Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-5
The effect and optimal parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on limb movement recovery post-stroke and cortex excitability, to explore the optimal parameters of rTMS and suitable stroke population. Second, adverse events were also included.
Data sources:
The databases of PubMed, EBSCO, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EBM Reviews-Cochrane Database, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Chinese Science and Technology Journals Database were searched for randomized controlled trials exploring the effects of rTMS on limb motor function recovery post-stroke before December 2018.
Review methods:
The effect sizes of rTMS on limb motor recovery, the effect size of rTMS stimulation parameters, and different stroke population were summarized by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the 95% confidence interval using fixed/random effect models as appropriate.
Results:
For the motor function assessment, 42 eligible studies involving 1168 stroke patients were identified. The summary effect size indicated that rTMS had positive effects on limb motor recovery (SMD = 0.50, P < 0.00001) and activities of daily living (SMD = 0.82, P < 0.00001), and motor-evoked potentials of the stimulated hemisphere differed according to the stimulation frequency, that is, the high-frequency group (SMD = 0.57, P = 0.0006), except the low-frequency group (SMD = –0.27, P = 0.05). No significant differences were observed among the stimulation parameter subgroups except for the sessions subgroup (P = 0.02). Only 10 included articles reported transient mild discomfort after rTMS.
Conclusions:
rTMS promoted the recovery of limb motor function and changed the cortex excitability. rTMS may be better for early and pure subcortical stroke patients. Regarding different stimulation parameters, the number of stimulation sessions has an impact on the effect of rTMS.
VeerbeekJMKwakkelGvan WegenEEet al. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke2011; 42: 1482–1488.
2.
HummelFCCohenLG.Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?Lancet Neurol2006; 5(8): 708–712.
3.
HaoZWangDZengYet al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 5: CD008862.
4.
ZhangLXingGFanYet al. Short- and long-term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil2017; 31(9): 1137–1153.
5.
PellGSRothYZangenA.Modulation of cortical excitability induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: influence of timing and geometrical parameters and underlying mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol2011; 93(1): 59–98.
6.
Lüdemann-PodubeckáJBöslKTheiligSet al. The effectiveness of 1Hz rTMS over the primary motor area of the unaffected hemisphere to improve hand function after stroke depends on hemispheric dominance. Brain Stimul2015; 8(4): 823–830.
7.
LiepertJZittelSWeillerC.Improvement of dexterity by single session low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in acute stroke: a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci2007; 25(5–6): 461–465.
8.
TakeuchiNTadaTToshimaMet al. Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1 Hz repetitive transcranical magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med2008; 40(4): 298–303.
9.
WangCCWangCPTsaiPYet al. Inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional premotor and primary motor cortices facilitate poststroke motor recovery. Restor Neurol Neurosci2014; 32(6): 825–835.
10.
RoseDKPattenCMcGuirkTEet al. Does inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augment functional task practice to improve arm recovery in chronic stroke?Stroke Res Treat2014; 2014: 305236.
11.
TheiligSPodubeckaJBoslKet al. Functional neuromuscular stimulation to improve severe hand dysfunction after stroke: does inhibitory rTMS enhance therapeutic efficiency?Exp Neurol2011; 230(1): 149–155.
12.
KhedrEMEtrabyAEHemedaMet al. Long-term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand2010; 121(1): 30–37.
13.
TalelliPGreenwoodRJRothwellJC.Exploring theta burst stimulation as an intervention to improve motor recovery in chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol2007; 118(2): 333–342.
14.
AmeliMGrefkesCKemperFet al. Differential effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex in cortical and subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Ann Neurol2009; 66(3): 298–309.
15.
GuoZJinYPengHet al. Ipsilesional high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation add-on therapy improved diffusion parameters of stroke patients with motor dysfunction: a preliminary DTI study. Neural Plast2016; 2016: 6238575.
16.
KoskiLMernarTJDobkinBH.Immediate and long-term changes in corticomotor output in response to rehabilitation: correlation with functional improvements in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2004; 18(4): 230–249.
17.
O’BrienATBertolucciFTorrealba-AcostaGet al. Non-invasive brain stimulation for fine motor improvement after stroke: a meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol2018; 25(8): 1017–1026.
18.
GraefPDadaltMLRSteinCet al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with upper-limb training for improving function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci2016; 369: 149–158.
19.
DuJTianLLiuWet al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery and motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Neurol2016; 23(11): 1666–1672.
20.
KhedrEMAbdel-FadeilMRFarghaliAet al. Role of 1 and 3 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol2009; 16(12): 1323–1330.
21.
