Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-5
Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment delivered via real-time telerehabilitation for the management of musculoskeletal conditions, and to determine if real-time telerehabilitation is comparable to conventional methods of delivery within this population.
Data sources:
Six databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PEDro, psycINFO, CINAHL) were searched from inception to November 2015 for literature which reported on the outcomes of real-time telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions.
Review methods:
Two reviewers screened 5913 abstracts where 13 studies (n = 1520) met the eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Downs & Black ‘Checklist for Measuring Quality’ tool. Results were pooled for meta-analysis based upon primary outcome measures and reported as standardised mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results:
Aggregate results suggest that telerehabilitation is effective in the improvement of physical function (SMD 1.63, 95%CI 0.92-2.33, I2=93%), whilst being slightly more favourable (SMD 0.44, 95%CI 0.19-0.69, I2=58%) than the control cohort following intervention. Sub-group analyses reveals that telerehabilitation in addition to usual care is more favourable (SMD 0.64, 95%CI 0.43-0.85, I2=10%) than usual care alone, whilst treatment delivered solely via telerehabilitation is equivalent to face-to-face intervention (SMD MD 0.14, 95% CI −0.10–0.37, I2 = 0%) for the improvement of physical function. The improvement of pain was also seen to be comparable between cohorts (SMD 0.66, 95%CI −0.27–1.60, I2=96%) following intervention.
Conclusions:
Real-time telerehabilitation appears to be effective and comparable to conventional methods of healthcare delivery for the improvement of physical function and pain in a variety of musculoskeletal conditions.
VosTFlaxmanADNaghaviMLozanoRMichaudCEzzatiM. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet2012;380:2163–2196.
2.
KlussmannAGebhardtHNublingMLiebersFPereaEQCordierW. Individual and occupational risk factors for knee osteoarthritis: results of a case-control study in Germany. Arthritis research & therapy2010;12:R88.
3.
Arthritis and Osteoporosis Victoria. ‘A Problem Worth Solving’: Arthritis and Osteoporosis Victoria state budget submission 2014–2015. Victoria, Australia: Arthritis and Osteoporosis Victoria, 2014.
4.
Bone and Joint Initiative USA. The burden of musculoskeletal disease in the United States (BMUS) Third Edition. Available at: http://www.boneandjointburden.org.
5.
ComansTRaymerMO’LearySSmithDScuffhamP. Cost-effectiveness of a physiotherapist-led service for orthopaedic outpatients. Journal Of Health Services Research & Policy2014;19:216–223.
6.
Daker-WhiteGCarrAJHarveyIWoolheadGBannisterGNelsonI. A randomised controlled trial. Shifting boundaries of doctors and physiotherapists in orthopaedic outpatient departments. Journal Of Epidemiology And Community Health1999;53:643–650.
7.
OldmeadowLBediHBurchHSmithJLeahyEGoldwasserM. Experienced physiotherapists as gatekeepers to hospital orthopaedic outpatient care. Medical Journal of Australia2007;186:625–628.
8.
RussellTG. Physical rehabilitation using telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare2007;13:217–220.
ClarkeMShahASharmaU. Systematic review of studies on telemontioring of patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare2011;17:7–14.
11.
DalleckLSchmidtLLuekerR. Cardiac rehabilitation outcomes in a conventional versus telemedicine- based programm. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare2011;17:217–221.
12.
BoyneJVrijhoefHCrijnsHDe WeerdGKragtenJGorgelsA. Tailored telemonitoring in patients with heart failure: results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. European journal of heart failure2012;14:791–801.
13.
McLeanSNurmatovULiuJPagliariCCarJSheikhA. Telehealthcare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Cochrane Review and meta-analysis. British Journal of General Practice2012;62:e739–749.
14.
LundellSHolmnerARehnBNybergAWadellK. Telehealthcare in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis on physical outcomes and dyspnea. Respiratory medicine2015;109:11–26.
15.
CruzJBrooksDMarquesA. Home telemonitoring effectiveness in COPD: a systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Practice2014;68:369–378.
16.
LaverKSchoeneDCrottyMGeorgeSLanninNSherringtonC. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database for Systematic reviews2013:1469–1493.
17.
JohanssonTWildC. Telerehabilitation in stroke care – a systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare2011;17:1–6.
18.
JoubertJJoubertLde BustosEWareDJacksonDHarrisonT. Telestroke in stroke survivors. Cerebrovascular diseases2009;27 (Suppl) 4:28–35.
19.
PietrzakECoteaCPullmanSNasveldP. Self-management and rehabilitation in osteoarthritis: is there a place for internet-based interventions?Telemedicine Journal And E-Health: The Official Journal Of The American Telemedicine Association2013;19:800–805.
20.
AgostiniMMojaLBanziRPistottiVToninPVenneriA. Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare2015;21:202–213.
21.
Centre for Reviews & Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking systematic reviews in healthcare. York, UK: York Publishing Services Ltd, 2009.
22.
DownsSBlackN. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of epidemiology and community health1998;52:377–384.
23.
DeeksJDinnesJD’AmicoRSowdenASakarovitchCSongF. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technology Assessment2003;7:1–173.
24.
FilbaySAckermanIRussellTMacriECrossleyK. Health-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine2014;42:1247–1255.
25.
HooperPJutaiJStrongGRussell-MindaE. Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology2008;43:180–187.
