Discussing factors associated with quality of life in cancer follow-up appointments: a preliminary test of a pragmatic model for clinical practice

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study is to perform a preliminary test of a practical, evidence-based model to enable discussions around quality of life–related concerns during cancer follow-up appointments.

Design:

Cross-sectional study measuring quality of life, illness perceptions, emotional distress, fatigue, and subjective cognitive complaints.

Setting:

Cancer outpatient follow-up clinics in four National Health Services in the United Kingdom.

Participants:

Working-age post-treatment cancer patients, treated with curative intent.

Interventions:

Not applicable.

Main measures:

European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer – Quality of Life Questionnaire – Core 30, Illness Perceptions Questionnaire – Revised, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Chalder Fatigue Scale, and Cognitive Failures Questionnaire.

Results:

Fifty-seven cancer patients, with a mean age of 36 years and on average 2.75 years post treatment, returned the completed questionnaires. Anxiety partially mediated the association between subjective cognitive complaints and illness identity (60%) and timeline (25%). Cognitive complaints mediated the relationships between quality of life and anxiety (45%), depression (30%), and fatigue (62%). Depression mediated the relationships between quality of life and illness identity (48%) and timeline (40%).

Conclusion:

Our study provides a preliminary test of an evidence-based model to help elicit quality of life–related concerns during cancer follow-up appointments. Illness perceptions are associated with quality of life through the mediation of other cancer-relevant factors. Discussing the type, origin, and expected duration of symptoms may elicit other concerns, such as emotional distress, fatigue, or cognitive complaints, which explained a significant amount of the relationship between illness perceptions and quality of life.

Keywords

Quality of life follow-up care illness perceptions cancer survivors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Office of National Statistics. Cancer survival rates, cancer survival in England, patients diagnosed 2005–2009 and followed up to 2010, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160129224133/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/cancer-unit/cancer-survival-rates/2005-2009–followed-up-to-2010/stb-cancer-survival–2005-09-and-followed-up-to-2010.html (accessed 24 January 2018).

Maddams

Utley

Møller

Projections of cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom, 2010–2040. Brit J Cancer 2012; 107(7): 1195–1202.

Jacobs

Shulman

LN.

Follow-up care of cancer survivors: challenges and solutions. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18(1): e19–e29.

Heathcote

Goldberg

Eccleston

et al . Advancing shared decision making for symptom monitoring in people living beyond cancer. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19(10): e556–e563.

NHS Improvement. Innovation to implementation: stratified pathways of care for people living with and beyond cancer, https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/stratified-pathways-update.pdf (accessed 24 January 2018).

Howell

Hack

Oliver

et al . Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv 2012; 6(4): 359–371.

Thanarajasingam

Minasian

Baron

et al . Beyond maximum grade: modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies. Lancet Haematol 2018; 5(11): e563–e598.

Independent Cancer Taskforce. Achieving world-class cancer outcomes – a strategy for England – executive summary, https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/sites/default/files/achieving_world-class_cancer_outcomes_-_a_strategy_for_england_2015-2020.pdf (accessed 24 January 2018).

World Health Organization. WHOQOL measuring quality of life, http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf (accessed 24 January 2018).

10.

Mitchell

Chan

Bhatti

et al . Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12(2): 160–174.

11.

Brown

Kroenke

Cancer-related fatigue and its associations with depression and anxiety: a systematic review. Psychosomatics 2009; 50(5): 440–447.

12.

Hutchinson

Hosking

Kichenadasse

et al . Objective and subjective cognitive impairment following chemotherapy for cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2012; 38(7): 926–934.

13.

Kaptein

Schoones

Fischer

et al . Illness perceptions in women with breast cancer – a systematic literature review. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 2015; 7(3): 117–126.

14.

Velikova

Coens

Efficace

et al . Health-related quality of life in EORTC clinical trials – 30 years of progress from methodological developments to making a real impact on oncology practice. Eur J Cancer Suppl 2012; 10(1): 141–149.

15.

Watson

Rose

Neal

et al . Personalised cancer follow-up: risk stratification, needs assessment or both? Brit J Cancer 2012; 106(1): 1–5.

