Self-efficacy and pain acceptance as mediators of the relationship between pain and performance of valued life activities in women and men with rheumatoid arthritis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2017
Self-efficacy and pain acceptance as mediators of the relationship between pain and performance of valued life activities in women and men with rheumatoid arthritis
To study whether personal factors (self-efficacy and pain acceptance) mediate the relationship between pain and performance of valued life activities in persons with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods:
Persons with rheumatoid arthritis for at least four years (n = 737; 73% women) answered a questionnaire measuring self-efficacy, pain acceptance, performance of valued life activities, and self-rated pain. Relationships among these constructs were explored using univariate and multivariate analyses. Structural equation modelling was then used to examine the mediational role of personal factors on the relationship between pain and performance of valued life activities.
Results:
A direct negative association between pain and performance of valued life activities was identified (Beta = .34, P < .001). This suggests that people with rheumatoid arthritis who had higher levels of pain has increased difficulties in performing valued life activities. Self-efficacy and activity engagement component of pain acceptance mediated the relationship between pain and performance of valued life activities, however the pain willingness component of pain acceptance did not influence participation in valued life activities.
Conclusion:
These findings highlight the importance of considering personal factors, such as pain acceptance and self-efficacy, in facilitating participation in valued life activities.
AhlstrandIBjörkMThybergIFalkmerT. Pain and difficulties performing valued life activities in women and men with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Rheumatol2015: 1–10.
2.
GyurcsikNCBrawleyLRSpinkKSGlazebrookKEAndersonTJ. Is Level of Pain Acceptance Differentially Related to Social Cognitions and Behavior? The Case of Active Women with Arthritis. J. Health Psychol2011; 16: 530–539.
3.
AhlstrandIBjörkMThybergIBörsboBFalkmerT. Pain and daily activities in rheumatoid arthritis. Disabil. Rehabil2012; 34: 1245–1253.
4.
BjörkMGerdleBThybergIPeolssonM. Multivariate relationships between pain intensity and other aspects of health in rheumatoid arthritis–cross sectional and five year longitudinal analyses (the Swedish TIRA project). Disabil. Rehabil2008; 30: 1429–1438.
5.
World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
6.
StammTACiezaAMacholdKSmolenJSStuckiG. Exploration of the link between conceptual occupational therapy models and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Aust. Occup. Ther. J2006; 53: 9–17.
7.
CiezaAStuckiG. Understanding functioning, disability, and health in rheumatoid arthritis: the basis for rehabilitation care. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol2005; 17: 183–189.
8.
MeestersJHagelSKlokkerudM, et al. Goal-setting in multidisciplinary team care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an international multi-center evaluation of the contents using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med2013; 45: 888–899.
9.
GeyhSPeterCMüllerR, et al. The Personal Factors of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the literature – a systematic review and content analysis. Disabil. Rehabil2011; 33: 1089–1102.
10.
GrotkampSLCibisWMNüchternEAMvon MittelstaedtGSegerWKF. Personal Factors in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Prospective Evidence. AJRC2012; 18: 1–24.
11.
LefebvreJKeefeFAffleckG, et al. The relationship of arthritis self-efficacy to daily pain, daily mood, and daily pain coping in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Pain1999; 80: 425–435.
12.
KeefeFRumbleMScipioCGiordanoLPerriL. Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science. J. Pain2004; 5: 195–211.
13.
SomersTJShelbyRAKeefeFJ, et al. Disease severity and domain-specific arthritis self-efficacy: relationships to pain and functioning in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis. Care. Res2010; 62: 848–856.
14.
McCrackenLMVowlesKE. Acceptance of chronic pain. Curr. Pain Headache2006; 10: 90–94.
15.
VianeICrombezGEcclestonCDevulderJDe CorteW. Acceptance of the unpleasant reality of chronic pain: effects upon attention to pain and engagement with daily activities. Pain2004; 112: 282–288.
16.
LachapelleDLLavoieSBoudreauA. The meaning and process of pain acceptance. Perceptions of women living with arthritis and fibromyalgia. Pain Res. Manag2008; 13: 201–210.
17.
Pinto-GouveiaJCostaJMarôcoJ. The first 2-years of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The influence of Acceptance on Pain, Physical Limitation and Depression. J. Health Psychol2015; 20(1):102–112.
18.
ArnettFCEdworthySMBlochDA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 Revised Criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis. Rheum1988; 31: 315–324.
19.
PrevooMLLVan’T HofMAKuperHHVan LeeuwenMAVan De PutteLBAVan RielPLCM. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis. Rheum1995; 38: 44–48.
20.
EkdahlCEberhardtKAnderssonSISvenssonB. Assessing Disability in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Scand. J. Rheumatol1988; 17: 263–271.
21.
ThybergIDahlströmÖBjörkMArvidssonPThybergM. Potential of the HAQ score as clinical indicator suggesting comprehensive multidisciplinary assessments: the Swedish TIRA cohort 8 years after diagnosis of RA. Clin. Rheumatol2012; 31: 775–783.
22.
KatzPPMorrisAYelinEH. Prevalence and predictors of disability in valued life activities among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis2006; 65: 763–769.
23.
BjörkMThybergMValterssonEKatzP. Validation and internal consistency of the Swedish version of the Valued Life Activities scale. Clin. Rehabil2016; 30(12): 1211–1219.
24.
LorigKChastainRLUngEShoorSHolmanHR. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum1989; 32(1): 37–44.
25.
LomiCNordholmLA. Validation of a Swedish Version of the Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale. Scand. J. Rheumatol1992; 21: 231–237.
26.
LomiCBurckhardtCNordholmLBjelleAEkdahlC. Evaluation of a Swedish Version of the Arthritis Setf-Efficacy Scale in People with Fibromyalgia. Scand. J. Rheumatol1995; 24(5): 282–287.
27.
WicksellRKOlssonGLMelinL. The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)-further validation including a confirmatory factor analysis and a comparison with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Eur. J. Pain2009; 13: 760–768.
28.
McCrackenLMCarsonJWEcclestonCKeefeFJ. Acceptance and change in the context of chronic pain. Pain2004; 109: 4–7.
29.
RovnerGSArestedtKGerdleBBorsboBMcCrackenLM. Psychometric properties of the 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) in a Swedish chronic pain cohort. J Rehabil Med2014; 46: 73–80.
30.
FeinsteinABFormanEMMasudaA, et al. Pain intensity, psychological inflexibility, and acceptance of pain as predictors of functioning in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a preliminary investigation. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings2011; 18: 291–298.
31.
HayesAF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Commun. Monogr2009; 76: 408–420.
32.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenMR. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. EJBRM2008; 6: 53–60.
33.
McCrackenLM. Toward understanding acceptance and psychological flexibility in chronic pain. Pain2010; 149: 420–421.
34.
StofferMASmolenJSWoolfA, et al. Development of patient-centred standards of care for rheumatoid arthritis in Europe: the eumusc.net project. Ann. Rheum. Dis2014; 73: 902–905.
35.
KlokkerudMDagfinrudHUhligT, et al. OP0229-HPR Developing a national core set of outcome measures for reabilitation in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Ann Rheum Dis2015; 74(Suppl 2): 158–159.
