To investigate whether Kinesio taping technique, applied to ankles of healthy people as a preventive intervention and people with ankle injuries, is superior to sham or alternative interventions on ankle function.
Data Sources:
Medline, Embase, Amed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, from inception to August 2020.
Review methods:
The terms “ankle” and “kinesio taping” were used in the search strategy. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (including crossover design) investigating Kinesio taping effects on ankle functional performance compared to any alternative or control/sham technique.
Results:
From 5,572 studies, 84 met the eligibility criteria which evaluated 2,684 people. Fifty-eight meta-analyses from 44 studies were performed (participants in meta-analyses ranging from 27 to 179). Fifty-one meta-analyses reported ineffectiveness of Kinesio taping: moderate evidence for star excursion balance test (anterior direction), jump distance, dorsiflexion range of motion, and plantar flexion torque for healthy people (effect size = 0.08–0.13); low to very-low evidence for balance, jump performance, range of motion, proprioception, muscle capacity and EMG for healthy people; balance for older people; and balance and jump performance for people with chronic instability. Seven meta-analyses reported results favoring Kinesio taping (effect size[95% CI]): low to very-low evidence for balance (stabilometry, ranging from 0.42[0.07–0.77] to 0.65[0.29–1.02]) and ankle inversion (0.84[0.28–1.40]) for healthy people; balance for older people (COP velocity, 0.90[0.01–1.78]); and balance for people with chronic instability (errors, 0.55[0.06–1.04]).
Conclusions:
Current evidence does not support or encourage the use of Kinesio taping applied to the ankle for improvements in functional performance, regardless the population.
DohertyCDelahuntECaulfieldB, et al. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med2014; 44: 123–140.
2.
FongDT-PHongYChanL-K, et al. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med2007; 37: 73–94.
3.
PasanenKEkolaTVasankariT, et al. High ankle injury rate in adolescent basketball: a 3-year prospective follow-up study. Scand J Med Sci Sports2017; 27: 643–649.
4.
WoodsCHawkinsRHulseM, et al. The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football: an analysis of ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med2003; 37: 233–238.
5.
AndrewNWolfeRCameronP, et al. The impact of sport and active recreation injuries on physical activity levels at 12 months post-injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports2014; 24: 377–385.
6.
McKeonJMBushHMReedA, et al. Return-to-play probabilities following new versus recurrent ankle sprains in high school athletes. J Sci Med Sport2014; 17: 23–28.
7.
ShawenSBDworakTAndersonRB.Return to play following ankle sprain and lateral ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med2016; 35: 697–709.
8.
BimaniSAAGatesLSWarnerM, et al. Factors influencing return to play following conservatively treated ankle sprain: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed2018; 47: 31–46.
9.
de NoronhaMLayEKMcPheeMR, et al. Ankle sprain has higher occurrence during the later parts of matches: systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sport Rehabil2018; 28(4): 1–25.
10.
BareldsIvan den BroekAGHuisstedeBMA. Ankle bracing is effective for primary and secondary prevention of acute ankle injuries in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Sports Med2018; 48: 2775–2784.
11.
DohertyCBleakleyCDelahuntE, et al. Treatment and prevention of acute and recurrent ankle sprain: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med2017; 51:113–125.
12.
FraserJJFegerMAHertelJ.Clinical commentary on midfoot and forefoot involvement in lateral ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. Part 2: clinical considerations. Int J Sports Phys Ther2016; 11: 1191–1203.
13.
KaseKWallisJKaseT.Clinical therapeutic applications of the kinesio taping method. 2nd ed.Tokio: Ken Ikai Co Ltd; 2003.
14.
LimECWTayMGX. Kinesio taping in musculoskeletal pain and disability that lasts for more than 4 weeks: is it time to peel off the tape and throw it out with the sweat? A systematic review with meta-analysis focused on pain and also methods of tape application. Br J Sports Med2015; 49: 1558–1566.
15.
ParreiraPdoCSCostaLdaCMHespanholLC, et al. Current evidence does not support the use of Kinesio Taping in clinical practice: a systematic review. J Physiother2014; 60: 31–39.
16.
NunesGSde NoronhaMVargasVZ, et al. How strong are the physiological theories on which Kinesio Taping is based?J Physiother2015; 61: 231–232.
17.
WangYGuYChenJ, et al. Kinesio taping is superior to other taping methods in ankle functional performance improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil2018; 32: 1472–1481.
