ perspectives on aerobic exercise early after stroke. Disabil Rehabil2017; 39: 684–690.
18.
PfeifferE. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc1975; 23: 8.
19.
SaundersBSimJKingstoneT, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant2018; 52: 1893–1907.
20.
GrantBMGiddingsLS. Making sense of methodologies: a paradigm framework for the novice researcher. Contemp Nurse2002; 13: 10–28.
21.
LiamputtongP. Qualitative research methods. Melbourne: Oxford University Press Australia and New Zealand, 2012.
22.
TaraldsenKAskimTSletvoldO, et al.Evaluation of a body-worn sensor system to measure physical activity in older people with impaired function. Phys Ther2011; 91: 9.
23.
DuffyLGajreeSLanghorneP, et al. Reliability (inter-rater agreement) of the Barthel Index for assessment of stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke2013; 44: 462–468.
24.
MartinsJCAguiarLTNadeauS, et al. Measurement properties of self-report physical activity assessment tools for patients with stroke: a systematic review. Braz J Phys Ther2019. 2019/03/16. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.004.
25.
DecourcelleAMoulinSSibonI, et al.Influence of previous physical activity on the outcome of patients treated by thrombolytic therapy for stroke. J Neurol2015; 262: 2513–2519.
26.
DeplanqueDMasseILibersaC, et al. Previous leisure-time physical activity dose dependently decreases ischemic stroke severity. Stroke Res Treat2012; 2012: 614925.
27.
DeplanqueDMasseILefebvreC, et al.Prior TIA, lipid-lowering drug use, and physical activity decrease ischemic stroke severity. Neurology2006; 8: 7.
28.
CharlsonMEPompeiPAlesKL, et al.A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis1987; 40: 373–383.
29.
CooperHCamicPMLongDL, et al.APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2012.
30.
ResnickBJenkinsLS. Testing the reliability and validity of the self-efficacy for exercise scale. Nurs Res2000; 49: 5.
31.
MunroBH. Correlations. In: Munro BH and Page EB (eds)Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co, 1993, pp. 181–182.
32.
ShahSVanclayFCooperB. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol1989; 42: 6.
33.
HolbrookMSkilbeckCE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing1983; 12: 4.
34.
MonteiroMMasoISasakiAC, et al. Validation of the Frenchay activity index on stroke victims. Arq Neuropsiquiatr2017; 75: 167–171.
35.
YoungK. Me and my identity. In: Young K (ed)The domains of identity: a framework for understanding identity systems in contemporary society. London: Anthem Press, 2020, pp. 9–16.
36.
FiniNBernhardtJHollandAE. Types of physical activity performed pre and post stroke. Braz J Phys Ther2022; 26. DOI: 10.101016/j.bjpt.2022.100412.
37.
KramerSJohnsonLBernhardtJ, et al. Energy expenditure and cost during walking after stroke: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2016; 97: 619–632.e611.
38.
GlassTADe LeonCFBassukSS, et al. Social engagement and depressive symptoms in late life: longitudinal findings. J Aging Health2006; 18: 604–628.
39.
CacioppoJTHawkleyLCThistedRA. Perceived social isolation makes me sad: 5-year cross-lagged analyses of loneliness and depressive symptomatology in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. Psychol Aging2010; 25: 453–463.
40.
TseTBinte YusoffSZChurilovL, et al. Increased work and social engagement is associated with increased stroke specific quality of life in stroke survivors at 3 months and 12 months post-stroke: a longitudinal study of an Australian stroke cohort. Top Stroke Rehabil2017; 24: 405–414.
41.
UstunTBChatterjiSBickenbachJ, et al. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil2003; 25: 565–571.
42.
FiniNABernhardtJSaidCM, et al. How to address physical activity participation after stroke in research and clinical practice. Stroke2021; 52: e274–e277.
43.
MichieSvan StralenMMWestR. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci2011; 6. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