SasakiNMizutaniSKakudaWet al. Comparison of the effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb hemiparesis in the early phase of stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2013; 22(4): 413–418.
22.
HsuYFHuangYZLinYYet al. Intermittent theta burst stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex of subacute ischemic stroke patients: a pilot study. Brain Stimul2013; 6(2): 166–174.
23.
WangC-PTsaiP-YYangTFet al. Differential Effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery. CNS Neurosci Ther2014; 20(4): 355–363.
24.
TalelliPWallaceADileoneMet al. Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2012; 26(8): 976–987.
25.
AckerleySJStinearCMBarberPAet al. Combining theta burst stimulation with training after subcortical stroke. Stroke2010; 41(7): 1568–1572.
26.
ConfortoABAnjosSMSaposnikGet al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in mild to severe hemiparesis early after stroke: a proof of principle and novel approach to improve motor function. J Neurol2011; 259(7): 1399–1405.
27.
Di LazzaroVRothwellJCTalelliPet al. Inhibitory theta burst stimulation of affected hemisphere in chronic stroke: a proof of principle, sham-controlled study. Neurosci Lett2013; 553: 148–152.
28.
EmaraTHMoustafaRRElnahasNMet al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at 1Hz and 5Hz produces sustained improvement in motor function and disability after ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol2010; 17(9): 1203–1209.
29.
LefaucheurJ-PAndré-ObadiaNAntalAet al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol2014; 125(11): 2150–2206.
30.
RossiSHallettMRossiniPMet al. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol2009; 120(12): 2008–2039.
31.
YozbatiranNAlonsoalonsoMSeeJet al. Safety and behavioral effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke. Stroke2009; 40(1): 309–312.
32.
GillickBTKrachLEFeymaTet al. Primed low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and constraint-induced movement therapy in pediatric hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol2014; 56(1): 44–52.
33.
GillickBTKrachLEFeymaTet al. Safety of primed repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and modified constraint-induced movement therapy in a randomized controlled trial in pediatric hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96(4 suppl.): S104–S113.
34.
KirtonAChenRFriefeldSet al. Contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic hemiparesis in subcortical paediatric stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol2008; 7(6): 507–513.
35.
ElkinsMRMoseleyAMSherringtonCet al. Growth in the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and use of the PEDro scale. Br J Sports Med2013; 47(4): 188–189.
36.
BhogalSKTeasellRWFoleyNCet al. The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad scale in stroke rehabilitation literature. J Clin Epidemiol2005; 58(7): 668–673.
37.
MaherCGSherringtonCHerbertRDet al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther2003; 83(8): 713–721.
LeQQuYTaoYet al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on hand function recovery and excitability of the motor cortex after stroke: a meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2014; 93(5): 422–430.
40.
PisegnaJMKaneokaAPearsonWGet al. Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Neurophysiol2016; 127(1): 956–968.
41.
YangSNPyunSBKimHJet al. Effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation in dysphagia subsequent to stroke: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Dysphagia2015; 30(4): 383–391.
42.
HigginsJPT. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008, pp.102–108.
43.
AckerleySJStinearCMBarberPAet al. Priming sensorimotor cortex to enhance task-specific training after subcortical stroke. Clin Neurophysiol2014; 125(7): 1451–1458.
44.
DafotakisMGrefkesCEickhoffSBet al. Effects of rTMS on grip force control following subcortical stroke. Exp Neurol2008; 211(2): 407–412.
45.
EtohSNomaTIkedaKet al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on repetitive facilitation exercises of the hemiplegic hand in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med2013; 45(9): 843–847.
46.
MansurCGFregniFBoggioPSet al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology2005; 64(10): 1802–1804.
47.
NowakDAGrefkesCDafotakisMet al. Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. Arch Neurol2008; 65(6): 741–747.
48.
SungWHWangCPChouCLet al. Efficacy of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor recovery in hemiplegic stroke patients. Stroke2013; 44(5): 1375–1382.
49.
HosomiKMorrisSSakamotoTet al. Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke upper limb paresis in the subacute period. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2016; 25(7): 1655–1664.
50.
SasakiNAboMHaraTet al. High-frequency rTMS on leg motor area in the early phase of stroke. Acta Neurol Belg2017; 117(1): 189–194.
51.
ZhaoNZhangJQiuMet al. Scalp acupuncture plus low-frequency rTMS promotes repair of brain white matter tracts in stroke patients: a DTI study. J Integr Neurosci2018; 17: 61–69.
52.
