The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) includes determining the effects of core training alone or combined with conventional therapy on trunk function, balance, and gait in stroke patients; analysing these effects considering the stroke stage and the core training type; establishing the methodological quality of the studies published to date; and knowing the best dosage and type of exercise these aspects.
Data source
Cochrane Library, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct were searched from inception to January 2022.
Review method
A review and meta-analysis of RCTs about core intervention effects on trunk function, balance, and gait in stroke patients was carried out following the Preferred Items for Reporting in Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias and internal validity of the included studies.
Results
Twenty-nine studies were included (1030 stroke patients). The mean age of the participants was 58.46 ± 9.89 years, and the average time since the stroke incident was 308.64 ± 175.52 days. The meta-analysis results showed significant improvements in core interventions for trunk function (P ≤ 0.008) and balance (P < 0.00001) but not for gait performance (P = 0.11 in chronic and P = 0.06 in pooled cases). In relation to the differential meta-analysis between training performed on stable and unstable surfaces, no significant differences were found in trunk function (P = 0.06) or balance measures (P = 0.05).
Conclusion
Core training improves trunk function and balance in acute and chronic patients, but no changes were found in gait performance.
KatanMLuftA. Global burden of stroke. Semin Neurol2018; 38: 208–211.
3.
Virani SalimSAlonsoABenjamin EmeliaJ, et al.Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation2020; 141: e139–e596.
4.
TruelsenTPiechowski-JóźwiakBBonitaR,et al.Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. Eur J Neurol2006; 13: 581–598.
5.
MessierSBourbonnaisDDesrosiersJ,et al.Dynamic analysis of trunk flexion after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 1619–1624.
6.
SouzaDCBde Sales SantosMda Silva RibeiroNM,et al.Inpatient trunk exercises after recent stroke: an update meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. NeuroRehabilitation2019; 44: 369–377.
7.
HaruyamaKKawakamiMOtsukaT. Effect of core stability training on trunk function, standing balance, and mobility in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2017; 31: 240–249.
8.
SharmaVKaurJ. Effect of core strengthening with pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk, balance, gait, and function in chronic stroke. J Exerc Rehabil2017; 13: 200–205.
9.
ChenXGanZTianW,et al.Effects of rehabilitation training of core muscle stability on stroke patients with hemiplegia. Pak J Med Sci2020; 36: 461–466.
10.
ParkHKLeeHJLeeSJ,et al.Land-based and aquatic trunk exercise program improve trunk control, balance and activities of daily living ability in stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2019; 55: 687–694.
11.
LeeNGYouJSHYiCH, et al.Best core stabilization for anticipatory postural adjustment and falls in hemiparetic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2018; 99: 2168–2174.
12.
Cabanas-ValdésRBagur-CalafatCGirabent-FarrésM, et al.The effect of additional core stability exercises on improving dynamic sitting balance and trunk control for subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2016; 30: 1024–1033.
13.
BankJCharlesKMorganP. What is the effect of additional physiotherapy on sitting balance following stroke compared to standard physiotherapy treatment: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil2016; 23: 15–25.
14.
ChungEJKimJHLeeBH. The effects of core stabilization exercise on dynamic balance and gait function in stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci2013; 25: 803–806.
15.
YuSHParkSD. The effects of core stability strength exercise on muscle activity and trunk impairment scale in stroke patients. J Exerc Rehabil2013; 9: 362–367.
16.
Cabrera–MartosIOrtiz–RubioATorres–SánchezI,et al.The effectiveness of core exercising for postural control in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PM&R2020; 12: 1157–1168.
17.
Cabanas-ValdésRCuchiGUBagur-CalafatC. Trunk training exercises approaches for improving trunk performance and functional sitting balance in patients with stroke: a systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation2013; 33: 575–592.
18.
Van CriekingeTTruijenSSchröderJ, et al.The effectiveness of trunk training on trunk control, sitting and standing balance and mobility post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil2019; 33: 992–1002.
19.
GambleKChiuAPeirisC. Core stability exercises in addition to usual care physiotherapy improve stability and balance after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2021; 102: 762–775.
20.
RathoreMTrivediSAbrahamJ,et al.Anatomical correlation of core muscle activation in different yogic postures. Int J Yoga2017; 10: 59–66.
21.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ and PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009; 6: e1000097.
22.
Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano. Manual Cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas de intervenciones, versión 5.1.0 [actualizado en marzo de 2011]. Barcelona. 2012.
23.
McHughML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb)2012; 22: 276–282.
24.
CohenJ. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull1968; 70: 213–220.
25.
Review Manager (RevMan 5.3). Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. 2014.
26.
RosenthalRRosnowRL. Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (2nd ed.) [Internet]. New York: McGraw Hill; 1991. Available from: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/34945148.
27.
HigginsJPTThompsonSGDeeksJJ,et al.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J2003; 327: 557–560.
28.
HigginsJPTThompsonSG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med2002; 21: 1539–1558.
29.
DeeksJJHigginsJPTAltmanDG and Group of behalf of the CSM. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. [Internet]. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2019 [cited 2022 Jul 12]. 241–84 p. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-10.