18.
NunesGSde NoronhaM.Do we really have evidence that Kinesio taping improves ankle functional performance?Clin Rehabil2019; 33: 584–586.
19.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg2010; 8: 336–341.
20.
HigginsJThomasJ.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, http://handbook.cochrane.org (accessed 11 May 2019).
21.
MaherCGSherringtonCHerbertRD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther2003; 83: 713–721.
22.
SullivanGMFeinnR.Using effect size—or why the p value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ2012; 4: 279–282.
23.
HigginsJPTThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ2003; 327: 557–560.
24.
GuyattGHOxmanADVistGE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ2008; 336: 924–926.
HakseverBHarputGBaltaciG.Effect of kinesiotaping on static and dynamic balance during soccer. Med Sport2012; 65: 223–234.
27.
KimB-JLeeJ-HHanJ-T.The Immediate effect of ankle balance taping using kinesiology tape on the weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and the dynamic balance in asymptomatic subjects. J Korean Soc Phys Med2014; 9: 263–270.
28.
NakajimaMABaldridgeC.The effect of kinesio® tape on vertical jump and dynamic postural control. Int J Sports Phys Ther2013; 8: 393–406.
29.
NicholsDTRobinsonTLOranchukDJ.Kinesiology taping of the ankle does not improve dynamic balance in ncaa athletes. Athl Train Sports Health Care2019; 11: 10–18.
30.
NunesGSde NoronhaMCunhaHS, et al. Effect of kinesio taping on jumping and balance in athletes: a crossover randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res2013; 27: 3183–3189.
31.
ZulfikriNJustineM.Effects of kinesio® taping on dynamic balance following fatigue: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Res2017; 20: 16–22.
32.
ClineJFenwickATTurnerT, et al. Nonelastic and kinesio tex tapes improve perceived stability but not postural control in participants with chronic ankle instability. Int J Athl Ther Train2018; 23: 195–199.
33.
GehrkeLCLonderoLXLoureiro-ChavesRF, et al. Effects of athletic taping on performance of basketball athletes with chronic ankle instability. Rev Bras Med Esporte2018; 24: 477–482.
34.
HettleDLintonLBakerJS, et al. The effect of kinesiotaping on functional performance in chronic ankle instability - preliminary study. Clin Res Foot Ankle2013; 1: 105.
35.
KodeshEDarG.The effect of kinesiotape on dynamic balance following muscle fatigue in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Res Sports Med2015; 23: 367–378.
36.
LeeB-GLeeJ-H.Immediate effects of ankle balance taping with kinesiology tape on the dynamic balance of young players with functional ankle instability. Technol Health Care2015; 23: 333–341.
37.
SouzaHHPachecoIGehrkeLC, et al. Evaluation of the effect of elastic bandage on the ankle basketball players with and without chronic instability. Rev Bras Med Esporte2018; 24: 460–464.
38.
MohamedMARadwanNLAzabASR. Effect of kinesio-taping on ankle joint stability. International J Med Res & Health Sci2016; 5: 51–58.
39.
HadadiMHaghighatFMohammadpourN, et al. Effects of kinesiotape vs soft and semirigid ankle orthoses on balance in patients with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int2020; 41: 793–802.
40.
HadadiMHaghighatFSobhaniS.Can fibular reposition taping improve balance performance in individuals with chronic ankle instability? A randomized controlled trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract2020; 46: 102128.
41.
InglésMSerra-AñóPMéndezÀG, et al. Effect of Kinesio Taping and balance exercises on postural control in amateur soccer players: a randomised control trial. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 2853–2862.
42.
AndreoPKhalafKHealeL, et al. Effects of kinesiology tape on non-linear center of mass dispersion during the Y balance test. Front Physiol2018; 9: 1527.
43.
CorreiaCLopesSGonçalvesR, et al. Kinesiology taping does not change fibularis longus latency time and postural sway. J Bodyw Mov Ther2016; 20: 132–138.
44.
DanieleVAndreaPUgoM.Ankle elastic taping: stabilometric and electromyographic evaluation of postural control. Scienza Riabilitativa2015; 17: 21–28.
45.
RussoLBartolucciPArdigòLP, et al. An exploratory study on the acute effects of proprioceptive exercise and/or neuromuscular taping on balance performance. Asian J Sports Med2018; 9: e63020.
46.
