Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective : To give a systematic review of clinical measurement scales used to assess trunk performance after stroke.

Data sources : The databases CINAHL, Cochrane, Pedro and PubMed were searched with the terms `sitting balance' plus `stroke' and `trunk' plus `stroke' mentioned in the title or abstract. Databases were searched from inception to January 2006.

Review methods : All articles were selected which reported or included a clinical measure of trunk performance used in an adult stroke population. Reference lists were searched as secondary sources of articles.

Results : A total of 458 articles resulted from the database search. Thirty-two articles were eligible for inclusion. Earlier studies mentioned ordinal single items or a combination of items which are part of a larger scale used to assess sitting balance as a derived measure of trunk performance. Three clinical tools were available which specifically evaluated trunk performance after stroke; the Trunk Control Test and two Trunk Impairment Scales.

Conclusion : Ordinal single items or subscales of existing larger scales lack a systematic evaluation of psychometric characteristics. Both Trunk Impairment Scales have been extensively examined. A comparative study assessing psychometric properties of the Trunk Control Test and two Trunk Impairment Scales could determine which should be the measure of choice when assessing trunk performance after stroke.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tennant A. , Geddes Jml , Fear J. , Hillman M. , Chamberlain MA Outcome following stroke . Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19: 278—84 .

van der Lee JH , Snels Iak , Beckerman H. , Lankhorst GJ , Wagenaar RC , Bouter LM Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials . Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 20—31 .

Van Peppen Rps , Kwakkel G. , Wood-Dauphinee S. , Hendriks Hjm , Van der Wees PhJ , Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence ? Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 833—62 .

Davies PM Right in the middle. Springer-Verlag , 1990: 31—65.

Wade DT , Skilbeck CE , Hewer RL Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke . Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 24—28 .

Feigin L. , Sharon B. , Czaczkes B. , Rosin AJ Sitting equilibrium 2 weeks after stroke can predict the walking ability after 6 months . Gerontology 1996; 42: 348—53 .

Kwakkel G. , Wagenaar RC , Kollen BJ , Lankhorst GJ Predicting disability in stroke — a critical review of the literature . Age Ageing 1996; 25: 479—89 .

Hsieh CL , Sheu CF , Hsueh IP , Wang CH Trunk control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients . Stroke 2002; 33: 2626—30 .

Tanaka S. , Hachisuka K. , Ogata H. Trunk rotatory muscle performance in post-stroke hemiplegic patients . Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76: 366—69 .

10.

Tanaka S. , Hachisuka K. , Ogata H. Muscle strength of trunk flexion-extension in post-stroke hemiplegic patients . Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 77: 288—90 .

11.

Karatas M. , Cetin N. , Bayramoglu M. , Dilek A. Trunk muscle strength in relation to balance and functional disability in unihemispheric stroke patients . Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 83: 81—87 .

12.

Bohannon RW Lateral trunk flexion strength: impairment, measurement reliability and implications following unilateral brain lesion . Int J Rehabil Res 1992; 15: 249—51 .

13.

Bohannon RW , Cassidy D. , Walsh S. Trunk muscle strength is impaired multidirectionally after stroke . Clin Rehabil 1995; 9: 47—51 .

14.

Bohannon RW Recovery and correlates of trunk muscle strength after stroke . Int J Rehabil Res 1995; 18: 162—67 .

15.

Dickstein R. , Heffes Y. , Laufer Y. , Ben-Haim Z. Activation of selected trunk muscles during symmetric functional activities in poststroke hemiparetic and hemiplegic patients . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66: 218—21 .

16.

Dickstein R. , Shefi S, Ben Haim Z, Shabtai E, Marcovici E. Activation of flexor and extensor trunk muscles in hemiparesis . Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79: 228—34 .

17.

Winzeler-Mercay U. , Mudie H. The nature of the effects of stroke on trunk flexor and extensor muscles during work and at rest . Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 875—86 .

18.

Dickstein R. , Shefi S. , Marcovitz E. , Villa Y. Anticipatory postural adjustment in selected trunk muscles in post stroke hemiparetic patients . Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 261—67 .

19.

Dickstein R. , Shefi S. , Marcovitz E. , Villa Y. Electromyographic activity of voluntary activated trunk flexor and extensor muscles in post-stroke hemiparetic subjects . Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 790—96 .

20.

