Effect of myofascial techniques for treatment of persistent arm pain after breast cancer treatment: randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the effect of myofascial therapy in addition to a standard physical therapy program for treatment of persistent arm pain after finishing breast cancer treatment.

Design:

Double-blinded (patient and assessor) randomized controlled trial.

Setting:

University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.

Patients:

A total of 50 patients with persistent arm pain and myofascial dysfunctions after breast cancer treatment.

Intervention:

Over three months, all patients received a standard physical therapy program. The intervention group received in addition 12 sessions of myofascial therapy, and the control group received 12 sessions of placebo therapy.

Main measurements:

Main outcome parameters were pain intensity (primary outcome) (maximum visual analogue scale (VAS) (0–100)), prevalence rate of arm pain, pressure hypersensitivity (pressure pain thresholds (kg/cm²) and pain quality (McGill Pain Questionnaire). Measures were taken before and after the intervention and at long term (6 and 12 months follow-up).

Results:

Patients in the intervention group had a significantly greater decrease in pain intensity compared to the control group (VAS −44/100 vs. −24/100, P = 0.046) with a mean difference in change after three months between groups of 20/100 (95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 39.7). After the intervention, 44% versus 64% of patients still experienced pain in the intervention and control group, respectively (P = 0.246). No significant differences were found for the other outcomes.

Conclusion:

Myofascial therapy is an effective physical therapy modality to decrease pain intensity at the arm in breast cancer survivors at three months, but no other benefits at that time were found. There were no long-term effects at 12 months either.

Keywords

Breast neoplasms physical therapy modalities pain myofascial pain syndromes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

De Groef

Van Kampen

Dieltjens

et al . Effectiveness of postoperative physical therapy for upper-limb impairments after breast cancer treatment: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96(6): 1140–1153.

Stubblefield

Keole

Upper body pain and functional disorders in patients with breast cancer. PM R 2013; 6(2): 170–183.

Fernández-Lao

Cantarero-Villanueva

Fernández-de-Las-Peñas

et al . Development of active myofascial trigger points in neck and shoulder musculature is similar after lumpectomy or mastectomy surgery for breast cancer. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2012; 16(2): 183–190.

Fourie

WJ.

Considering wider myofascial involvement as a possible contributor to upper extremity dysfunction following treatment for primary breast cancer. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008; 12(4): 349–355.

Torres Lacomba

Mayoral del Moral

Coperias Zazo

et al . Incidence of myofascial pain syndrome in breast cancer surgery: a prospective study. Clin J Pain 2010; 26(4): 320–325.

Cheville

Tchou

Barriers to rehabilitation following surgery for primary breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2007; 95(5): 409–418.

Bron

de Gast

Dommerholt

et al . Treatment of myofascial trigger points in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Med 2011; 9: 8.

Hains

Descarreaux

Hains

Chronic shoulder pain of myofascial origin: a randomized clinical trial using ischemic compression therapy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010; 33(5): 362–369.

Ajimsha

Chithra

Thulasyammal

RP.

Effectiveness of myofascial release in the management of lateral epicondylitis in computer professionals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93(4): 604–609.

10.

Cástro-Sanchez

Matarán-Peñarrocha

Arroyo-Morales

et al . Effects of myofascial release techniques on pain, physical function, and postural stability in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25(9): 800–813.

11.

Grieve

Clark

Pearson

et al . The immediate effect of soleus trigger point pressure release on restricted ankle joint dorsiflexion: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2011; 15(1): 42–49.

12.

Fernández-Lao

Cantarero-Villanueva

Fernández-de-Las-Peñas

et al . Effectiveness of a multidimensional physical therapy program on pain, pressure hypersensitivity, and trigger points in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin J Pain 2012; 28(2): 113–121.

13.

De Groef

Van Kampen

Vervloesem

et al . An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): development and interrater reliability. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(6): e0179116.

14.

De Groef

Van Kampen

Vervloesem

et al . Inter-rater reliability of shoulder measurements in middle-aged women. Physiotherapy 2017; 103(2): 222–230.

15.

Melzack

The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1(3): 277–299.

16.

Angst

Schwyzer

Aeschlimann

et al . Measures of adult shoulder function: disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63(suppl. 11): S174–S188.

17.

Treanor

Donnelly

A methodological review of the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) and its derivatives among breast cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 2015; 24(2): 339–362.

18.

Dieltjens

The effect of myofascial techniques on shoulder pain, shoulder function and quality of life after breast cancer treatment. Osteopathy thesis. Flanders International College of Osteopathy, Belgium, 2011.

19.

Tashjian

Deloach

Porucznik

et al . Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18(6): 927–932.

20.

Busse

Bartlett

Dougados

et al . Optimal strategies for reporting pain in clinical trials and systematic reviews: recommendations from an OMERACT 12 workshop. J Rheumatol 2015; 42(10): 1962–1970.

21.

Kelly

The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 2001; 18(3): 205–207.

22.

Fernández-Lao

Cantarero-Villanueva

Fernández-de-Las-Peñas

et al . Myofascial trigger points in neck and shoulder muscles and widespread pressure pain hypersensitivity in patients with postmastectomy pain: evidence of peripheral and central sensitization. Clin J Pain 2010; 26(9): 798–806.

23.

Andersen

Jensen

Tvedskov

et al . Persistent pain, sensory disturbances and functional impairment after immediate or delayed axillary lymph node dissection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39(1): 31–35.

24.

Bokhari

Sawatzky

JA.

Chronic neuropathic pain in women after breast cancer treatment. Pain Manag Nurs 2009; 10(4): 197–205.

25.

Geber

Breimhorst

Burbach

et al . Pain in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy—more than neuropathic? Pain 2013; 154(12): 2877–2887.

26.

Fernández-Lao

Cantarero-Villanueva

Fernández-de-las-Peñas

et al . Widespread mechanical pain hypersensitivity as a sign of central sensitization after breast cancer surgery: comparison between mastectomy and lumpectomy. Pain Med 2011; 12(1): 72–78.

27.

Kudel

Edwards

Kozachik

et al . Predictors and consequences of multiple persistent postmastectomy pains. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 34(6): 619–627.

28.

Nesvold

Reinertsen

Fossa

et al . The relation between arm/shoulder problems and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Cancer Surviv 2011; 5(1): 62–72.

29.

Mols

Vingerhoets

Coebergh

et al . Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41(17): 2613–2619.

30.

Bialosky

Bishop

Penza

CW.

Placebo mechanisms of manual therapy: a sheep in wolf’s clothing?

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47(5): 301–304.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.56 MB