SilvaAGCruzAGanesanM.A comparison of the effects of white athletic tape and kinesiotape on postural control in healthy individuals. Int J Ther Rehabil2015; 22: 160–165.
47.
CabreiraTSCoelhoKHVQuemeloPRV, et al. Kinesio Taping effect on postural balance in the elderly. Fisioter Pesqui2014; 21: 333–338.
48.
NaranjoERodríguez-FernándezAL.El método Kinesio taping mejora inmediatamente el equilibrio monopodal en deportistas mayores sanos. Fisioterapia2014; 36: 58–64.
49.
ShinY-JKimM-K.Immediate effect of ankle balance taping on dynamic and static balance of soccer players with acute ankle sprain. J Phys Ther Sci2017; 29: 622–624.
50.
ChoiH-SLeeJ-H.Immediate effect of balance taping using kinesiology tape on dynamic and static balance after ankle muscle fatigue. Healthcare2020; 8: 162.
51.
ShafizadeganZBaharloueiHKhoshaviO, et al. Evaluating the short-term effects of kinesiology taping and stretching of gastrocnemius on postural control: a randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther2020; 24: 196–201.
52.
LinC-CChenS-JLeeW-C, et al. Effects of different ankle supports on the single-leg lateral drop landing following muscle fatigue in athletes with functional ankle instability. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 3438.
53.
AkbariASarmadiAZafardaneshP.The effect of ankle taping and balance exercises on postural stability indices in healthy women. J Phys Ther Sci2014; 26: 763–769.
54.
AthanasiadisDPapadopoulosK.Comparison of proprioception between Kinesiology and adhesive ankle taping: a randomised experimental study. J Nov Physiother2019; 9: 406.
55.
BrogdenCMMarrinKPageRM, et al. The efficacy of elastic therapeutic tape variations on measures of ankle function and performance. Phys Ther Sport2018; 32: 74–79.
56.
FarquharsonCGreigM.Kinesiology tape mediates soccer-simulated and local peroneal fatigue in soccer players. Res Sports Med2017; 25: 313–321.
57.
GulsenMPekyavasNOAticiE, et al. Effects of kinesio taping on postural stability in young soccer players. Acta Med Mediterr2019; 35: 169–174.
58.
SempleSEsterhuysenCGraceJ.The effects of kinesio ankle taping on postural stability in semiprofessional rugby union players. J Phys Ther Sci2012; 24: 1239–1242.
59.
WilsonVDourisPFukurokuT, et al. The immediate and long-term effects of kinesiotape® on balance and functional performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther2016; 11: 247–253.
60.
de-la-Torre-DomingoCAlguacil-DiegoIMMolina-RuedaF, et al. Effect of kinesiology tape on measurements of balance in subjects with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96: 2169–2175.
61.
GökHAtarMOAteşC, et al. Does kinesiotaping affect standing balance in healthy individuals? A pilot, double-blind, randomized-controlled study. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil2019; 65: 327–234.
62.
YinLWangL.Acute effect of kinesiology taping on postural stability in individuals with unilateral chronic ankle instability. Front Physiol2020; 11: 192.
63.
ChangH-YHuangY-HChengS-C, et al. Prophylactic Kinesio taping enhances balance for healthy collegiate players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2018; 58: 651–658.
64.
LeeS-MLeeJ-H.The immediate effects of ankle balance taping with kinesiology tape on ankle active range of motion and performance in the Balance Error Scoring System. Phys Ther Sport2017; 25: 99–105.
65.
TekinDAgopyanABaltaciG.Balance training in modern dancers: proprioceptive-neuromuscular training vs kinesio taping. Med Probl Perform Art2018; 33: 156–165.
66.
SaltanABaltaciGAnkaraliH.Does Kinesio® taping improve balance and functional performance in older adults? A pilot study. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2019; 59: 1346–1352.
67.
AlghamdiAShawkiM.The effect of kinesio taping on balance control and functional performance in athletes with chronic ankle instability. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol2018; 10: 114–120.
68.
JacksonKSimonJEDochertyCL.Extended use of kinesiology tape and balance in participants with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train2016; 51: 16–21.
69.
BotsisAESchwarzNAHarperME, et al. Effect of kinesio® taping on ankle complex motion and stiffness and jump landing time to stabilization in female ballet dancers. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol2019; 4: 19.
70.
