Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of eating utensil weight on kinematic performance in people with Parkinson’s disease.

Design: A counterbalanced repeated-measures design.

Setting: A motor control laboratory in a university setting.

Subjects: Eighteen adults with Parkinson’s disease and 18 age-matched controls.

Experimental conditions: Each participant performed a food transfer task using spoons of three different weights: lightweight (35 g), control (85 g) and weighted (135 g). Kinematic variables of arm movement were derived and compared between conditions.

Main measures: Kinematic variables of arm movement, including movement time, peak velocity and number of movement units.

Results: Utensil weights significantly affected the movement kinematics

of all participants. Both groups had fewer movement units in the lightweight condition (Parkinson’s disease group: 22.18, controls: 19.89) than in the weighted condition (Parkinson’s disease group: 22.68, controls: 21.36), suggesting smoother movement in the former condition. In addition, both groups had higher peak velocity in the lightweight than in the weighted condition.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a lightweight utensil may facilitate smoother and higher-velocity arm movement than a weighted one in people with Parkinson’s disease.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gillen G. Maximizing independence: occupational therapy intervention for patients with Parkinson’s disease. In Cote L , Sprinzeles LL , Elliott R , Kutscher AH. eds. Parkinson’s disease and quality of life. New York : Haworth, 2000: 65-67.

Newell KM Constraints on the development of coordination. In Wade MC , Whiting HTA. eds. Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986 : 341-60.

Newell KM , Valvano J. Therapeutic intervention as a constraint in learning and relearning movement skills. Scand J Occup Ther 1998; 5: 51-57.

Pedretti LW , Early MB Occupational therapy: practice skills for physical dysfunction,

fifth edition. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2001. 6 Radomski MV, Trombly LCA. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction, sixth edition. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.

Hewer RL , Cooper R. , Morgan MH An investigation into the value of treating intention tremor by weighting the affected limb. Brain 1972; 95: 579-90.

Morgan MH , Hewer RL , Cooper R. Application of an objective method of assessing intention tremor - a further study on the use of weights to reduce intention tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1975; 38: 259-64.

Homberg V. , Hefter H. , Reiners K. , Freund HJ Differential effects of changes in mechanical limb properties on physiological and pathological tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 568-79.

Meshack RP , Norman KE A randomized controlled trial of the effects of weights on amplitude and frequency of postural hand tremor in people with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 481-92.

10.

Muratori LM , McIsaac TL , Gordon AM , Santello M. Impaired anticipatory control of force sharing patterns during whole-hand grasping in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 2008; 185: 41-52.

11.

Rearick MP , Stelmach GE , Leis B. , Santello M. Coordination and control of forces during multifingered grasping in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol 2002; 177: 428-42.

12.

Santello M. , Muratori L. , Gordon AM Control of multidigit grasping in Parkinson’s disease: effect of object property predictability. Exp Neurol 2004; 187: 517-28.

13.

Rosenthal R. , Rosnow RL Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis, third edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.

14.

Marquardt C. , Mai N. A computational procedure for movement analysis in handwriting. J Neurosci Methods 1994; 52: 39-45.

15.

Marquardt C. 3DAwin. V 1.0. 3-Dimensional movement analysis. Munich : MedCom, 2000.

16.

Wing AM , Lough S. , Turton A. , Fraser C. , Jenner JR Recovery of elbow function in voluntary positioning of the hand following hemiplegia due to stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 126-34.

17.

Flowers K. Ballistic and corrective movements on an aiming task: intention tremor and parkinsonian movement disorders compared. Neurology 1975; 25: 413-21.

18.

Nelson WL Physical principles for economies of skilled movements. Biol Cybern 1983; 46: 135-47.

19.

Georgopoulos AP On reaching. Annu Rev Neurosci 1986; 9: 147-70.

20.

Brooks VB , Cooke JD , Thomas JS The continuity of movements. In Stein RB , Pearson KG , Smith RS , Redford JB. eds. Control of posture and locomotion. New York: Plenum Press, 1973: 257-72.

21.

Rosenthal R. , Rosnow RL , Rubin DB Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: a correlational approach . New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

22.

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, second edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.

23.

Hoehn MM , Yahr MD Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967; 17: 427-42.

24.

Fahn S. , Elton R. The unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. In Fahn S , Marsden C , Calne D , Goldstein M. eds. Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. New York : Macmillan, 1987: 153-304.

25.

Bertram CP , Lemay M. , Stelmach GE The effect of Parkinson’s disease on the control of multi-segmental coordination. Brain Cogn 2005; 57: 16-20.

The effect of eating utensil weight on functional arm movement in people with Parkinson’s disease: a controlled clinical trial

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References