To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with disorders of consciousness.
Design and Setting
We performed a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial.
Participants
Patients (N = 40) with disorders of consciousness.
Interventions
Forty patients with disorders of consciousness (time since onset of the disorder 49.0 ± 24.6 days) were enrolled and randomized to groups receiving either active-rTMS or sham-rTMS. The active-TMS protocol had a frequency of 20 Hz, was delivered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and had a 100% rest motor threshold. The sham-rTMS protocol was the same as the active protocol without magnetic stimulation over the cortex.
Main Outcome Measures
Consciousness was evaluated by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) before and after the four-week intervention. The ratio of patients that awakened from disorders of consciousness was followed up at discharge.
Results
Before rTMS sessions, there were no significant differences in consciousness scores between groups. Compared to sham-rTMS (6.25 ± 1.29), patients with disorders of consciousness treated by active rTMS showed strikingly improved consciousness (8.45 ± 3.55). In-depth analysis revealed that only some patients showed obvious increases in consciousness scores induced by active rTMS. Furthermore, rTMS did not significantly enhance the awakening ratio.
Conclusions
rTMS showed therapeutic efficacy for improving consciousness in some, but not all, patients with disorders of consciousness. It is essential to discern the potential patients whose consciousness can be improved by rTMS.
CalabròRSCacciolaABramantiP,et al.Neural correlates of consciousness: what we know and what we have to learn!. Neurol Sci2015; 36: 505–513.
2.
QinPWuXHuangZ, et al.How are different neural networks related to consciousness?Ann Neurol2015; 78: 594–605.
3.
ClaussRP. Neurotransmitters in disorders of consciousness and brain damage. Med Hypotheses2011; 77: 209–213.
4.
LinYWenL. Inflammatory response following diffuse axonal injury. Int J Med Sci2013; 10: 515–521.
5.
SchnakersCMontiMM. Disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: therapeutic options. Curr Opin Neurol2017; 30: 573–579.
6.
SiebnerHRothwellJ. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res2003; 148: 1–16.
7.
ReidV. Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am2003; 14: 307–325.
8.
LefaucheurJPAlemanABaekenC, et al.Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol2020; 131: 474–528.
9.
Chervyakov AVChernyavskyAYSinitsynDO,et al.Possible mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci2015; 9: 1–14.
10.
HeFWuMMengF, et al.Effects of 20Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on disorders of consciousness: a resting-state electroencephalography study. Neural Plast2018; 2018: –8.
11.
CincottaMGiovannelliFChiaramontiR, et al.No effects of 20 Hz-rTMS of the primary motor cortex in vegetative state: a randomised, sham-controlled study. Cortex2015; 71: 368–376.
12.
BiggsATDainerHMLittlejohnLF. Effect sizes for symptomatic and cognitive improvements in traumatic brain injury following hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Appl Physiol2021; 130: 1594–1603.
13.
LiXLinYLCunninghamDA, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional dorsal premotor Cortex for upper extremity motor improvement in severe stroke: study protocol for a pilot randomized clinical trial. Cerebrovasc Dis 2022; 20: 1–8.
14.
GiacinoJTKalmarKWhyteJ. The JFK coma recovery scale-revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 2020–2029.
15.
FeldmanMCryerB. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. N Engl J Med1994; 330: 1499–1508.
16.
XiaXBaiYZhouY, et al.Effects of 10Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in disorders of consciousness. Front Neurol2017; 8: 1–8.
17.
XiaXLiuYBaiY, et al.Long-lasting repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates electroencephalography oscillation in patients with disorders of consciousness. Neuroreport2017; 28: 1022–1029.
18.
LiuXMengFGaoJ, et al.Behavioral and resting state functional connectivity effects of high frequency rtms on disorders of consciousness: a sham-controlled study. Front Neurol2018; 9: 1–8.
19.
TimofeevI. Origin of slow cortical oscillations in deafferented cortical slabs. Cereb Cortex2000; 10: 1185–1199.
20.
GiacinoJTFinsJJLaureysS,et al.Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol2014; 10: 99–114.
21.
BaekAParkEJKimSY, et al.High-frequency repetitive magnetic stimulation enhances the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor through activation of Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-cAMP-response element-binding protein pathway. Front Neurol2018; 9: 1–10.
22.
UeyamaEUkaiSOgawaA, et al.Chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci2011; 65: 77–81.
23.
MengDXuTGuoF,et al.The effects of high-intensity pulsed electromagnetic field on proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells of neonatal rats in vitro. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol [Medical Sci]2009; 29: 732–736.
24.
CuiMGeHZhaoH,et al.Electromagnetic fields for the regulation of neural stem cells. Stem Cells Int2017; 2017: 1–16.
25.
ParthoensJVerhaegheJWyckhuysT,et al.Small-animal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with [18F]-FDG microPET to quantify the neuromodulation effect in the rat brain. Neuroscience2014; 275: 436–443.
26.
ChoSSStrafellaAP. rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal Cortex modulates dopamine release in the ipsilateral anterior cingulate Cortex and orbitofrontal Cortex. Gribble PL, ed. PLoS One2009; 4: e6725.
27.
YueLXiao-linHTaoS. The effects of chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid in rat brain. Brain Res2009; 1260: 94–99.
28.
PetzinkaVNEndischCStreitbergerKJ, et al.Unresponsive wakefulness or coma after cardiac arrest—A long-term follow-up study. Resuscitation2018; 131: 121–127.
29.
AdmiraalMMvan RootselaarAFHofmeijerJ, et al.Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Ann Neurol2019; 86: 17–27.
30.
SongMYangYYangZ, et al.Prognostic models for prolonged disorders of consciousness: an integrative review. Cell Mol Life Sci2020; 77: 3945–3961.
31.
NoormandiAShahrokhiMKhaliliH. Potential benefits of zolpidem in disorders of consciousness. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol2017; 10: 983–992.
32.
MagrassiLMaggioniGPistariniC, et al.Results of a prospective study (CATS) on the effects of thalamic stimulation in minimally conscious and vegetative state patients. J Neurosurg2016; 125: 972–981.
33.
ThibautABrunoMALedouxD,et al.tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology2014; 82: 1112–1118.
34.
ThibautAWannezSDonneauAF, et al.Controlled clinical trial of repeated prefrontal tDCS in patients with chronic minimally conscious state. Brain Inj2017; 31: 466–474.
35.
Hernandez-PavonJCHarveyRL. Noninvasive transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am2019; 30: 319–335.
36.
ManganottiPFormaggioEStortiSF, et al.Effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on brain excitability in severely brain-injured patients in minimally conscious or vegetative state. Brain Stimul2013; 6: 913–921.
37.
NaroARussoMLeoA,et al.A single session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: preliminary results. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2015; 29: 603–613.
