Rural service hubs and socially innovative rural-urban linkages: A conceptual framework for nexogenous development

Abstract

Co-locating services has become a common solution to the many longstanding challenges of service access and provision in rural areas. Rural service hubs – which offer two or more services at the same outlet – take many forms, typically responding to triggers for social innovation. Despite their growing ubiquity, however, rural service hubs have been little studied in comparative perspective. This article shifts the lens on service hubs from place-based solutions towards a broader, multi-scalar and multi-level perspective on rural connectivity. We propose a five dimension conceptual framework in contribution to the emerging theorisation of nexogenous rural development a model for resourceful reconnection beyond place and across rural–urban space. Drawing on examples from Austria, Finland and Wales, we illustrate how diverse service hub models mobilise social innovation, networks, scale and proximity to support service access and provision.

Keywords

Rural development rural–urban connectivity services of general interest service hubs social innovation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bock

(2016) Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis 56(4): 552–573.

Bosworth

Annibal

Carroll

, et al. (2015) Empowering local action through neo-endogenous development; the case of leader in England. Sociologia Ruralis 56(3): 427–449.

Christiaanse

Haartsen

(2017) The influence of symbolic and emotional meanings of rural facilities on reactions to closure: the case of the village supermarket. Journal of Rural Studies 54: 326–336.

Christiaanse

Haartsen

(2020) Experiencing place-change: a shared sense of loss after closure of village facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 69: 101432.

ENoLL (European Network of Living Labs) (2016) What are Living Labs? (ENoLL). 2016. Available at: https://enoll.org/about-us/(accessed 23 September 2021).

European Commission (2004) White paper on services of general interest. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:l23013b&from=EN (accessed 27 September 2021).

European Commission (2013) Guide to Social Innovation. DG Regional and Urban Policy. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/file/759/download_en%3Ftoken=mNGSe_T7 (accessed 27 September 2021).

European Commission (2017) European Pillar of Social Rights. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Available at: https://europe-solidarity.eu/documents/social-pillar-goteborg.pdf (accessed 27 September 2021).

Fassmann

Rauhut

Costa

EMd

, et al. (2015) Introduction: contextual, legal and policy perspectives on services of general interest. In: Fassmann

Rauhut

Marques da Costa

, et al. (eds) Services of General Interest and Territorial Cohesion: European Perspectives and National Insights. Vienna, Austria: Vienna University Press, 11–24.

10.

Flyvbjerg

(2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219–245.

11.

Furuseth

(1998) Service provision and social deprivation. In: Ilbery

(ed) The Geography of Rural Change. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 233–256.

12.

Gieling

Haartsen

Vermeij

(2019) Village facilities and social place attachment in the rural Netherlands. Rural Sociology 84(1): 66–92.

13.

Gkartzios

Scott

(2014) Placing housing in rural development: exogenous, endogenous and neo-endogenous approaches. Sociologia Ruralis 54(3): 241–265.

14.

Gkartzios

Lowe

(2019) Revisiting neo-endogenous rural development. In: Scott

Gallent

Gkartzios

(eds) The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning. New York, NY: Routledge.

15.

Gray

Shaw

Farrington

(2006) Community transport, social capital and social exclusion in rural areas. Area 38(1): 89–98.

16.

Goodwin-Hawkins

Oedl-Wieser

Bauchinger

, et al. (2020) Rural Service Hubs. Short Report of public infrastructure and social service CoP of ROBUST Horizon2020 project. Available at: https://rural-urban.eu/sites/default/files/ROBUST_short-report_service-hubs_FINAL_JULY2020.pdf (accessed 27 September 2021).

17.

Halseth

Markey

Ryser

(2018) Introduction. In: Halseth

Markey

Ryser

(eds) Service Provision and Rural Sustainability: Infrastructure and Innovation. London, UK: Routledge, 3–18.

18.

Hamilton

(2016) Changing service provision in rural areas and the possible impact on older people: a case example of compulsory post office closures and outreach services in England. Social Policy and Society 15(3): 387–401.

19.

Hillyard

(2020) The enduring insignificance of a school for its village: an English case study. Journal of Rural Studies 80: 618–625.

20.

Jones

Woods

(2013) New localities. Regional Studies 47: 29–42.

21.

Lättman

Friman

Olsson

(2016) Perceived accessibility of public transport as a potential indicator of social inclusion. Social Inclusion 4(3): 36–45.

22.

Lyndon

Edwards

(2021) Beyond listening: the value of co-research in the co-construction of narratives. Qualitative Research. Online First. DOI: 10.1177/1468794121999600.

23.

Markham

Bosworth

(2016) The village pub in the twenty-first century: embeddedness and the “Local”. In: Cabras

Higgins

Preece

(eds) Brewing, Beer and Pubs: A Global Perspective. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 266–281.

(2018). Methodological framework for case studies. Horizon 2020 ROBUST project, Deliverable 3.1.

