Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

To establish the psychometric properties of a simple ‘low-tech’ choice stepping reaction time test (CSRT-M) by investigating its validity and test–retest reliability.

Design:

Cross-sectional.

Setting:

Community.

Subjects:

A total of 169 older people from the control arm of a clinical trial and a convenience sample of 30 older people.

Main measures:

Demographic, physical, cognitive and prospective falls data were collected in addition to CSRT-M. The CSRT-M time was taken as the total time to complete 20 steps onto four targets printed on a portable rubber mat. Assessment of the original electronic version (CSRT-E) and re-administration of the CSRT-M the next day was done in 30 participants.

Results:

Multivariate regression analysis showed that the CSRT-M time was best explained by leaning balance control, quadriceps strength and cognitive functioning (R² = 0.44). Performance on the CSRT-M was worse in older participants and participants with a presence of fall risk factors, supporting good discriminant validity. The odds of suffering multiple future falls increased by 74% (odds ratio (OR) = 1.74, 95% CI (confidence interval) = 1.14–2.65, p = 0.010) for each standard deviation increase in CSRT-M, supporting good predictive validity. Criterion validity was confirmed by a strong bivariate correlation between CSRT-M and CSRT-E (0.81, p < 0.001). Test–retest reliability for the CSRT-M was good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.45–0.88, p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

A simple test of unplanned volitional stepping (CSRT-M) has excellent predictive validity for future falls, good inter-day test–retest reliability and excellent criterion validity with respect to the well-validated CSRT-E. The CSRT-M, therefore, may be a useful fall risk screening tool for older people.

Keywords

Choice stepping reaction time accidental falls aged portable test assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Todd

Skelton

. What are the main risk factors for falls among older people and what are the most effective interventions to prevent these falls? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2004.

Lord

Fitzpatrick

. Choice stepping reaction time: A composite measure of falls risk in older people. J Gerontol A, Biologic Sci Med Sci 2001; 56(10): M627–632.

Winter

. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 1995; 3(4): 193–214.

Henwood

Taaffe

. Improved physical performance in older adults undertaking a short-term programme of high-velocity resistance training. Gerontology 2005; 51(2): 108–115.

Whitney

Marchetti

Morris

Sparto

. The reliability and validity of the Four Square Step Test for people with balance deficits secondary to a vestibular disorder. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88(1): 99–104.

Blennerhassett

Jayalath

. The Four Square Step Test is a feasible and valid clinical test of dynamic standing balance for use in ambulant people poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89(11): 2156–2161.

Tiedemann

Lord

Sherrington

. The development and validation of a brief performance-based fall risk assessment tool for use in primary care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2010; 65(8): 893–900.

Chung

Chan

Fung

. Reliability and validity of Alternate Step Test times in subjects with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med 2014; 46(10): 969–974.

Hill

. A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: Reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly. Physiother Can 1996; 48(4): 257–262.

10.

Fujisawa

Takeda

. A new clinical test of dynamic standing balance in the frontal plane: The side-step test. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20(4): 340–346.

11.

Medell

Alexander

. A clinical measure of maximal and rapid stepping in older women. J Gerontol A, Biologic Sci Med Sci 2000; 55(8): M429–433.

12.

Sturnieks

St George

Lord

. Balance disorders in the elderly. Neurophysiol Clin 2008; 38(6): 467–478.

13.

St George

Fitzpatrick

Rogers

Lord

. Choice stepping response and transfer times: Effects of age, fall risk, and secondary tasks. J Gerontol A, Biologic Sci Med Sci 2007; 62(5): 537–542.

14.

Pijnappels

Delbaere

Sturnieks

Lord

. The association between choice stepping reaction time and falls in older adults—a path analysis model. Age Ageing 2010; 39(1): 99–104.

15.

Sherrington

Lord

Vogler

. A post-hospital home exercise program improved mobility but increased falls in older people: A randomised controlled trial. PloS one 2014; 9(9): e104412.

16.

Folstein

McHugh

. “Mini-Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12(3): 189–198.

17.

Delbaere

Heim

. A multifactorial approach to understanding fall risk in older people. J Am Geriatric Soc 2010; 58(9): 1679–1685.

18.

Sturnieks

St George

Fitzpatrick

Lord

. Effects of spatial and nonspatial memory tasks on choice stepping reaction time in older people. J Gerontol A, Biologic Sci Med Sci 2008; 63(10): 1063–1068.

19.

Lord

Ward

Williams

. Exercise effect on dynamic stability in older women: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77(3): 232–236.

20.

Lord

Menz

Tiedemann

. A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Phys Ther 2003; 83(3): 237–252.

21.

Kempen

Yardley

van Haastregt

. The Short FES-I: A shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age Ageing 2008; 37(1): 45–50.

22.

Nevitt

Cummings

Kidd

Black

. Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls. A prospective study. JAMA 1989; 261(18): 2663–2668.

23.

Bland

Altman

. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1(8476): 307–310.

24.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33(1): 159–174.

25.

Kvelde

Pijnappels

Delbaere

Lord

. Physiological and cognitive mediators for the association between self-reported depressed mood and impaired choice stepping reaction time in older people. J Gerontol A, Biologic Sci Med Sci 2010; 65(5): 538–544.

26.

Waddell

Mellifont

Burkett

. Improving balance in community-dwelling older people through a targeted mediolateral postural stability program. J Am Geriatric Soc 2009; 57(12): 2380–2382.

27.

Brauer

Woollacott

Shumway-Cook

. The influence of a concurrent cognitive task on the compensatory stepping response to a perturbation in balance-impaired and healthy elders. Gait Posture 2002; 15(1): 83–93.

28.

Klingner

Tversky

Hanrahan

. Effects of visual and verbal presentation on cognitive load in vigilance, memory, and arithmetic tasks. Psychophysiology 2011; 48(3): 323–332.

29.

Hoang

Cameron

Gandevia

Lord

. Neuropsychological, balance, and mobility risk factors for falls in people with multiple sclerosis: A prospective cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95(3): 480–486.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB

Validity and reliability of a simple ‘low-tech’ test for measuring choice stepping reaction time in older people

Abstract

Objective:

Design:

Setting:

Subjects:

Main measures:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material