What is the comparative effectiveness of current standard treatment,against an individually tailored behavioural programme delivered either on the Internet or face-to-face for people with acute whiplash associated disorder? A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the comparative effectiveness of current standard treatment, against an individually tailored behavioural programme delivered via the Internet or face-to-face for people with acute whiplash associated disorders.

Design:

A multicentre, randomized, three-group design, with concealed allocation.

Subjects and settings:

A total of 55 participants (37 female), age 18–65, with acute Whiplash Associated Disorder (Grade I–II), recruited at two emergency clinics in Sweden.

Interventions:

Before randomization all participants received standard self-care instructions. The Internet and face-to-face groups followed a seven-week behavioural programme involving individual tailoring, via email (Internet group), or in sessions at a physical therapy unit (face-to-face group). The control group only received the self-care instructions.

Main measures:

Pain-related disability, pain intensity, self-efficacy in daily activities, catastrophizing and fear of movement/(re)injury. Assessments were performed at baseline (2–4 weeks postinjury) and at three, six and 12 months postintervention.

Results:

Both the Internet (n = 16) and face-to-face (n = 14) group showed a larger decrease in pain-related disability than the control group (n = 16); −12 and −11, respectively, compared with −5 in the control group at 12-months follow-up. Significant differences between the groups in overall treatment effect were shown in all outcomes except pain intensity. All groups improved significantly over time in all outcomes, except for fear of movement/(re)injury and catastrophizing in the control group.

Conclusion:

An individually tailored behavioural programme improved biopsychosocial factors in patients with whiplash associated disorders up to 12 months after treatment. Internet-delivered intervention was as effective as clinic-based face-to-face therapy sessions.

Keywords

Acute whiplash avoidance of activities behaviour physical therapy disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Holm

Carroll

Cassidy

. The burden and determinants of neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders after traffic collisions: Results of the Bone And Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009; 32(2): S61–69.

Carroll

Holm

Hogg-Johnson

. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008; 33: S83–92.

Jull

Soderlund

Stemper

. Toward optimal early management after whiplash injury to lessen the rate of transition to chronicity: Discussion paper 5. Spine 2011; 36: S335–342.

Kamper

Rebbeck

Maher

. Course and prognostic factors of whiplash: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2008; 138: 617–629.

Soderlund

Olerud

Lindberg

. Acute whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): The effects of early mobilization and prognostic factors in long-term symptomatology. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 457–467.

Lorig

Ritter

Dost

. The Expert Patients Programme online, a 1-year study of an Internet-based self-management programme for people with long-term conditions. Chronic illness 2008; 24: 247–256.

Buhrman

Faltenhag

Strom

. Controlled trial of Internet-based treatment with telephone support for chronic back pain. Pain 2004; 111: 368–377.

Andersson

. Using the Internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2009; 47: 175–180.

Spitzer

Skovron

Salmi

. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine 1995; 20: 1S–73S.

10.

Schulz

Altman

Moher

. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2011; 9: 672–677.

11.

Baldwin

. Behavior principles in everyday life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001, pp.11–83.

12.

Turk

Okifuji

. Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 678–690.

13.

Bandura

. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 2004; 31: 143–164.

14.

Soderlund

Bring

Asenlof

. A three-group study, internet-based, face-to-face based and standard- management after acute whiplash associated disorders (WAD) – choosing the most efficient and cost-effective treatment: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10: 90.

15.

Pollard

. Preliminary validity study of the pain disability index. Percept Motor Skills 1984; 59: 974.

16.

Jensen

Karoly

. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In: Turk

Melzack

(eds) Hand-book of pain assessment. New York and London: Guilford, 1992, pp.135–151.

17.

Altmaier

Russell

Feng Kao

. Role of self-efficacy in rehabilitation outcome among chronic low back pain patients. J Counsel Psychol 1993; 40: 335–339.

18.

Denison

Asenlof

Lindberg

. Self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and pain intensity as predictors of disability in subacute and chronic musculoskeletal pain patients in primary health care. Pain 2004; 111: 245–252.

19.

Vlaeyen

Kole-Snijders

Boeren

. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995; 62: 363–372.

20.

Rosenstiel

Keefe

. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 1983; 17: 33–44.

21.

The R Project for Statistical Computing. MATHEMATICS IFSA. The R Foundation. http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed August 2014).

22.

Armitage

Colton

. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. Chester: Wiley, 1998, pp.3689–3690.

23.

Teasell

McClure

Walton

. A research synthesis of therapeutic interventions for whiplash-associated disorder (WAD): Part 2 – interventions for acute WAD. Pain Res Manag 2010; 15: 295–304.

24.

Eccleston

Crombez

. Worry and chronic pain: a misdirected problem solving model. Pain 2007; 132: 233–236.

25.

Kall

. Psychological determinants of quality of life in patients with whiplash associated disorders-a prospective study. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 227–236.

26.

Soderlund

Asenlof

. The mediating role of self-efficacy expectations and fear of movement and (re)injury beliefs in two samples of acute pain. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32: 2118–2126.

27.

Bandura

. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191–215.

28.

Cote

Hogg-Johnson

Cassidy

. Early aggressive care and delayed recovery from whiplash: Isolated finding or reproducible result? Arthrit Rheum 2007; 57: 861–868.

29.

Pape

Hagen

Brox

Natvig

Schirmer

. Early multidisciplinary evaluation and advice was ineffective for whiplash-associated disorders. Eur J Pain 2009; 13: 1068–1075.

30.

Asenlof

Denison

Lindberg

. Individually tailored treatment targeting activity, motor behavior, and cognition reduces pain-related disability: A randomized controlled trial in patients with musculoskeletal pain. J Pain 2005; 6: 588–603.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB