Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Decision-making in urban contexts is increasingly characterized by a depoliticized environment that has normalized neoliberal urban policies. These are further pursued in post-disaster contexts across the globe with narratives that overshadow the views and demands of the affected communities. Spatial contestation, exclusion of certain groups from key decisions and episodes of non-decision-making thus shape urban redevelopment through top-down governance. This paper provides a Lukesian narrative on post-earthquake Christchurch, where the redevelopment of the city has been characterized by a strong command-and-control rebuild agenda emanating from the national government, regardless of the feedback and criticisms from the affected community.

Keywords

decision-making grassroots organizations non-decision-making post-disaster governance power spatial contestation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(2013) Markets of Sorrow, Labors of Faith: New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina, Durham, PA: Duke University Press.

Allmendinger

Haughton

(2012) Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37(1): 89–103.

Allmendinger

Tewdwr-Jones

(2002) The communicative turn in urban planning: Unravelling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions. Space and Polity 6(1): 5–24.

Amore

(2016) The governance of built heritage in the post-earthquake Christchurch CBD. In: Hall

Malinen

Vosslamber

et al. (eds) Business and Post-disaster Management: Business, Organisational and Consumer Resilience and the Christchurch Earthquakes, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 200–218.

Amore

Hall

(2016) “Regeneration is the focus now”: Anchor projects and delivering a new CBD for Christchurch. In: Hall

Malinen

Vosslamber

et al. (eds) Business and Post-disaster Management: Business, Organisational and Consumer Resilience and the Christchurch Earthquakes, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 181–199.

Amore

Hall

(2017a) National and urban public policy agenda in tourism. Towards the emergence of a hyperneoliberal script? International Journal of Tourism Policy 7(1): 4–22.

Amore

Hall

(2017b) Sports and event-led regeneration strategies in post-earthquake Christchurch. In: Wise

Harris

(eds) Regeneration, Events, Sport and Tourism, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 100–118.

Arts Voice (2014) About arts voice. Available at: www.artsvoice.org.nz/about-arts-voice/ (accessed 12 November 2014).

Atkinson

(2013) Toward Resilient Communities: Examining the Impacts of Local Governments in Disasters, New York: Routledge.

10.

Bachrach

Baratz

(1962) Two faces of power. American Political Science Review 56(4): 947–952.

11.

Bachrach

Baratz

(1970) Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Bachrach

Baratz

(1975) Power and its two faces revisited: A reply to Geoffrey Debnam. American Political Science Review 69(3): 900–904.

13.

Bakema

Parra

McCann

et al.

Governance in shaky societies: Experiences and lessons from Christchurch after the earthquakes. Environmental Policy and Governance. 201727(4): 365–377.

14.

Barrios

(2011) “If you did not grow up here, you cannot appreciate living here”: Neoliberalism, space-time, and affect in post-Katrina recovery planning. Human Organization 70(2): 118–127.

15.

Berke

Campanella

(2006) Planning for postdisaster resiliency. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604(1): 192–207.

16.

Blanco

(2015) Disaster governance in the Philippines: Issues, lessons learned, and future directions in the Post-Yolanda super typhoon aftermath. International Journal of Public Administration 38(10): 743–756.

17.

Brazendale

(2013) The preservation of heritage buildings in the wake of the Canterbury earthquakes. New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law 17: 237–289.

18.

Brookie

(2012) Governing the Recovery from the Canterbury Earthquakes 2010–11: The Debate Over Institutional Design, Wellington: Victoria University.

19.

Brownlee G (2011) New authority will deliver for Canterbury (Press release). Available at: www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-authority-will-deliver-canterbury (accessed 31 October 2016).

20.

Brownlee G (2012) New unit for the rebuild of central Christchurch (Press release). Available at: www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/launch-central-christchurch-development-unit (accessed 13 November 2013).

21.

Brownlee G (2015) Regeneration the focus of Chch governance (Press release). Available at: www.beehive.govt.nz/release/regeneration-focus-chch-governance (accessed 28 July 2015).

22.

Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011 (2011 No 12).

23.

CCC (2011a) Central City Plan. Draft Central City Recovery Plan for Ministerial Approval – December 2011, Christchurch: Christchurch City Council.

24.

CCC (2011b) Draft Central City Plan – August 2011, Volume 1, Christchurch: Christchurch City Council.

25.

CCC (2011c) Share an Idea. Available at: www.ccc.govt.nz/homeliving/civildefence/chchearthquake/ShareAnIdea.aspx (accessed 10 November 2014).