Fujiwara T. , Sonoda S. , Okajima Y. , Chino N. The relationship between trunk function and the findings of transcranial magnetic stimulation among patients with stroke . J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 249—55 .

21.

Tsuji T. , Liu M. , Hase K. , Masakado Y. , Chino N. Trunk muscles in persons with hemiparetic stroke evaluated with computed tomography . J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 184—88 .

22.

Messier S. , Bourbonnais D. , Desrosiers J. , Roy Y. Dynamic analysis of trunk flexion after stroke . Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1619—24 .

23.

Sandin KJ , Smith BS The measure of balance in sitting in stroke rehabilitation prognosis . Stroke 1990; 21: 82—86 .

24.

Nieuwboer A. , Feys H. , De Weerdt W. , Nuyens G. , De Corte E. Developing a clinical tool to measure sitting balance after stroke: a reliability study . Physiotherapy 1995; 81: 439—45 .

25.

Lincoln N. , Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients . Physiotherapy 1979; 65: 48—51 .

26.

Adams SA , Ashburn A. , Pickering RM , Taylor D. The scalability of the rivermead motor assessment in acute stroke patients . Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 42—51 .

27.

Adams SA , Pickering RM , Ashburn A. , Lincoln NB The scalability of the rivermead motor assessment in nonacute stroke patients . Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 52—59 .

28.

Carr JH , Shepherd RB , Nordholm L. , Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients . Phys Ther 1985; 65: 175—80 .

29.

Loewen SC , Anderson BA Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales . Stroke 1990; 21: 78—81 .

30.

Poole JL , Whitney SL Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability . Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 195—97 .

31.

Gowland CA Staging motor impairment after stroke . Stroke 1990; 21(suppl II): II-19—21 .

32.

Gowland C. , Stratford P. , Ward M. et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment . Stroke 1993; 24: 58—63 .

33.

Benaim C. , Pérennou DA , Villy J. , Rousseaux M. , Pelissier JY Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients. The postural assessment scale for stroke patients (PASS) . Stroke 1999; 30: 1862—68 .

34.

Wang CH , Hsueh IP , Sheu CF , Hsieh CL Discriminative, predictive, and evaluative properties of a trunk control measure in patients with stroke . Phys Ther 2005; 85: 887—94 .

35.

Tsuji T. , Liu M. , Sonoda S. , Domen K. , Chino N. The stroke impairment assessment set: its internal consistency and predictive validity . Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 863—68 .

36.

Liu M. , Chino N. , Tuji T. , Masakado Y. , Hase K. , Kimura A. Psychometric properties of the stroke impairment assessment set (SIAS) . Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 339—51 .

37.

Collin C. , Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 576—79 .

38.

Franchignoni FP , Tesio L. , Ricupero C. , Martino MT Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome . Stroke 1997 ; 28: 1382—85 .

39.

Duarte E. , Marco E. , Muniesa JM et al. Trunk control test as a functional predictor in stroke patients . J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 267—72 .

40.

Verheyden G. , Nieuwboer A. , Mertin J. , Preger R. , Kiekens C. , De Weerdt W. The trunk impairment scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke . Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 326—34 .

41.

Verheyden G. , Nieuwboer A. , Feys H. , Thijs V. , Vaes K. , De Weerdt W. Discriminant ability of the trunk impairment scale: a comparison between stroke patients and healthy individuals . Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 1023—28 .

42.

Verheyden G. , Nuyens G. , Nieuwboer A. , Van Asch P. , Ketelaer P. , De Weerdt W. Reliability and validity of trunk assessment for people with multiple sclerosis . Phys Ther 2006; 86: 66—76 .

43.

Fujiwara T. , Liu M. , Tsuji T. et al. Development of a new measure to assess trunk impairment after stroke (trunk impairment scale): its psychometric properties . Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 83: 681—88 .

44.

Beevor CE Paralysis of the movements of the trunk in hemiplegia, and the muscles which are affected . BMJ 1909; April 10: 881—85 .

45.

Nichols DS , Miller L. , Colby LA , Pease WS Sitting balance: its relation to function in individuals with hemiparesis . Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 865—69 .

46.

Franchignoni F. Psychometric properties and practical attributes of the trunk control test in stroke patients . J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 150—51 .

47.

Verheyden G. , Vereeck L. , Truijen S. et al. Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability . Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 451—58 .

Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References