(2004) Multi-service outlets in rural England: the co-location of disparate services. Planning Practice and Research 19(4): 375–391.

26.

Neumeier

(2012) Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? - Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis 52(1): 48–69.

27.

Neumeier

(2017) Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success. The Geographical Journal 183(1): 34–46.

28.

Noack

Federwisch

(2019) Social innovation in rural regions: urban impulses and cross-border constellations of actors. Sociologia Ruralis 59(1): 92–112.

29.

Noguera Tur

Ferrandis Martínez

(2014) Accessibility and provision of services of general interest in rural areas of the European Union: an analysis of the Eurobarometer. Boletín de la Asociación de Geografós Españoles 64: 489–493.

, et al. (2015) Kyläkaupan Palveluopas. Finland: University of Turku, University of Jyväskylä, PTY. https://www.pty.fi/fileadmin/user_upload/tiedostot/Julkaisut/Esitteet/Kylakaupan_palveluopas_web.pdf (Last accessed 24 September 2021).

31.

OECD (2006) The new rural paradigm. OECD Rural Policy Reviews. Available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/the-new-rural-paradigm_9789264023918-en (accessed 27 September 2021).

32.

OECD (2010) Strategies to improve rural service delivery. OECD rural policy reviews. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/oecdruralpolicyreviewsstrategiestoimproveruralservicedelivery.htm (accessed 27 September 2021).

33.

OECD (2020) Rural well-being: geographies of opportunities. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/rural-well-being-d25cef80-en.htm (accessed 27 September 2021).

34.

Polman

Slee

Kluvánková

, et al. (2017) Classification of Social Innovations for Marginalized Rural Areas. ■■■: Horizon 2020 SIMRA project deliverable 2.1. Available at: http://www.simra-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/D2.1-Classification-of-SI-for-MRAs-in-the-target-region.pdf (accessed 27 September 2021).

35.

Pyrko

Dörfler

Eden

(2017) Thinking together: what makes communities of practice work? Human Relations 70(4): 389–409. DOI: 10.1177/0018726716661040.

, et al. (2021) Resilient research in the field: insights and lessons from adapting qualitative research projects during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20: 1–16.

37.

Ravazzoli

Valero López

(2020) Social innovation: an instrument to achieve the sustainable development of communities. In: Leal Filho

Brandli

, et al. (eds) Sustainable Cities and Communities. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 1–10.

38.

Ray

(2006) Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In: Cloke

Marsden

Moony

(eds) Handbook of Rural Studies. London, UK: Sage, 278–291.

39.

Ritala

Almpanopoulou

(2017) In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation ecosystem. Technovation 60-61: 39–42.

40.

Shortall

(2008) Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies 24(4): 450–457.

41.

Shucksmith

(2010) Disintegrated rural development? Neo-endogenous rural development, planning and place-shaping in diffused power contexts. Sociologia Ruralis 50: 1–14.

42.

Skerratt

(2010) Hot spots and not spots: addressing infrastructure and service provision through combined approaches in rural Scotland. Sustainability 2: 1719–1741.

43.

Skerratt

Hall

(2011) Community ownership of physical assets: challenges, complexities and implications. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 26(3): 170–181.

44.

Skerratt

(2018) Recharging Rural: Creating Sustainable Communities to 2030 and beyond. London, UK: The Prince’s Countryside Fund. Available at: https://www.princescountrysidefund.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/recharging-rural-full-report-final.pdf (accessed 27 September 2021).

45.

Stickdorn

Schneider

(2019) This Is Service Design Thinking. Amsterdam, Netherlands: BIS Publishers.

46.

Stulz

Pichler

Kawohl

, et al. (2018) The gravitational force of mental health services: distance decay effects in a rural Swiss service area. BMC Health Services Research 18(1–13): 81.

47.

Torré

Wallet

Corsi

, et al. (2021) Introduction: is there a smart development for rural areas? In: Torre

Corsi

Steiner

, et al. (eds) Smart Development for Rural Areas. London, UK: Routledge, 1–27.

48.

Van Assche

Beunen

Duinevel

, et al. (2021) Adaptive methodology. Topic, theory, method and data in ongoing conversation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2021.1964858.,

, et al. (2020) Carrying out rapid qualitative research during a pandemic: emerging lessons from COVID-19. Qualitative Health Research 30(14): 2192–2204.

(2021a) Kyläkauppatuki 2019–2021. Luonnonvara- ja biotalouden tutkimus 46/2021. Luonnonvarakeskus. Helsinki. Available at: http://urn.fi/URN (Last accessed 24 September 2021).

51.

Voutilainen

Korhonen

Ovaska

(2021b) Mökkibarometri 2021. Luonnonvara- ja biotalouden tutkimus 47/2021. Luonnonvarakeskus. Helsinki. Available at: http://urn.fi/URN (Last accessed 24 September 2021).

52.

Wenger

(1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Yin

(2017) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.