Myofascial techniques have no additional beneficial effects to a standard physical therapy programme for upper limb pain after breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the effects of myofascial techniques, in addition to a standard physical therapy programme for upper limb pain shortly after breast cancer surgery.

Design:

Double-blinded (patient and assessor) randomized controlled trial with two groups.

Setting:

University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium

Patients:

A total of 147 patients with unilateral axillary clearance for breast cancer.

Intervention:

All participants received a standard physical therapy programme starting immediately after surgery for four months. The intervention group received additionally eight sessions of myofascial therapy from two up to four months after surgery. The control group received eight sessions of a placebo intervention, including static hand placements at the upper body region.

Main measurements:

The primary outcome was prevalence rate of upper limb pain. Additionally, pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0–100)), pressure hypersensitivity (pressure pain thresholds (PPTs; kg/cm²)) and pain quality (McGill Pain Questionnaire) were evaluated. All measurements were performed at 2 (=baseline), 4, 9 and 12 months post-surgery.

Results:

At 4, 9 and 12 months post-surgery, prevalence rates of pain, pain intensity and pain quality were comparable between the intervention and control group. PPT of the upper trapezius muscle was significantly higher in the intervention group at four months with a difference of −1.2 (−1.9 to −0.4) kg/cm², P = 0.012). PPT of the supraspinatus muscle was significantly higher in the intervention group at four months (−0.7 (−1.4 to −0.1) kg/cm², P = 0.021) and at nine months (−0.5 (−1.1 to 0.0), P = 0.040).

Conclusion:

Myofascial therapy has no added beneficial effect as standard physical therapy modality in the postoperative stage.

Keywords

Breast neoplasms physical therapy modalities pain myofascial pain syndromes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hidding

Beurskens

Van der Wees

et al . Treatment related impairments in arm and shoulder in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. PloS ONE 2014; 9(5): e96748.

Swenson

Nissen

Ceronsky

et al . Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9(8): 745–753.

Rietman

Dijkstra

Hoekstra

et al . Late morbidity after treatment of breast cancer in relation to daily activities and quality of life: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29(3): 229–238.

Nesvold

Dahl

Lokkevik

et al . Arm and shoulder morbidity in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy. Acta Oncol 2008; 47(5): 835–842.

Avis

Crawford

Manuel

. Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(15): 3322–3330.

Mols

Vingerhoets

Coebergh

et al . Quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41(17): 2613–2619.

Stubblefield

Keole

. Upper body pain and functional disorders in patients with breast cancer. PM R 2013; 6(2): 170–183.

De Groef

Van Kampen

Dieltjens

et al . Effectiveness of postoperative physical therapy for upper-limb impairments after breast cancer treatment: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96(6): 1140–1153.

Cheville

Tchou

. Barriers to rehabilitation following surgery for primary breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2007; 95(5): 409–418.

10.

Torres Lacomba

Mayoral del Moral

Coperias Zazo

et al . Incidence of myofascial pain syndrome in breast cancer surgery: a prospective study. Clin J Pain 2010; 26(4): 320–325.

11.

Fernandez-Lao

Cantarero-Villanueva

Fernandez-de-Las-Penas

et al . Myofascial trigger points in neck and shoulder muscles and widespread pressure pain hypersensitivtiy in patients with postmastectomy pain: evidence of peripheral and central sensitization. Clin J Pain 2010; 26(9): 798–806.

12.

Fourie

. Considering wider myofascial involvement as a possible contributor to upper extremity dysfunction following treatment for primary breast cancer. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008; 12(4): 349–355.

13.

Fernandez-Lao

Cantarero-Villanueva

Fernandez-de-Las-Penas

et al . Development of active myofascial trigger points in neck and shoulder musculature is similar after lumpectomy or mastectomy surgery for breast cancer. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2012; 16(2): 183–190.

14.

De Groef

Van Kampen

Vervloesem

et al . Effect of myofascial techniques for treatment of persistent upper limb pain after breast cancer treatment: randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer, in press.

15.

De Groef

Van Kampen

Verlvoesem

et al . Effect of myofascial techniques for treatment of upper limb dysfunctions in breast cancer survivors: randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2017; 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3616-9

16.

Fischer

. Pressure algometry over normal muscles: standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain 1987; 30(1): 115–126.

17.

Melzack

. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1(3): 277–299.

18.

Angst

Schwyzer

Aeschlimann

et al . Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ): and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63 (Suppl. 11): S174–S188.

19.

Treanor

Donnelly

. A methodological review of the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) and its derivatives among breast cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 2015; 24(2): 339–362.

20.

Devoogdt

Christiaens

Geraerts

et al . Effect of manual lymph drainage in addition to guidelines and exercise therapy on arm lymphoedema related to breast cancer: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2011; 343: d5326.

21.

Caro-Moran

Fernandez-Lao

Diaz-Rodriguez

et al . Pressure pain sensitivity maps of the neck-shoulder region in breast cancer survivors. Pain Med 2016; 17: 1942–1952.

22.

Wytrążek

Huber

Lipiec

et al . Evaluation of palpation, pressure algometry, and electromyography for monitoring trigger points in young participants. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2015; 38(3): 232–243.

23.

Nijs

Leysen

Adriaenssens

et al . Pain following cancer treatment: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive and central sensitization pain. Acta Oncol 2016; 55(6): 659–663.

24.

Bergmann

Mendes

De Almeida Dias

et al . Incidence and risk factors for axillary web syndrome after breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 131(3): 987–992.

25.

Andersen

Duriaud

Aasvang

et al . Association between sensory dysfunction and pain 1 week after breast cancer surgery: a psychophysical study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60(2): 259–269.

26.

Rietman

Dijkstra

Debreczeni

et al . Impairments, disabilities and health related quality of life after treatment for breast cancer: a follow-up study 2.7 years after surgery. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26(2): 78–84.

27.

Nesvold

Reinertsen

Fossa

et al . The relation between arm/shoulder problems and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Cancer Surviv 2011; 5(1): 62–72.

28.

Busse

Bartlett

Dougados

et al . Optimal strategies for reporting pain in clinical trials and systematic reviews: recommendations from an OMERACT 12 workshop. J Rheumatol 2015; 42: 1962–1970.

29.

Harrington

Gilchrist

Sander

. Clinical measures of pain. Rehabil Oncol 2014; 32(1): 13–21.

30.

Smoot

Paul

Aouizerat

et al . Predictors of altered upper extremity function during the first year after breast cancer treatment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 95: 639–655.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.28 MB