BoozariSSanjariMAAmiriA, et al. Effect of gastrocnemius kinesio taping on countermovement jump performance and vertical stiffness following muscle fatigue. J Sport Rehabil2018; 27: 306–311.
71.
ChaneyCHirayamaGMMendozaTE, et al. The effects of Kinesio tape on vertical jump, 20-m sprint, and self-perception of performance in high school basketball players. Curr Orthop Pract2015; 26: 420–424.
72.
CheungRTHYauQKCWongK, et al. Kinesiology tape does not promote vertical jumping performance: a deceptive crossover trial. Man Ther2016; 21: 89–93.
73.
EomSYLeeWJLeeJI, et al. The effect of ankle Kinesio taping on range of motion and agility during exercise in university students. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci2014; 3: 63–68.
74.
FirthBLDingleyPDaviesER, et al. The effect of kinesiotape on function, pain, and motoneuronal excitability in healthy people and people with Achilles tendinopathy. Clin J Sport Med2010; 20: 416–421.
75.
HuangC-YHsiehT-HLuS-C, et al. Effect of the Kinesio tape to muscle activity and vertical jump performance in healthy inactive people. Biomed Eng Online2011; 10: 70.
76.
MarcolinGBurianiAGiacomelliA, et al. Neuromuscular taping application in counter movement jump: biomechanical insight in a group of healthy basketball players. Eur J Transl Myol2017; 27: 130–135.
77.
SchifferTMöllingerASperlichB, et al. Kinesio taping and jump performance in elite female track and field athletes and jump performance in elite female track and field athletes. J Sport Rehabil2015; 24: 47–50.
78.
TsaiF-HChuI-HHuangC-H, et al. Effects of taping on achilles tendon protection and kendo performance. J Sport Rehabil2018; 27: 157–164.
79.
LeeHLimH.Effects of double-taped kinesio taping on pain and functional performance due to muscle fatigue in young males: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 2364.
80.
JayaseelanVKSenthilPRathnamalaD, et al. A study to compare the effectiveness of Kinesio taping versus contract relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching of plantar flexors flexibility in amateur badminton players. Drug Invent Today2020; 14: 27–30.
81.
Gómez-SorianoJAbián-VicénJAparicio-GarcíaC, et al. The effects of Kinesio taping on muscle tone in healthy subjects: a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Man Ther2014; 19: 131–136.
82.
Martínez-GramageJMerino-RamirezMAAmer-CuencaJJ, et al. Effect of Kinesio Taping on gastrocnemius activity and ankle range of movement during gait in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Sport2016; 18: 56–61.
83.
Merino-MarbanRFernandez-RodriguezEMayorga-VegaD.The effect of kinesio taping on calf pain and extensibility immediately after its application and after a duathlon competition. Res Sports Med2014; 22: 1–11.
84.
Merino-MarbanRMayorga-VegaDFernandez-RodriguezE.Effect of kinesio tape application on calf pain and ankle range of motion in duathletes. J Hum Kinet2013; 37: 129–135.
85.
SarvestanJSvobodaZ.Acute effect of ankle kinesio- and athletic taping on ankle range of motion during various agility tests in athletes with chronic ankle sprain. J Sport Rehabil2019; 29(5): 527–532.
86.
YenS-CFolmarEFriendKA, et al. Effects of kinesiotaping and athletic taping on ankle kinematics during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a pilot study. Gait Posture2018; 66: 118–123.
87.
ShimojoHNaraRBabaY, et al. Does ankle joint flexibility affect underwater kicking efficiency and three-dimensional kinematics?J Sports Sci2019; 37: 2339–2346.
88.
BaileyDFirthP.Does kinesiology taping of the ankles affect proprioceptive control in professional football (soccer) players?Phys Ther Sport2017; 25: 94–98.
89.
HalsethTMcChesneyJWDebelisoM, et al. The effects of kinesioTM taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med2004; 3: 1–7.
90.
LongZWangRHanJ, et al. Optimizing ankle performance when taped: effects of kinesiology and athletic taping on proprioception in full weight-bearing stance. J Sci Med Sport2017; 20: 236–240.
91.
MirallesIMonterdeSdel RíoO, et al. Has kinesio tape effects on ankle proprioception? A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Kinesiology2014; 68: 9–18.
92.
ElshemySABattechaKH.Kinesio taping versus proprioceptive training on dynamic position sense of the ankle and eversion to inversion strength ratios in children with functional ankle instability. Med J Cairo Univ2013; 81: 61–68.
