This article discusses the contribution of innovation centres in nearby neighbourhoods based on primary data. This paper involves the study of the case of Ruta N in Medellín to expose the relationship between a consolidated neighbourhood and new innovation facilities. Ruta N was founded after the implementation of a city-level policy for innovation intended to secure the economic growth of a former deprived area of the city. This innovation attracted local and international creative entrepreneurs to Medellín’s downtown but with inconsistent results. The analysis revealed that Ruta N rarely interacts with the nearby neighbourhood, thus restricting its potential to contribute to the community. Instead, it is perceived that Ruta N takes advantage of the neighbourhood to meet the needs of Ruta N users, not the other way around. As a result, community members argue that Ruta N could promote potential conflicts in the area.
CáceresAMCarvajalCCMirandaAM, et al. (2008) Métodos de Investigación Social: Una Aproximación Desde las Estrategias Cuantitativas y Cualitativas. Antofagasta: Universidad Católica del Norte.
6.
Cámara de Comercio de Medellín (CCMA) (2019) Estructura Empresarial Antioqueña 2018. Medellín: Grupo de Estudios Económicos.
7.
CarrollR (2014) Oakland: The city that told Google to get lost. The Guardian, 11 February.
8.
CasellasA (2006)
Las limitaciones del «modelo Barcelona». Una lectura desde urban regime analysis. Documents D’anàlisi Geogràfica48: 61–81.
9.
CastellsMHallP (2014) Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st-Century Industrial Complexes.
London:
Routledge.
10.
Centro de Estudios de Opinión (CEO) (2015) Universidad de Antioquia. Caracterización física, económica y sociodemográfica (aspectos cuantitativos y cualitativos) del poligono del Distrito Medellinovation, barrios El Chagualo, Jesús Nazareno, Sevilla y parte de San Pedro. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia.
11.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis.
London:
Sage.
12.
ClarkJHuangH-IWalshJP (2010)
A typology of ‘innovation districts’: What it means for regional resilience. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society3(1): 121–137.
13.
Corporación Ruta N (2011) Informe de gestión. Available at: www.rutanmedellin.org/ (accessed July 2017).
14.
Corporación Ruta N (2012) Informe de gestión. Available at: www.rutanmedellin.org/ (accessed July 2017).
15.
Corporación Ruta N (2013) Informe de gestión. Available at: www.rutanmedellin.org/ (accessed July 2017).
16.
Corporación Ruta N (2018) Informe de gestión. Available at: www.rutanmedellin.org/ (accesed June 2020).
17.
CuenyaBCorralM (2011)
Empresarialismo, economía del suelo y grandes proyectos urbanos: El modelo de Puerto Madero en Buenos Aires. EURE37(111): 25–45.
18.
Dávila JD (ed) (2012) Movilidad Urbana y Pobreza: Aprendizajes de Medellín y Soacha, Colombia. Medellín: Development Planning Unit, University College London and Facultad de Arquitectura, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Duque FrancoI (2015)
La cultura como estrategia de transformación y promoción urbana en Bogotá y Medellín. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande61: 25–43.
22.
EcheverriAOrsiniFM (2011)
Informalidad y urbanismo social en Medellín. Sostenible?
12: 11–24.
23.
FloridaR (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life.
New York:
Basic Books.
24.
FloridaR (2017) The New Urban Crisis: How Our Cities Are Increasing Inequality, Deepening Segregation, and Failing the Middle Class – And What We Can Do about It.
New York:
Basic Books.
25.
FranzT (2018)
Power balances, transnational elites, and local economic governance: The political economy of development in Medellín. Local Economy33(1): 85–109.
26.
Garcia-AyllonS (2016)
Rapid development as a factor of imbalance in urban growth of cities in Latin America: A perspective based on territorial indicators. Habitat International58: 127–142.
27.
GlaeserELKolkoJSaizA (2001)
Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography1(1): 27–50.
28.
HaaseAKabischSSteinführerA, et al. (2010)
Emergent spaces of reurbanisation: Exploring the demographic dimension of inner‐city residential change in a European setting. Population, Space and Place16(5): 443–463.
29.
HuttonTA (2004)
The new economy of the inner city. Cities21(2): 89–108.
30.
HyraDS (2012)
Conceptualizing the new urban renewal: Comparing the past to the present. Urban Affairs Review48(4): 498–527.
31.
KatzBWagnerJ (2014) The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America.
Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution.
32.
KnightRV (1995)
Knowledge-based development: Policy and planning implications for cities. Urban Studies32(2): 225–260.
33.
LandryC (2012) The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators.
London:
Earthscan.
34.
McGuirkJ (2014) Radical Cities: Across Latin America in Search of a New Architecture.
London:
Verso Books.
35.
Marrero GuillamónI (2003)
¿Del Manchester catalán al Soho barcelonés? La renovación del barrio del Poblenou en Barcelona y la cuestión de la vivienda. Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales146(137): 1–16.
36.
Morales RamírezN (2009) Estrategias Discursivas de Control Social en la Planeación Del Espacio Público Del Centro de Medellín: Eje Carabobo, 2004–2007.
Bogotá:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
37.
MorissonABevilacquaC (2019) Beyond innovation districts: The case of Medellinnovation districts. In: Calabró F, Della Spina L and Bevilacqua C (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives Local Knowledge and Innovation Dynamics Towards Territory Attractiveness Through the Implementation of Horizon/E2020/Agenda2030 – Vol 1. Switzerland: Springer, Cham, pp. 3–11.
38.
PeckJ (2005)
Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29(4): 740–770.
39.
PopeNE (2002) A Tale of Two Towns: Conflations of Global and Local in the New Media Spaces of Belltown and Yaletown. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
40.
RamírezMJKapsteinP (2016)
Regeneración urbana integrada: Proyectos de acupuntura en Medellín. REVISTARQUIS5(1): 86–103.
41.
RestrepoNM (2014)
Urbanismo social en Medellín: Una aproximación a partir de la utilización estratégica de los derechos. Estudios Políticos45: 205–222.
42.
SánchezA (2012) La Reinvención de Medellín (Documentos de Trabajo Sobre Economía Regional, n. 174).
Cartagena:
Banco de la República.
43.
ScottAJ (2006)
Creative cities: Conceptual issues and policy questions. Journal of Urban Affairs28(1): 1–17.
44.
SevillaACastrilloMMatesanzÁ, et al. (2014)
¿Regeneración urbana? Deconstrucción y reconstrucción de un concepto incuestionado. Papeles de Relaciones Ecosociales y Cambio Global126: 129–139.
45.
SlaterT (2006)
The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30(4): 737–757.
46.
TurokI (2014)
The seventh world urban forum in Medellin: Lessons for city transformation. Local Economy29(6–7): 575–578.
47.
VanoloA (2008)
The image of the creative city: Some reflections on urban branding in Turin. Cities25(6): 370–382.
48.
YinRK (2017) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications.
49.
ZippS (2013)
The roots and routes of urban renewal. Journal of Urban History39(3): 366–391.
