The foundational economy’s heightened traction in academic and policy discussion stems in part from its potential to mitigate challenges faced by less-developed regions. While supporting foundational sectors may contribute to inclusive and sustainable growth, we question whether digitalisation can enable these aims. Through a case study of Wales, we point to the differences in digital capability of foundational and non-foundational businesses in urban and rural parts of the region. We show that while investment in digital infrastructure and digital technology use may support the foundational economy, digital barriers risk countering the benefits of its sectors’ embeddedness and exacerbating spatial divides.
ArcidiaconoDPaisI (2020) Re-embedding the economy within digitalized foundational sectors: the case of platform cooperativism. In: BarberaFJonesIR (eds) The Foundational Economy and Citizenship: Comparative Perspectives on Civil Repair. Bristol University Press, 27–50.
2.
BaileyDDe ProprisL (2019) Industry 4.0, regional disparities and transformative industrial policy. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books1(2): 67–78.
3.
BarberaFRees JonesI (2020) The Foundational Economy and Citizenship: Comparative Perspectives on Civil Repair. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
4.
BarzottoMCorradiniCFaiF, et al. (2020) Smart specialisation, Industry 4.0 and lagging regions: some directions for policy. Regional Studies, Regional Science7(1): 318–332.
5.
BassensDKębłowskiWLambertD (2020) Placing cities in the circular economy: neoliberal urbanism or spaces of socio-ecological transition?. Urban Geography41(6): 1–5.
6.
BearsonDKenneyMZysmanJ (2021) Measuring the impacts of labor in the platform economy: new work created, old work reorganized, and value creation reconfigured. Industrial and Corporate Change30(3): 536–563.
7.
BenthamJBowmanAde la CuestaM, et al. (2013) Manifesto for the Foundational Economy. Manchester: Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change.
8.
BirchKMackinnonDCumbersA (2010) Old industrial regions in Europe: a comparative assessment of economic performance. Regional Studies44(1): 35–53.
CoenenLMoodyssonJMartinH (2015) Path renewal in old industrial regions: possibilities and limitations for regional innovation policy. Regional Studies49(5): 850–865.
11.
DeasIHaughtonGWardK (2020). Scalar postpolitics, inclusive growth and inclusive economies: challenging the Greater Manchester agglomeration model. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society.
12.
De BoeckSBassensDRyckewaertM (2019) Making space for a more foundational economy: The case of the construction sector in Brussels. Geoforum105: 67–77.
13.
EngelenEFroudJJohalS, et al. (2017) The grounded city: from competitivity to the foundational economy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society10(3): 407–423.
EstelaO (2019) The foundational Economy and strategic planning in Barcelona: reshaping the urban economy from the bottom up. Renewal: A Journal of Labour Politics27(2): 33–39.
16.
FeijóoCRamosSArmuñaC, et al. (2018) A study on the deployment of high-speed broadband networks in NUTS3 regions within the framework of digital agenda for Europe. Telecommunications Policy42(9): 682–699.
17.
FeldmanMGuyFIammarinoS (2021) Regional income disparities, monopoly and finance. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society14(1): 25–49.
FroudJHaslamCJohalS, et al. (2020) (How) does productivity matter in the foundational economy?. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit35(4): 316–336.
20.
GreenAParkeCHooleC, et al. (2021) Unlocking Inclusive Growth by Linking Micro Assets to Anchor Institutions: The Case of Skilled Overseas Migrants and Refugees and Hospital Jobs. Thousand Oaks, CA: European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–16.
21.
GrubesicTHMackEA (2016) Broadband Telecommunications and Regional Development. Abingdon: Oxon: Routledge.
22.
HansenT (2021) The foundational economy and regional development. Regional Studies: 1–10.
23.
HassinkR (2020) Regions and Innovation Policies in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Advancing place-based regional innovation policies
JohalSMoranMWilliamsK (2017) Avoiding ‘back to the future’ policies by reforming the ‘foundational economy. In: JonesO’DonnellBM (ed) Alternatives to Neoliberalism: Towards Equality and Democracy, 175–192.
29.
JonesRGoodwin‐HawkinsBWoodsM (2020) From territorial cohesion to regional spatial justice: the well‐being of future generations act in wales. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research44(5): 894–912.
KenneyMZysmanJ (2016) The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology32: 61.
32.
LeaverAWilliamsK (2014) After the 30-year experiment: the future of the 'foundational economy'. Juncture21(3): 215–221.
33.
LeeN (2019) Inclusive Growth in cities: a sympathetic critique. Regional Studies53(3): 424–434.
34.
LeeNSissonsP (2016) Inclusive growth? The relationship between economic growth and poverty in British cities. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(11): 2317–2339.
35.
MasonCBrownRHartM, et al. (2015) High growth firms, jobs and peripheral regions: the case of Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society8(2): 343–358.
36.
MorganK (2019) 7. The future of place-based innovation policy (as if 'lagging regions' really mattered). Regional Studies Policy Impact Books1(2): 79–89.
NygaardBHansenT (2020) Local development through the foundational economy? Priority-setting in Danish municipalities. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit35: 768–786.
39.
PikeARodríguez-PoseATomaneyJ (2017) Shifting horizons in local and regional development. Regional Studies51(1): 46–57.
40.
PolanyiK (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
41.
PughRMacKenzieNGJones-EvansD (2018) From 'Techniums' to 'emptiums': the failure of a flagship innovation policy in Wales. Regional Studies52(7): 1009–1020.
42.
QuinonesGHeeksRNicholsonB (2020) Embeddedness of digital start-ups in development contexts: field experience from latin America. Information Technology for Development: 1–20.
43.
SaldañaJ (2021) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London, UK: Sage.
44.
SaleminkKStrijkerDBosworthG (2017) Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies54: 360–371.
45.
ShemiAPProcterC (2018) E-commerce and entrepreneurship in SMEs: case of myBot. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development25(3): 501–520.
46.
ThompsonMNowakVSouthernA, et al. (2020) Re-grounding the city with Polanyi: from urban entrepreneurialism to entrepreneurial municipalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space52(6): 1171–1194.
47.
TownsendLSathiaseelanAFairhurstG, et al. (2013) Enhanced broadband access as a solution to the social and economic problems of the rural digital divide. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit28(6): 580–595.
48.
TranosEGillespieA (2009) The spatial distribution of internet backbone networks in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies16(4): 423–437.
49.
TranosENijkampP (2013) The death of distance revisited: Cyber-place, physical and relational proximities. Journal of Regional Science53(5): 855–873.
50.
TripplMOttoA (2009) How to turn the fate of old industrial areas: a comparison of cluster-based renewal processes in Styria and the Saarland. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space41(5): 1217–1233.
51.
WhiteMC (2004) Inward investment, firm embeddedness and place. European Urban and Regional Studies11(3): 243–260.
52.
WoodAJGrahamMLehdonvirtaV, et al. (2019) Networked but commodified: the (dis)embeddedness of digital labour in the gig economy. Sociology53(5): 931–950.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
