To investigate the effectiveness of trunk training on trunk control, sitting and standing balance and mobility.
Data sources:
PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Cochrane Library, Rehab+ and ScienceDirect were searched until January 2019.
Review methods:
Randomized controlled trials were included if they investigated the effect of trunk exercises on balance and gait after stroke. Four reviewers independently screened and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment with the PEDro scale. Disagreements were resolved by a fifth independent reviewer. A meta-analysis was performed to quantitatively describe the results.
Results:
After screening of 1881 studies, 22 studies and 394 participants met the inclusion criteria. Trunk training was executed as core stability, reaching, weight-shift or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercises. The amount of therapy varied from a total of 3–36 hours between studies. The median PEDro score was 6 out of 10 which corresponds with a low risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model due to differences in study population, interventions received and follow-up length. The overall treatment effect was large for trunk control standardized mean differences (SMD) 1.08 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96–1.31), standing balance SMD 0.84 (95% CI: 0.04–0.98) and mobility SMD 0.88 (95% CI: 0.67–1.09).
Conclusions:
In patients suffering from stroke, there is a strong amount of evidence showing that trunk training is able to improve trunk control, sitting and standing balance and mobility.
EngJJTangPF.Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: a synthesis of the evidence. Expert Rev Neurother2007; 7(10): 1417–1436.
2.
KrakauerJWCarmichaelSTCorbettDet al. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2012; 26(8): 923–931.
3.
MurphyTHCorbettD.Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci2009; 10(12): 861–872.
4.
VerheydenGVereeckLTruijenSet al. Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability. Clin Rehabil2006; 20(5): 451–458.
5.
FranchignoniFPTesioLRicuperoCet al. Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome. Stroke1997; 28(7): 1382–1385.
6.
Cabanas-ValdesRCuchiGUBagur-CalafatC.Trunk training exercises approaches for improving trunk performance and functional sitting balance in patients with stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabilitation2013; 33(4): 575–592.
7.
AlhwoaimelNTurkRWarnerMet al. Do trunk exercises improve trunk and upper extremity performance, post stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabilitation2018; 43(4): 395–412.
8.
BankJCharlesKMorganP.What is the effect of additional physiotherapy on sitting balance following stroke compared to standard physiotherapy treatment: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil2016; 23(1): 15–25.
9.
SorinolaIOPowisIWhiteCM.Does additional exercise improve trunk function recovery in stroke patients? A meta-analysis. Neurorehabilitation2014; 35(2): 205–213.
10.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJet al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther2009; 89(9): 873.
11.
MaherCGSherringtonCHerbertRDet al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther2003; 83(8): 713–721.
HigginsJPTGreenS (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org.
14.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum Associates, 1988. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
AnSHParkDS.The effects of trunk exercise on mobility, balance and trunk control of stroke patients. J Korean Soc Phys Med2017; 12(1): 25–33.
16.
Cabanas-ValdesRBagur-CalafatCGirabent-FarresMet al. The effect of additional core stability exercises on improving dynamic sitting balance and trunk control for subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2016; 30(10): 1024–1033.
17.
ChanBKNgSSNgGY.A home-based program of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and task-related trunk training improves trunk control in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2015; 29(1): 70–79.
18.
DeanCMShepherdRB.Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. Stroke1997; 28(4): 722–728.
19.
DeanCMChannonEFHallJM.Sitting training early after stroke improves sitting ability and quality and carries over to standing up but not to walking: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother2007; 53(2): 97–102.
20.
Dell’UomoDMoroneGCentrellaAet al. Effects of scapulohumeral rehabilitation protocol on trunk control recovery in patients with subacute stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation2017; 40(3): 337–343.
21.
HaruyamaKKawakamiMOtsukaT.Effect of Core Stability Training on Trunk Function, Standing Balance, and Mobility in Stroke Patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2017; 31(3): 240–249.
22.
JungKKimYChungYet al. Weight-shift training improves trunk control, proprioception, and balance in patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med2014; 232(3): 195–199.
23.