30.
AnSParkDS. The Effects of Trunk Exercise on Mobility, Balance and Trunk Control of Stroke Patients. 2017.
31.
BaeSHLeeHGKimYE,et al.Effects of trunk stabilization exercises on different support surfaces on the cross-sectional area of the trunk muscles and balance ability. J Phys Ther Sci2013; 25: 741–745.
32.
BüyükavcıRŞahinFSağS,et al.The impact of additional trunk balance exercises on balance, functional condition and ambulation in early stroke patients: randomized controlled trial. Turk J Phys Med Rehab2016; 62: 248–256.
33.
ChitraJRishabhS. A comparative study on the effectiveness of core stability exercise and pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on balance, motor recovery and function in hemiparetic patients: a randomized clinical trial. Rom J Physiother2015; 21: 12–18.
34.
DubeyLKarthikbabuSMohanD. Effects of pelvic stability training on movement control, hip muscles strength, walking speed and daily activities after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Neurosci2018; 25: 80–89.
35.
JungJChoiWLeeS. Trunk stabilization training using visual feedback on an unstable surface improves balance and trunk stability of chronic stroke patients. Med Sci Technol2015; 56: 37–42.
36.
JungKKimYChungY,et al.Weight-shift training improves trunk control, proprioception, and balance in patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med2014; 232: 195–199.
37.
JungKSChoHYInTS. Trunk exercises performed on an unstable surface improve trunk muscle activation, postural control, and gait speed in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci2016; 28: 940–944.
38.
KarthikbabuSNayakAVijayakumarK, et al.Comparison of physio ball and plinth trunk exercises regimens on trunk control and functional balance in patients with acute stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2011; 25: 709–719.
39.
KılınçMAvcuFOnursalO,et al.The effects of Bobath-based trunk exercises on trunk control, functional capacity, balance, and gait: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil2016; 23: 50–58.
40.
LeeJSLeeHG. Effects of sling exercise therapy on trunk muscle activation and balance in chronic hemiplegic patients. J Phys Ther Sci2014; 26: 655–659.
41.
LeeHJKangTWKimBR. Effects of diaphragm and deep abdominal muscle exercise on walking and balance ability in patients with hemiplegia due to stroke. J Exerc Rehabil2018; 14: 648–653.
42.
MinJHSeongHYKoSH, et al.Effects of trunk stabilization training robot on postural control and gait in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res2020; 43: 159–166.
43.
MoonSJKimTH. Effect of three-dimensional spine stabilization exercise on trunk muscle strength and gait ability in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation2017; 41: 151–159.
44.
RoseSRajagopalanV. Effect of trunk strengthening exercise on functional outcome in post stroke patients. Int J Curr Res2016; 8: 33658–33665.
45.
SaeysWVereeckLTruijenS,et al.Randomized controlled trial of truncal exercises early after stroke to improve balance and mobility. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2012; 26: 231–238.
46.
SarwarRFaizanMAhmedU,et al.Effects of unstable and stable trunk exercise programs on trunk motor performance, balance and functional mobility in stroke patients. Rawal Med J2019; 44: 20–23.
47.
ShinDCSongCH. Smartphone-Based visual feedback trunk control training using a gyroscope and mirroring technology for stroke patients: single-blinded, randomized clinical trial of efficacy and feasibility. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2016; 95: 319–329.
48.
Sung-PilCKyung-YoonKTae-GyeongK,et al.A study on core stability training for postural control ability and respiratory function in patients with chronic stroke. Int J Biosci Bio-Technol2015; 7: 83–90.
49.
VerheydenGVereeckLTruijenS, et al.Additional exercises improve trunk performance after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2009; 23: 281–286.
50.
VijayakumarKKarthikbabuSNayakA. Additional trunk training improves sitting balance following acute stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Curr Res Rev2010; 2: 26–43.
51.
YooSJeongYKimD, et al.The efficacy of core strengthening on the trunk balance in patients with subacute stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med2010; 34: 677–682.
52.
Di MonacoMTruccoMDi MonacoR,et al.The relationship between initial trunk control or postural balance and inpatient rehabilitation outcome after stroke: a prospective comparative study. Clin Rehabil2010; 24: 543–554.
53.
KaratasMCetinNBayramogluM,et al.Trunk muscle strength in relation to balance and functional disability in unihemispheric stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2004; 83: 81–87.
54.
PeterkaRJ. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol2002; 88: 1097–1118.
55.
EbenbichlerGROddssonLIKollmitzerJ,et al.Sensory-motor control of the lower back: implications for rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc2001; 33: 1889–1898.
56.
HodgesPW. Core stability exercise in chronic low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am2003; 34: 245–254.
57.
KahleNTevaldMA. Core muscle strengthening’s improvement of balance performance in community-dwelling older adults: a pilot study. J Aging Phys Act2014; 22: 65–73.
58.
BehmDGAndersonKCurnewRS. Muscle force and activation under stable and unstable conditions. J Strength Cond Res2002; 16: 416–422.
59.
MurphyTHCorbettD. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci2009; 10: 861–872.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