26.
SilvermanSSchertzLYuenHLowmanJBickelC. Systematic review of the methodological quality and outcome measures utilized in exercise interventions for adults with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord2012;50:718–727.
27.
National Health and Medical Research Council. How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence. Handbook series on preparing clinical practice guidelines. In: Council NHMR (ed). Canberra, Australia: National Health & Medical Research Council, 2000.
28.
SackettD. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest1989;95(2 suppl):2S–4S.
29.
Review Manager (RevMan). 5.3 ed.Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2014.
30.
RoosEToksvig-LarsenS. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes2003;1:17.
31.
RoosEKlassboMLohmanderL. WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology1999;28:210–215.
32.
WhitehouseSLLingardEAKatzJNLearmonthID. Development and testing of a reduced WOMAC function scale. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume2003;85-B:706–711.
33.
ErikssonLLindstromBGardGLysholmJ. Physiotherapy at a distance: A controlled study of rehabilitation at home after a shoulder joint operation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare2009;15:215–220.
34.
HozoSDjulbegovicBHozoI. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Medical Reserach Methodology2005;5(13).
35.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis in the Behavioural Sciences (Second Edition). Hillsdale, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, Inc., 1988.
36.
HigginsJGreenS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2011 (updated March2011). Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org
37.
HigginsJThompsonSDeeksJAltmanD. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ2003:557–560.
38.
EscobarAQuintanaJBilbaoAArosteguiILafuenteIVidaurretaI. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis and cartilage2007;15:273–80.
39.
HahnS. Understanding non-inferioirty trials. The Korean Pediatric Society2012;55:403–407.
40.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanD, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery2010;8:336–341.
41.
ShararehBSchwarzkopfR. Effectiveness of telemedical applications in postoperative follow-up after total joint arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty2014;29:918–22.e1.
42.
RussellTGButtrumPWoottonRJullGA. Internet-based outpatient telerehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal Of Bone And Joint Surgery American Volume2011;93:113–120.
43.
TousignantMMoffetHBoissyPCorriveauHCabanaFMarquisF. A randomized controlled trial of home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. Journal Of Telemedicine And Telecare2011;17:195–198.
44.
MoffetHTousignantMNadeauSMeretteCBoissyPCorriveauH. In-Home Telerehabilitation Compared with Face-to-Face Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Bone and Joint surgery American volume2015;97:1129–1141.
45.
SkolaskyRLMaggardAMLiDRileyIiiWegenerST. Health Behavior Change Counseling in Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Part I: Improvement in Rehabilitation Engagement and Functional Outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation2015;96:1200–1207.
46.
IlesRTaylorNFDavidsonMO’HalloranP. Telephone coaching can increase activity levels for people with non-chronic low back pain: a randomised trial. Journal Of Physiotherapy2011;57:231–238.
47.
HørdamBSabroeSPedersenPUMejdahlSSøballeK. Nursing intervention by telephone interviews of patients aged over 65 years after total hip replacement improves health status: A randomised clinical trial. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences2010;24:94–100.
48.
KosterinkSMHuisin‘t VeldRMHACagnieBHasenbringMVollenbroek-HuttenMMR. The clinical effectiveness of a myofeedback-based teletreatment service in patients with non-specific neck and shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Journal Of Telemedicine And Telecare2010;16:316–321.
49.
LiLLGanYYZhangLNWangYBZhangFQiJM. The effect of post-discharge telephone intervention on rehabilitation following total hip replacement surgery. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2014;1:207–211.
50.
AllenKDOddoneEZCoffmanCJDattaSKJuntillaKALindquistJH. Telephone-based self-management of osteoarthritis: A randomized trial. Annals Of Internal Medicine. 2010;153:570–579.
51.
PariserDO’HanlonAEspinozaL. Effects of telephone intervention on arthritis self-efficacy, depression, pain, and fatigue in older adults with arthritis. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. 2005;28:67–73.
52.
OdoleACOjoOD. Is telephysiotherapy an option for improved quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee?International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications2014;1:1-9.
53.
DowseyMMChoongPFM. The Utility of Outcome Measures in Total Knee Replacement Surgery. International Journal of Rheumatology2013;2013:8.
54.
Welfare AIoHa. Rural, regional and remote health: indicators of health status and determinants of health. In: Welfare AIoHa (ed). Rural Health Series no. 9. Cat. no. PHE 97. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2008.
ThakerDAMonypennyROlverISabesanS. Cost savings from a telemedicine model of care in northern Queensland, Australia. The Medical Journal Of Australia2013;199:414–417.
57.
SmithAScuffhamPWoottonR. The costs and potential savings of a novel telepaediatric service in Queensland. BMC health services research2007;7:35.
58.
RoditiDRobinsonME. The role of psychological interventions in the management of patients with chronic pain. Psychology research and behavior management2011;4:41–419.
59.
HoffmanBMPapasRKChatkoffDKKernsRD. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. Health Psychology2007;26:1–9.
60.
BanduraASimonK. The role of proximal intentions in self-regulation of refractory behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research1977;1:177–193.
61.
MarksR. Self-efficacy and arthritis disability: an updated synthesis of the evidence base and its relevance to optimal patient care. Health Psychology Open2014;1:1–18.
62.
MoussaviSChatterjiSVerdesETandonAPatelVUstunB. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet2007;370:851–858.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