JungKSJungJHInTSet al. Effects of weight-shifting exercise combined with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on muscle activity and trunk control in patients with stroke. Occup Ther Int2016; 23(4): 436–443.
24.
KarthikbabuSChakrapaniMGanesanSet al. Efficacy of trunk regimes on balance, mobility, physical function, and community reintegration in chronic stroke: a parallel-group randomized trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2018; 27(4): 1003–1011.
25.
KoEJChunMHKimDYet al. The additive effects of core muscle strengthening and trunk NMES on trunk balance in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med2016; 40(1): 142–151.
26.
RoseSVasanthanR.Effect of trunk strengthening exercise on functional outcome in post stroke patients. Int J Curr Res2016; 8(6): 33658–33665.
27.
SaeysWVereeckLTruijenSet al. Randomized controlled trial of truncal exercises early after stroke to improve balance and mobility. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2012; 26(3): 231–238.
28.
VerheydenGVereeckLTruijenSet al. Additional exercises improve trunk performance after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2009; 23(3): 281–286.
29.
ChungEJKimJHLeeBH.The effects of core stabilization exercise on dynamic balance and gait function in stroke patients. J Phy Ther Sci2013; 25(7): 803–806.
30.
KimYKimEGongW.The effects of trunk stability exercise using PNF on the functional reach test and muscle activities of stroke patients. J Phys Therap Sci2011; 23: 699–702.
31.
LeeYWLeeJHShinSSet al. The effect of dual motor task training while sitting on trunk control ability and balance of patients with chronic stroke. J Phys Therap Sci2011; 24(4): 345–349.
32.
MudieMHWinzeler-MercayURadwanSet al. Training symmetry of weight distribution after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing task-related reach, Bobath and feedback training approaches. Clin Rehabil2002; 16(6): 582–592.
33.
SunXGaoQDouHet al. Which is better in the rehabilitation of stroke patients, core stability exercises or conventional exercises?J Phy Ther Sci2016; 28(4): 1131–1133.
34.
VijayakumarKKarthikbabuSNayakA.Additional trunk training improves sitting balance following acute stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Curr Res Rev2011; 2(3): 26–43.
35.
YooSDJeongYSKimDHet al. The efficacy of core strengthening on the trunk balance in patients with subacute stroke. Ann Rehab Med2010; 34(6): 677–682.
36.
YuSHParkSD.The effects of core stability strength exercise on muscle activity and trunk impairment scale in stroke patients. J Exerc Rehabil2013; 9(3): 362–367.
37.
VerheydenGKerstenP.Investigating the internal validity of the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) using Rasch analysis: the TIS 2.0. Disabil Rehabil2010; 32(25): 2127–2137.
KarthikbabuSChakrapaniMGaneshanSet al. A review on assessment and treatment of the trunk in stroke: a need or luxury. Neural Regen Res2012; 7(25): 1974–1977.
40.
KiblerWBPressJSciasciaA.The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med2006; 36(3): 189–198.
41.
ChuterVHde JongeXAJ. Proximal and distal contributions to lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Gait Posture2012; 36(1): 7–15.
42.
ChungEJ.The effects of core stabilization exercise on dynamic balance and gait function in stroke patients. J Phy Ther Sci2013; 25(7): 803–806.
43.
LevinMFKleimJAWolfSL.What do motor ‘recovery’ and ‘compensation’ mean in patients following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2009; 23(4): 313–319.
44.
Van CriekingeTTruijenSVerbruggenCet al. The effect of trunk training on muscle thickness and muscle activity: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil2018; 5: 1–9.
45.
LiuTTLeiMJLiuYQet al. Effects of core stability exercise on rehabilitation in stroke patients with hemiplegia: a meta-analysis. TMR Non-Drug Therapy2018; 1(2): 41–52.
46.
VerheydenGNieuwboerADe WitLet al. Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2008; 22(2): 173–179.
47.
Van CriekingeTSaeysWVereeckLet al. Are unstable support surfaces superior to stable support surfaces during trunk rehabilitation after stroke? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil2018; 40(17): 1981–1988.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
