To investigate the short- and medium-term efficacy of counselling services provided remotely by telephone, video or internet, in managing mental health outcomes following spinal cord injury.
Data sources:
A search of electronic databases, critical reviews and published meta-analyses was conducted.
Review methods:
Seven independent studies (N = 272 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The majority of these studies utilized telephone-based counselling, with limited research examining psychological interventions delivered by videoconferencing (Nstudy = 1) or online (Nstudy = 1).
Results:
There is some evidence that telecounselling can significantly improve an individual’s management of common comorbidities following spinal cord injury, including pain and sleep difficulties (d = 0.45). Medium-term treatment effects were difficult to evaluate, with very few studies providing these data, although participants have reported gains in quality of life 12 months after treatment (d = 0.88). The main clinical advantages are time efficiency and consumer satisfaction.
Conclusion:
The results highlight the need for further evidence, particularly randomized controlled trials, to establish the benefits and clinical viability of telecounselling.
CamposB. Telepsychology and telecounselling: counselling conducted in a technology environment. Counsel Psychother Health2009; 5: 26–59.
2.
Bloemen-VrenckenJHde WitteLPPostMWM. Follow-up care for persons with spinal cord injury living in the community: a systematic review of interventions and their evaluations. Spinal Cord2005; 43: 462–475.
3.
DeJongGHoffmanJMeadeMA. Post-rehabilitation health care for individuals with SCI: extending health care in the community. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil2011; 17: 46–58.
4.
DorstynDSMathiasJLDensonLA. Psychosocial outcomes of telephone-based counselling for adults with an acquired physical disability: a meta-analysis. Rehabil Psychol2011; 56: 1–14.
5.
KrauseJSSaundersLLNewmanS. Posttraumatic stress disorder and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2010; 91: 1182–1187.
6.
Bloemen-VrenckenJHde WitteLPPostMWM. Follow-up care for persons with spinal cord injury living in the community: a systematic review of interventions and their evaluations. Spinal Cord2005; 43: 462–475.
7.
World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.
8.
HornblowAR. The evolution and effectiveness of telephone counselling services. Hosp Community Psychiatry1986; 37: 731–733.
9.
KairyDLehouxPVincentCVisintinM. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil2009; 31: 427–447.
10.
HershWRHelfandMWallaceJ. Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2001; 1: 5–12.
11.
RoganteMGrigioniMCordellaDGiacomozziC. Ten years of telerehabilitation: a literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation2010; 27: 287–304.
12.
SchwartzSMTraskPCShanmughamKTownsendCO. Conducting psychological research in medical settings: challenges, limitations and recommendations for effectiveness research. Prof Psychol Res Pract2004; 35: 500–508.
13.
KersteinPEllis-HillCMcPhersonKMHarringtonR. Beyond the RCT: understanding the relationship between interventions, individuals and outcome. Disabil Rehabil2010; 32: 1028–1034.
14.
RadloffLS. The CES-D Scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas1977; 1: 385–400.
15.
Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence, 2011. www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 (accessed 1 November 2012).
16.
SackettDLRosenbergWMGrayJAHaynesRBRichardsonWS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ1996; 312: 71–72.
17.
HigginsJPTGreenS (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed 1 November 2012)
18.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med2009; 6: e1000100.
19.
CohenJ. A power primer. Psychol Bull1991; 112: 155–159.
20.
MorrisSBDeShonRP. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychol Meth2002; 7: 105–125.
SharpeD. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clin Psychol Rev1997; 17: 881–901.
23.
*BalcazarFEKellyEHBeysCBBalfanx-VretizK. Using peer mentoring to support the rehabilitation of individuals with violently acquired spinal cord injuries. J Appl Rehabil Counsel2011; 42: 3–11.
24.
*DorstynDSMathiasJLDensonLARobertsonTM. Effectiveness of telephone counselling in managing psychological outcomes following spinal cord injury: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2012; 93: 2100–2108.
25.
*LjungbergIKrollTLibinAGordonS. Using peer mentoring for people with spinal cord injury to enhance self-efficacy beliefs and prevent medical complications. J Clin Nurs2011; 20: 351–358.
26.
*LuckeKTLuckeJFMartinezH. Evaluation of a professional and peer telephone intervention with spinal cord injured individuals following rehabilitation in South Texas. J Multicult Nurs Health2004; 10: 68–74.
27.