26.

CCC (2012) Council votes to keep Town Hall (Press release). Available at: www.ccc.govt.nz/thecouncil/newsmedia/mediareleases/2012/201211222.aspx (accessed 3 March 2014).

27.

CCC (2013) Town Hall Conservation and Overall Performing Arts Precinct, Christchurch: Christchurch City Council.

28.

CCC (2015) Rebuilding the Central City with the Performing Arts: The Vision for the Performing Arts Precinct, Christchurch: Christchurch City Council.

29.

CCDU (2012) Christchurch Central Business District Blueprint – Implementing Anchor Projects, Christchurch: Christchurch Central Development Unit.

30.

CCDU (2013) FAQ – General. Available at: www.ccdu.govt.nz/faq/general (accessed 4 November 2013).

31.

CERA (2011a) Paper 1: Proposed Governance Arrangements. Wellington: Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority.

32.

CERA (2011b) Paper 2: Proposed Powers. Wellington: Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority.

33.

CERA (2011c) Paper 2: Proposed Powers – Annex 2 – Regulatory Impact Statement. Wellington: Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority.

34.

CERA (2012a) Meeting‐Notes‐2012‐07‐05. Christchurch: Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority.

35.

CERA (2012b) Meeting‐Notes‐2012‐07‐19. Christchurch: Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority.

36.

CERA (2012c) Annual Review of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011, Christchurch: Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority.

37.

Chamlee-Wright

Storr

(2009) Filling the Civil-Society Vacuum: Post-disaster Policy and Community Response, George Mason, VA: George Mason University.

38.

Chandrasekhar

(2010) Understanding stakeholder participation in post-disaster recovery (case study: Nagapattinam, India), Urbana: University of Illinois. Doctoral dissertation.

39.

Chandrasekhar

(2012) Digging deeper: Participation and non-participation in post-disaster community recovery. Community Development 43(5): 614–629.

40.

Chapman K (2011) Lives before Christchurch earthquake damaged historic buildings. The Press, 1 March. Available at: www.stuff.co.nz/national/christchurch-earthquake/4715003/Lives-before-Christchurch-earthquake-damaged-historic-buildings (accessed 15 April 2014).

41.

Cho

(2014) Post-tsunami recovery and reconstruction: governance issues and implications of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Disasters 38(2): 157–178.

42.

CORE (2011) Initial submission for the rebuilding of Christchurch Central City (Press release). Available at: www.facebook.com/notes/178343008885628/ (accessed 2 April 2015).

43.

Crenson

(1971) The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-decision-Making in the Cities, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

44.

Cryle

Hillier

(2005) Consent and Consensus. Politics, Media and Governance in Twentieth Century Australia, Perth: API Network, Australia Research Institute.

45.

Dahl

(1961) Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City (Vol. 4). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

46.

Damiani

(2008) Capitalization of post-9/11 recovery. In: Gunewardena

Schuller

de Waal

(eds) Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neoliberal Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction, Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, pp. 157–171.

47.

Dann JM (2014) Those left standing: The Town Hall. Rebuilding Christchurch: One Brick, One Word, One city, available from: www.rebuildingchristchurch.wordpress.com/2014-07-22/those-left-standing-the-town-hall/ (accessed 8 July 2015).

48.

Davidson

Johnson

Lizarralde

et al. (2007) Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat International 31(1): 100–115.

49.

Doorne

(1998) Power, participation and perception: An insider's perspective on the politics of the Wellington waterfront redevelopment. Current Issues in Tourism 1(2): 129–166.

50.

DPMC (2012) Amended Cabinet Minute (12) 11/20. Christchurch CBD Recovery. Minute of Decision, Wellington: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

51.

Duval-Diop

Curtis

Clark

(2010) Enhancing equity with public participatory GIS in hurricane rebuilding: Faith based organizations, community mapping, and policy advocacy. Community Development 41(1): 32–49.

52.

Finsterwalder

Hall

(2016) Disasters, urban regeneration and the temporality of servicescapes. In: Hall

Malinen

Vosslamber

et al. (eds) Business and Post-disaster Management: Business, Organisational and Consumer Resilience and the Christchurch Earthquakes, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 230–249.

53.

Flyvbjerg

(1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

54.

Fuller

(2010) Crisis and institutional change in urban governance. Environment and Planning A 42(5): 1121–1137.

55.

Gap Filler (2014) About gap filler. Available at: www.gapfiller.org.nz/ (accessed 19 October 2014).

