Psychometric comparisons of four disease-specific health-related quality of life measures for stroke survivors

Abstract

Objective:

To examine psychometric properties of four stroke-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures, including original Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (12-domain SSQoL), modified 8-domain SSQoL, Stroke Impact Scale (SIS 3.0), and modified SIS-16 focused on physical domains.

Design and Setting:

Prospective repeated measures study conducted in rehabilitation and wards in hospitals.

Subjects:

Study cohort was recruited with 263 patients in the first administration and 121 in the second administration, an average of two weeks later. To investigate discriminant validity, the same number of patients (i.e., 52) was grouped for each of 3 levels of stroke severity.

Main measures:

Outcome measures, including National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Barthel Index. Patients completed HRQoL self-reports.

Results:

Domains of four measures showed (1) good reliability, except 12-domainSSQoL family roles (Cronbach’s α = 0.68) and personality domains (Cronbach’s α = 0.65) and SIS 3.0 social participation (ICC=0.67) domain; (2) acceptable precision, except 12-domain SSQoL family role domain and SIS 3.0 social participation domain; (3) good convergent validity, except 12-domain SSQoL/8-domain SSQoL vision domain (r = 0.19), (4) good discriminant validity, except 12-domain SSQoL and 8-domain SSQoL thinking domains (P = 0.365); and (5) acceptable floor effects and strong ceiling effects. The 12-domain SSQoL and 8-domain SSQoL met scaling assumptions better than SIS 3.0 and SIS-16.

Conclusions:

Four measures showed acceptable psychometric properties with some domains slightly less satisfactory. Overall, use of 8-domain SSQoL and SIS 3.0 are feasible for clinical practice to monitor HRQoL of stroke survivors.

Keywords

Quality of life stroke outcome measures psychometric properties disease-specific measures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Williams

Weinberger

Harris

Clark

Biller

. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999; 30:1362–1369.

Duncan

Wallace

Lai

Johnson

Embretson

Laster

. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999; 30: 2131–2140.

Ewert

Stucki

. Validity of the SS-QOL in Germany and in survivors of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21:161–168.

Duncan

Bode

Lai

Perera

. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 950–963.

Carod-Artal

Coral

Trizotto

Moreira

. The stroke impact scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version. Stroke 2008; 39: 2477–2484.

Duncan

Lai

Bode

Perera

DeRosa

. Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function. Neurology 2003; 60: 291–296.

Hsueh

Jeng

Lee

Sheu

Hsieh

. Construct Validity of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire in Ischemic Stroke Patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1113–1118.

Lin

Hsieh

Chen

Lee

. Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 435–443.

WHOQoL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQoL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 551–558.

10.

Yao

Chung

Wang

. Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. J Formos Med Assoc 2002; 101: 342–351.

11.

Brott

Adams

Olinger

Marler

Barsan

Biller

Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864–870.

12.

Fischer

Baumgartner

Arnold

Nedeltchev

Gralla

De Marchis

What is a minor stroke?

Stroke 2010; 41:661–666.

13.

Chang

Tseng

. Costs of acute care of first-ever ischemic stroke in Taiwan. Stroke 2003; 34: e219–e221.

14.

Dewey

Donnan

Freeman

Sharples

Macdonell

McNeil

Interrater reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: rating by neurologists and nurses in a community-based stroke incidence study. Cerebrovasc Dis 1999; 9: 323–327.

15.

Goldstein

Samsa

. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke 1997; 28: 307–310.

16.

Folstein

McHugh

. “Mini-mental state”, a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–198.

17.

Mahoney

Barthel

. Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61–65.

18.

Carod-Artal

Trizotto

Coral

Moreira

. Determinants of quality of life in Brazilian stroke survivors. J Neurol Sci 2009; 15: 63–68.

19.

Hsueh

Lee

Hsieh

. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc 2001; 100: 526–532.

20.

Hsueh

Lin

Jeng

Hsieh

. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 188–190.

21.

van der Linden

Kragt

Klein

van der Ploeg

Polman

Uitdehaag

. Psychometric evaluation of the multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) for proxy use. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 1677–1681.

22.

Parent

Hill

Moreau

Mahood

Raso

Lou

. Score distribution of the Scoliosis Quality of Life Index questionnaire in different subgroups of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007; 32: 1767–1777.

23.

Fayers

Machin

. Quality of life, the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd edn. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2007.

24.

Nunnally

Bernstein

. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc, 1994.

25.

Bland

Altman

. Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 1997; 314: 572.

26.

Lexell

Downham

. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 719–723.

27.

Beckerman

Roebroeck

Lankhorst

Becher

Bezemer

Verbeek

. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 571–578.

28.

Wyrwich

Nienaber

Tierney

Wolinsky

. Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 1999; 37: 469–478.

29.

Portney

Watkins

. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Health, 2000.

30.

Kerlinger

. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964.

31.

Edwards

O’Connell

. Internal consistency and validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0) and SIS-16 in an Australian sample. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 1127–1135.

32.

Lai

Perera

Duncan

Bode

. Physical and social functioning after stroke: comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36. Stroke 2003; 34: 488–493.

33.

Kerber

Brown

Skolarus

Morgenstern

Smith

Garcia

Validation of the 12-item stroke-specific quality of life scale in a biethnic stroke population. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: 1270–1272.

34.

Post

Boosman

van Zandvoort

Passier

Rinkel

Visser-Meily

. Development and validation of a short version of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82: 283–286.

35.

Wong

Lam

Ngai

Wong

Poon

Mok

. Development of a short form of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale for patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci 2013; 335: 204–209.