*MiglioriniCTongeBSinclairA. Developing and piloting ePACT: a flexible psychological treatment for depression in people living with chronic spinal cord injury. Behav Change2011; 28: 45–54.
28.
*PhillipsVLVesmarovichSHauberRWiggersEEgnerA. Telecounselling: reaching out to newly injured spinal cord patients. Public Health Rep2001; 116: 94–102.
29.
*SchulzRCzajaSJLustigAZdaniukBMartireLMPerdomoD. Improving the quality of life of caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury: a raandomised controlled trial. Rehabil Psychol2009; 51: 1–15.
30.
SheehanDVLecrubierYSheehanKH. The MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview: the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview. J Clin Psychiatry1998; 59 (suppl 20): 22–23.
31.
FirstMBSpitzerRLGibbonMWilliamsJBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, research version, non-patient edition (SCID-I/NP). New York: Biometrics Research New York State Institute, 2002.
32.
LovibondSHLovibondPF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, second edition. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia, 2001.
33.
MiglioriniCElfströmMLTongeBL. Translation and Australian validation of the spinal cord lesion related coping strategies and emotional well-being questionnaires. Spinal Cord2008; 46: 690–695.
34.
WhiteneckGGCharlifueSWGerhartKAOverholserJDRichardsonGN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1992; 73: 519–526.
35.
BurtonLSchulzRJacksonSHirschCZdaniukB. Transitions in spousal caregiving: experience from the caregiver health effects study. Gerontologist2000; 43: 230–241.
36.
BelleSHBurgioLBurnsR., for the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health (REACH) II Investigators. Enhancing the quality of life of dementia caregivers from different ethnic or racial groups. Ann Intern Med2006; 145: 727–738.
37.
HamiltonBBGrangerCBSherwinFSZeileznyMTashmanJS. Uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: FuhrerMJ (ed.) Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing, 1987, pp. 137–147.
38.
WinefieldHRWinefieldAHTiggemanM. Social support and psychological well-being in young adults. J Pers Assess1992; 58: 198–210.
39.
KaplanBJBushJWBerryCC. Health status: types of validity for the index of well-being. Health Serv Res1976; 11: 478–507.
40.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol1988; 54: 1063–1070.
41.
HerthK. Development and refinement of an instrument to measure hope. Schol Inq Nurs Pract1991; 5: 39–51.
42.
MillerJFPowerMJ. Development of an instrument to measure hope. J Nurs Res1988, 37: 6–10.
43.
ChubonRA. Manual for the Life Satisfaction Survey. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, School of Medicine, Department of Neuropsychiatry and Behavior Science, Rehabilitation Counseling Program, 1995.
44.
WareJESherbourneCD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-46). Med Care1992; 30: 473–483.
JerusalemMSchwarzerR. Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress-appraisal process. In: SchwarzerR (ed.) Self-efficacy: thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1992: 195–211.
47.
BombardierCBellKRTemkinAFannJRHoffmanJMDikmenS. The efficacy of a scheduled telephone intervention for ameliorating depressive symptoms during the first year after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil2009; 24: 230–238.
48.
BombardierCCunniffeMWadhwaniRGibbonsLEBlakeKDKraftGH. The efficacy of telephone counselling for health promotion in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2008; 89: 1849–1856.
49.
MohrDCLikowskyWBertagnolliA. Telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of depressive symptoms in multiple sclerosis. J Consult Clin Psychol2000; 68: 356–361.
50.
KazdinAEBlaseSL. Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness. Perspect Psychol Sci2011; 6: 21–37.
51.
MozerEFranklinBRoseJ. Psychotherapeutic intervention by telephone. Clin Interv Aging2008; 3: 391–396.
52.
ElliottTRBerryJW. Brief problem solving training for family caregivers of peresons with recent-onset spinal cord injuries: a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Psychol2009; 65: 406–422.
53.
Abdul LatifLDaud AmaderaJEPimentelDPimentelTFregniF. Sample size calculation in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a systematic review of reporting, characteristics and results in randomised controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2011; 92: 306–315.
54.
TuszyinskiMHSteevesJDFawcettJW. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial inclusion/exclusion criteria and ethics. Spinal Cord2007; 45: 222–231.
55.
Nicholson PerryKMiddletonJ. Comparison of a pain management program with usual care in a pain management centre for people with spinal cord injury-related chronic pain. Clin J Pain2010; 26: 206–216.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
