Personal and social factors that influence physical activity levels in community-dwelling stroke survivors: A systematic review of qualitative literature
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2021
Personal and social factors that influence physical activity levels in community-dwelling stroke survivors: A systematic review of qualitative literature
To determine the personal and social factors perceived to influence physical activity levels in stroke survivors.
Data sources:
Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed and Embase) were searched from inception to November 2020, including reference and citation list searches.
Study selection:
The initial search yielded 1499 papers, with 14 included in the review. Included articles were peer-reviewed, qualitative studies, reporting on the perceived factors influencing physical activity levels of independently mobile community-dwelling adults, greater than 3 months post stroke.
Data extraction:
Data extracted included location, study aim, design, participant and recruitment information and how data were collected and analysed.
Data synthesis:
Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify meanings and patterns, generate codes and develop themes. Five main themes were identified: (i) Social networks are important influencers of physical activity; (ii) Participation in meaningful activities rather than ‘exercise’ is important; (iii) Self-efficacy promotes physical activity and physical activity enhances self-efficacy; (iv) Pre-stroke identity related to physical activity influences post-stroke physical activity; and (v) Formal programmes are important for those with low self-efficacy or a sedentary pre-stroke identity.
Conclusions:
Physical activity levels in stroke survivors are influenced by social activities and support, pre-stroke identity, self-efficacy levels and completion of activities that are meaningful to stroke survivors.
BrauerSGKuysSSParatzJD, et al. Improving physical activity after stroke via treadmill training and self management (IMPACT): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurol2018; 18(1): 13.
2.
FiniNAHollandAEKeatingJ, et al. How physically active are people following stroke? Systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Phys Ther2017; 97(7): 10.
3.
KongsawasdiSKlaphajoneJWivatvongvanaP, et al. Prognostic factors of functional outcome assessed by using the modified rankin scale in subacute ischemic stroke. J Clin Med Res2019; 11(5): 375–382.
4.
LordSEMcPhersonKMcNaughtonHK, et al. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive?Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85(2): 234–239.
5.
FiniNABernhardtJChurilovL, et al. Adherence to physical activity and cardiovascular recommendations over the two years following stroke rehabilitation discharge. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.018.
MorrisJOliverTKrollT, et al. The importance of psychological and social factors in influencing the uptake and maintenance of physical activity after stroke: a structured review of the empirical literature. Stroke Res Treat2012; 2012: 195249.
8.
WoodJConnellyDMalyM.Getting back to real living - a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke. Clin Rehabil2010; 24(11): 11.
9.
FingermanKLHuoMCharlesST, et al. Variety is the spice of late life: social integration and daily activity. J Gerontol2019; 29(2): 377–388.
10.
NicholsonSSniehottaFFvan WijckF, et al. A systematic review of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity after stroke. Int J Stroke2012; 8(5): 357–364.
11.
TongAFlemmingKMcInnesE, et al. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol2012; 12: 1–8.
12.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009; 6(7): e1000097.
13.
GrantBMGiddingsLS.Making sense of methodologies: a paradigm framework for the novice researcher. Contemp Nurse2002; 13(1): 10–28.
14.
SchneiderZWhiteheadDLoBiondo-WoodG, et al. Mixed-methods research. Nursing & midwifery research: methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice. 4th ed.Sydney: Elsevier, 2013, pp. 263–284.
15.
PonterottoJ.Qualitative research in counseling psychology: a primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. J Couns Psychol2005; 52(2): 126–136.
16.
LandisJRKochGG.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics1977; 33(1): 74.
MajidUVanstoneM.Appraising qualitative research for evidence synthesis: a copendium of quality appraisal tools. Qual Health Res2018; 28(13): 16.
19.
KokoreliasKMLuFKTSantosJR, et al. “Caregiving is a full-time job” impacting stroke caregivers’ health and well-being: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Health Soc Care Community2020; 28(2): 325–340.
20.
SatinkTCupEHIlottI, et al. Patients’ views on the impact of stroke on their roles and self: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2013; 94(6): 1171–1183.
BraunVClarkeV.Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3(2): 77–101.
23.
DamushTMPlueLBakasT, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exercise among stroke survivors. Rehabil Nurs2007; 32(6): 253–262.
24.
O’SullivanCChardG.An exploration of participation in leisure activities post-stroke. Aust Occup Ther J2010; 57(3): 159–166.
25.
PoltawskiLBoddyKForsterA, et al. Motivators for uptake and maintenance of exercise: perceptions of long-term stroke survivors and implications for design of exercise programmes. Disabil Rehabil2015; 37(9): 795–801.
26.
NicholsonSLDonaghyMJohnstonM, et al. A qualitative theory guided analysis of stroke survivors’ perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity. Disabil Rehabil2014; 36(22): 1857–1868.
27.
LawrenceMKerrSWatsonH, et al. An exploration of lifestyle beliefs and lifestyle behaviour following stroke - findings from a focus group study of patients and family members. BMC Fam Pract2010; 11(1): 1–1.
28.
RobisonJWilesREllis-HillC, et al. Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps?Disabil Rehabil2009; 31(19): 1555–1566.
29.
HammelJJonesRGossettA, et al. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil2006; 13(3): 43–58.
30.
HarrisAAustinMBlakeTM, et al. Perceived benefits and barriers to yoga participation after stroke: a focus group approach. Complement Ther Clin Pract2019; 34: 153–156.
31.
KubinaLADuboulozCJDavisCG, et al. The process of re-engagement in personally valued activities during the two years following stroke. Disabil Rehabil2013; 35(3): 236–243.
32.
MorrisJHOliverTKrollT, et al. From physical and functional to continuity with pre-stroke self and participation in valued activities: a qualitative exploration of stroke survivors’, carers’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions of physical activity after stroke. Disabil Rehabil2015; 37(1): 64–77.
33.
MorrisJHOliverTKrollT, et al. Physical activity participation in community dwelling stroke survivors: synergy and dissonance between motivation and capability. A qualitative study. Physiotherapy2017; 103(3): 311–321.
34.
SimpsonLAEngJJTawashyAE.Exercise perceptions among people with stroke - Barriers and facilitators to participation. Int J Ther Rehabil2011; 18(9): 10.
35.
BaileyR.Examining daily physical activity in community-dwelling adults with stroke using social cognitive theory: an exploratory, qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil2019; 42(18): 1–9.
36.
SharmaHBulleyCvan WijckFM.Experiences of an exercise referral scheme from the perspective of people with chronic stroke: a qualitative study. Physiotherapy2012; 98(4): 336–343.
37.
MorrisJHMacgillivraySMcFarlaneS.Interventions to promote long-term participation in physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2014; 95(5): 956–967.
38.
BerndS.Identity in modern society: a social psychological perspective. Oxford: Backwell Publishing, 2004.
39.
Martin-SaezMMJamesN.The experience of occupational identity disruption post stroke: a systematic review and meta-ethnography. Disabil Rehabil. Epub ahead of print August 2019. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1645889.
40.
LapadatuIMorrisR.The relationship between stroke survivors’ perceived identity and mood, self-esteem and quality of life. Neuropsychol Rehabil2019; 29(2): 199–213.
41.
GuicciardiMCartaMPauM, et al. The relationships between physical activity, self-efficacy, and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. Behav Sci (Basel)2019; 9(12): 121.
42.
KlompstraLJaarsmaTStrombergA.Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between motivation and physical activity in patients with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs2018; 33(3): 211–216.
43.
HosseingholizadehNSadeghiRArdebiliHE, et al. The correlation of self-efficacy and social support with social participation: a cross sectional study among the elderly. J Med Life2019; 12(3): 239–246.
44.
MeyerCDenisCMBerquinAD.Secondary prevention of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of clinical trials. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2018; 61(5): 323–338.
45.
Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute. National evidence-based guideline on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Melbourne, Australia: Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, 2015.
46.
ChangEChoiSKwonI, et al. Characterizing beliefs about stroke and walking for exercise among seniors from four racial/ethnic minority communities. J Cross-Cult Gerontol2018; 33(4): 387–410.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
