Abstract
Objective:
This study examined the construct validity of the Enfranchisement scale of the Community Participation Indicators.
Design:
We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected in a cross-sectional study of rehabilitation outcomes.
Subjects:
The parent study included 604 community-dwelling adults with chronic traumatic brain injury, stroke, or spinal cord injury. The sample had a mean age of 64.1 years, was two-thirds male, and included a high proportion of racial minorities (
Main measures:
The Enfranchisement scale contains two subscales: the Control subscale and the Importance subscale. We examined correlations between each Enfranchisement subscale and measures of participation, environment, and impairments. The current analyses included cases with at least 80% of items completed on each subscale (Control subscale:
Results:
The sample demonstrated high scores, indicating poor enfranchisement (Control subscale:
Conclusions:
We found evidence of convergent validity between the Enfranchisement scale and measures of participation, and discriminant validity between the Enfranchisement scale and measures of disability-related impairments. The analyses also revealed the importance of the environment to enfranchisement outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