HuangYZLinLFChangKHet al. Priming with 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over contralesional leg motor cortex does not increase the rate of regaining ambulation within 3 months of stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2018; 97(5): 339–345.
53.
GuanYZLiJZhangXWet al. Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) after acute stroke: a one-year longitudinal randomized trial. CNS Neurosci Ther2017; 23: 940–946.
54.
RastgooMNaghdiSAnsariNNet al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity spasticity and motor function in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil2016; 38(19): 1918–1926.
55.
ZhengCJLiaoWJ and WG. Effect of combined low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and virtual reality training on upper limb function in subacute stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trail. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol2015; 35(2): 248–254.
56.
BlesneagASlăvoacăDPopaLet al. Low-frequency rTMS in patients with subacute ischemic stroke: clinical evaluation of short and long-term outcomes and neurophysiological assessment of cortical excitability. J Med Life2015; 8(3): 378–387.
57.
TakeuchiNChumaTMatsuoYet al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke2005; 36(12): 2681–2686.
58.
LomarevMPKimDYRichardsonSPet al. Safety study of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol2007; 118(9): 2072–2075.
59.
Ludemann-PodubeckaJBoslKNowakDA.Inhibition of the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex improves motor function of the affected hand following stroke. Eur J Neurol2016; 23(4): 823–830.
60.
MalcolmMPTriggsWJLightKEet al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunct to constraint-induced therapy: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2007; 86(9): 707–715.
61.
PomeroyVMCloudGTallisRCet al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and muscle contraction to enhance stroke recovery: a randomized proof-of-principle and feasibility investigation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2007; 21(6): 509–517.
62.
FregniFBoggioPSValleACet al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke2006; 37(8): 2115–2122.
63.
AvenantiACocciaMLadavasEet al. Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial. Neurology2012; 78(4): 256–64.
64.
MatsuuraAOnodaKOguroHet al. Magnetic stimulation and movement-related cortical activity for acute stroke with hemiparesis. Eur J Neurol2015; 22(12): 1526–1532.
65.
ChangWHKimYHYooWKet al. RTMS with motor training modulates cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci2012; 30(3): 179–189.
66.
RehmeAKGrefkesC.Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging-based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans. J Physiol2013; 591(1): 17–31.
67.
GrefkesCWardNS.Cortical reorganization after stroke: how much and how functional?Neuroscientist2014; 20(1): 56–70.
68.
LiuGDangCChenXet al. Structural remodeling of white matter in the contralesional hemisphere is correlated with early motor recovery in patients with subcortical infarction. Restor Neurol Neurosci2015; 33(3): 309–319.
69.
SchaechterJDFrickerZPPerdueKLet al. Microstructural status of ipsilesional and contralesional corticospinal tract correlates with motor skill in chronic stroke patients. Hum Brain Mapp2009; 30(11): 3461–3474.
70.
MaedaFKeenanJPTormosJMet al. Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability. Exp Brain Res2000; 133(4): 425–430.
71.
MuellbacherWZiemannUBoroojerdiBet al. Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior. Clin Neurophysiol2000; 111(6): 1002–1007.
72.
HaraY.Brain plasticity and rehabilitation in stroke patients. J Nippon Med Sch/Nippon Ika Daigaku Zasshi2015; 82: 4–13.
73.
BestmannSBaudewigJSiebnerHRet al. Subthreshold high-frequency TMS of human primary motor cortex modulates interconnected frontal motor areas as detected by interleaved fMRI-TMS. Neuroimage2003; 20(3): 1685–1696.
74.
DelvauxVAlagonaGGérardPet al. Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol2003; 114(7): 1217–1225.
75.
SalterKJutaiJHartleyMet al. Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. J Rehabil Med2006; 38(2): 113–117.
76.
WahlASOmlorWRubioJCet al. Neuronal repair. Asynchronous therapy restores motor control by rewiring of the rat corticospinal tract after stroke. Science2014; 344: 1250–1255.
77.
Von Carlowitz-GhoriKBayraktarogluZHohlefeldFUet al. Corticomuscular coherence in acute and chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol2014; 125: 1182–1191.
78.
MaedaFKeenanJPTormosJMet al. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol2000; 111(5): 800–805.
79.
QuartaroneABagnatoSRizzoVet al. Distinct changes in cortical and spinal excitability following high-frequency repetitive TMS to the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res2005; 161(1): 114–124.
80.
ToddGFlavelSCRiddingMC.Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation decreases motor cortical excitability in humans. J Appl Physiol2006; 101(2): 500–505.
81.
KandelMBeisJMLeCLet al. Non-invasive cerebral stimulation for the upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2012; 55(9–10): 657–680.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