93.
AbubakerAAMuaidiQI.The Effect of the inhibition technique of the kinesio taping on the triceps surae muscle after an isokinetic fatigue protocol. MOJ Orthop Rheumatol2018; 10: 384.
94.
MagalhãesIBottaroMMezzaraneRA, et al. Kinesiotaping enhances the rate of force development but not the neuromuscular efficiency of physically active young men. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2016; 28: 123–129.
95.
StedgeHLKroskieRMDochertyCL.Kinesio taping and the circulation and endurance ratio of the gastrocnemius muscle. J Athl Train2012; 47: 635–642.
96.
BagheriRPourahmadiMRSarmadiAR, et al. What is the effect and mechanism of kinesiology tape on muscle activity?J Bodyw Mov Ther2018; 22: 266–275.
97.
BriemKEythörsdöttirHMagnúsdóttirRG, et al. Effects of kinesio tape compared with nonelastic sports tape and the untaped ankle during a sudden inversion perturbation in male athletes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2011; 41: 328–335.
98.
TremblayFKaramS.Kinesio-taping application and corticospinal excitability at the ankle joint. J Athl Train2015; 50: 840–846.
99.
Vera-GarcíaFJMartínez-GramageJSan MiguelR, et al. Effect of Kinesio taping on reflex response of biceps femoris and gastrocnemius lateralis. Fisioterapia2010; 32: 4–10.
100.
SlevinZMArnoldGPWangW, et al. Immediate effect of kinesiology tape on ankle stability. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine2020; 6: e000604.
101.
AnHMMillerCGMcelveenM, et al. The effect of kinesio tape® on lower extremity functional movement screenTM scores. Int J Exerc Sci2012; 5: 196–204.
102.
MüllerCBrandesM.Effect of kinesiotape applications on ball velocity and accuracy in amateur soccer and handball. J Hum Kinet2015; 49: 119–129.
103.
Pérez-SorianoPLucas-CuevasAGAparicio-AparicioI, et al. Effects of Kinesiotape® taping on plantar pressure and impact acceleration during walking. Sci Sports2014; 29: 282–287.
104.
AcarYAYilmazBKKaradenizM, et al. Kinesiotaping vs elastic bandage in acute ankle sprains in emergency department: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Gülhane Tıp Derg2015; 57: 44–48.
105.
KimMKShinYJ.Immediate effects of ankle balance taping with kinesiology tape for amateur soccer players with lateral ankle sprain: a randomized cross-over design. Med Sci Monit2017; 23: 5534–5541.
106.
KuyucuEGülençBBiçerH, et al. Assessment of the kinesiotherapy’s efficacy in male athletes with calcaneal apophysitis. J Orthop Surg Res2017; 12: 146.
107.
MazloumVSahebozamaniM.The effects kinesiotaping® and proprioceptive exercises in rehabilitation management of volleyball players with chronic ankle instability. J Jahrom Univ Med Sci2016; 14: 31–41.
108.
SarvestanJAlaeiFKazemiNS, et al. Agility profile in collegiate athletes with chronic ankle sprain: the effect of Athletic and Kinesio taping among both genders. Sport Sci Health2018; 14: 407–414.
109.
ShinJ-CKimJ-HNamD, et al. Add-on effect of kinesiotape in patients with acute lateral ankle sprain: a randomized controlled trial. Trials2020; 21: 176.
110.
BenderRBunceCClarkeM, et al. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol2008; 61: 857–865.
111.
ChalmersTCCelanoPSacksHS, et al. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med1983; 309: 1358–1361.
112.
ColditzGAMillerJNMostellerF.How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical. Stat Med1989; 8: 441–454.
113.
MoherDPhamBJonesA, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Lancet1998; 352: 609–613.
114.
SchulzKFChalmersIHayesRJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA1995; 273: 408–412.
115.
NelsonNL.Kinesio taping for chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther2016; 20: 672–681.
116.
Luz JúniorMADAlmeidaMODSantosRS, et al. Effectiveness of kinesio taping in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Spine2019; 44: 68–78.
117.
Ramírez-VélezRHormazábal-AguayoIIzquierdoM, et al. Effects of kinesio taping alone versus sham taping in individuals with musculoskeletal conditions after intervention for at least one week: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy2019; 150: 412–420.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