16.

Jarrett

Scott

Addington-Hall

et al . Informing future research priorities into the psychological and social problems faced by cancer survivors: a rapid review and synthesis of the literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2013; 17(5): 510–520.

17.

Greenhalgh

Long

Flynn

The use of patient reported outcomes measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory?

Soc Sci Med 2005; 60(4): 833–843

18.

Hagger

Koch

Chatzisarantis

NLD

et al . The common sense model of self-regulation: meta-analysis and test of a process model. Psychol Bull 2017; 143(11): 1117–1154.

19.

Fayers

Aaronson

Bjordal

EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual [Internet]. EORTC, 2001, http://www.eortc.be/qol/files/SCManualQLQ-C30.pdf (accessed 24 January 2018).

20.

Bjelland

Dahl

Haug

et al . The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52(2): 69–77.

21.

Taylor

Jason

Torres

Fatigue rating scales: an empirical comparison. Psychol Med 2000; 30(4): 849–856.

22.

Broadbent

Cooper

FitzGerald

et al . The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Brit J Clin Psychol 1982; 21: 1–16.

23.

Moss-Morris

Weinman

Petrie

et al . The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health 2002; 17(1): 1–16.

24.

Hayes

Rockwood

NJ.

Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behav Res Ther 2017; 98: 39–57.

25.

Baron

Kenny

DA.

The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 51(6): 1173–1182.

26.

Statistical Bulletin. Youth cohort study and longitudinal study of young people in England: the activities and experiences of 18 year olds: England 2010, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/youth-cohort-study-and-longitudinal-study-of-young-people-in-england-the-activities-and-experiences-of-19-year-olds-2010 (accessed 24 January 2018).

27.

O’Hara

Moran

Whelan

et al . Trends in survival for teenagers and young adults with cancer in the UK 1992–2006. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51(14): 2039–2048.

28.

Stark

Bowen

Dunwoodie

et al . Survival patterns in teenagers and young adults with cancer in the United Kingdom: comparisons with younger and older age groups. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51(17): 2643–2654.

29.

Garg

Boynton-Jarrett

Dworkin

PH.

Avoiding the unintended consequences of screening for social determinants of health. JAMA 2016; 316(8): 813.

30.

Jorm

Christensen

Korten

et al . Memory complaints as a precursor of memory impairment in older people: a longitudinal analysis over 7–8 years. Psychol Med 2001; 31(3): 441–449.

31.

Eysenck

Derakshan

Santos

et al . Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion 2007; 7(2): 336–353.

32.

Macmillan Cancer Support. Holistic needs assessment: care and support planning, http://be.macmillan.org.uk/Downloads/CancerInformation/ResourcesForHSCP/InformationResources/MAC16266HNAHowtoguide2016A4DIGITALAW.pdf (accessed 24 January 2018).

33.

Wagner

Glasgow

Davis

et al . Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. Joint Comm J Qual Im 2001; 27(2): 63–80.

34.

Wilkinson

Marmot

Social determinants of health: the solid facts. World Health Organ 2003; 2(2): 1–33.

35.

Taylor

Aslam

Lea

et al . Optimizing a retention strategy with young people for BRIGHTLIGHT, a longitudinal cohort study examining the value of specialist cancer care for young people. J Adolesc Young Adul 2017; 6(3): 459–469.

36.

Ashley

Marti

Jones

et al . Illness perceptions within 6 months of cancer diagnosis are an independent prospective predictor of health-related quality of life 15 months post-diagnosis. Psycho Oncology 2015; 24(11): 1463–1470.

37.

Trikkalinou

Papazafiropoulou

Melidonis

Type 2 diabetes and quality of life. World J Diabetes 2017; 8(4): 120–129.

38.

Dijkers

MPJM

. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42(3 suppl 1): 87–110.

39.

Palacios

Khondoker

Achilla

et al . A single, one-off measure of depression and anxiety predicts future symptoms, higher healthcare costs, and lower quality of life in coronary heart disease patients: analysis from a multi-wave, primary care cohort study. PLoS ONE 2016; 11(7): e0158163.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.32 MB