56.

Gates C (2013) Town Hall option may hurt CSO. The Press, 15 August, A.5.

57.

Geddes

Wagner

(2013) Why do U.S. states adopt public–private partnership enabling legislation? Journal of Urban Economics 78(1): 30–41.

58.

Geddis A (2010) An open letter to New Zealand's people and their Parliament. Available at: www.pundit.co.nz/content/an-open-letter-to-new-zealands-people-and-their-parliament (accessed 7 May 2015).

59.

Glück Z (2013) Race, class, and disaster gentrification. Available at: www.tidalmag.org/blog/race-class-and-disaster-gentrification/ (accessed 22 December 2014).

60.

Gotham

(2012) Disaster, Inc: Privatization and post-Katrina rebuilding in New Orleans. Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 633–646.

61.

Gotham

(2016) Re-anchoring capital in disaster-devastated spaces: Financialisation and the Gulf Opportunity (GO) Zone programme. Urban Studies 53(7): 1362–1383.

62.

Gotham

Greenberg

(2008) From 9/11 to 8/29: Post-disaster recovery and rebuilding in New York and New Orleans. Social Forces 87(2): 1039–1062.

63.

Gotham

Greenberg

(2014) Crisis Cities: Disaster and Redevelopment in New York and New Orleans, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

64.

Greenberg

(2008) Branding New York: How a City in Crisis Was Sold to the World, London: Routledge.

65.

Greenhill M (2013a) Landowner says ‘take the money’. The Press, 31 May. Available at: www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/the-rebuild/8739311/Landowner-says-take-the-money (accessed 8 May 2014).

66.

Greenhill M (2013b) Notable omission in stadium land grab. The Press, 20 March. Available at: www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/the-rebuild/8446697/Notable-omissions-in-stadium-land-grab (accessed 12 June 2016).

67.

Greenhill M (2013c) Town Hall, or arts precinct? The Press, 6 July, A.3.

68.

Hall

(2013) Regeneration and cultural quarters: Changing urban cultural space. In: Smith

Richards

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Cultural Tourism, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 332–338.

69.

Hall

Malinen

Vosslamber

et al. (2016a) Introduction: The business, organisational and destination impacts of natural disasters – The Christchurch Earthquakes 2010–2011. In: Hall

Malinen

Vosslamber

et al. (eds) Business and Post-disaster Management: Business, Organisational and Consumer Resilience and the Christchurch Earthquakes, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 3–20.

70.

Hall

Malinen

Vosslamber

et al. (2016b) Business and Post-disaster Management: Business, Organisational and Consumer Resilience and the Christchurch Earthquakes, Abingdon: Routledge.

71.

Harding

(2016) Public-private partnerships in the UK. In: Pierre

(ed.) Partnerships in Urban Governance: European and American Experiences, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 71–92.

72.

Hartevelt J (2011) All power to CERA as bill passes. The Press, 15 April. Available at: www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/4890566/All-power-to-Cera-as-bi (accessed 7 May 2015)/.

73.

Harvey

(2012) Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography, Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.

74.

Hayes

Karamichas

(2011) Olympic Games, Mega-Events and Civil Societies: Globalization, Environment, Resistance, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

75.

Hayward

(2013) Rethinking resilience: Reflections on the earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, 2010 and 2011. Ecology and Society 18(4): 37–42.

76.

Hayward

(2014) Reimaging and rebuilding local democracy. In: Bennett

Dann

Johnson

et al. (eds) Once in a Lifetime: City-Building After Disaster in Christchurch, Christchurch: Freerange Press, pp. 179–185.

77.

Healey

(1992) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. The Town Planning Review 63(2): 143–162.

78.

Healey

(1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A 30(9): 1531–1546.

79.

Healey

(2004) The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(1): 45–67.

80.

Healey

(2006a) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

81.

Healey

(2006b) Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times, London: Routledge.

82.

Healey P, de Magalhaes C, Madanipour A, et al. (1999) Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Regenerating City Centres. Full Report Research, Activities and Results. Newcastle‐Upon‐Tyne: Centre for Research in European Urban Environments, University of Newcastle.

83.

Healey P, De Magalhaes C, Madanipour A, et al. (2002) Shaping City Centre Futures: Conservation, Regeneration and Institutional CAPACITY. Regeneration in Grainger Town, Newcastle. Newcastle‐Upon‐Tyne: Centre for Research in European Urban Environments, University of Newcastle.

84.

Hoy

(1986) Power, repression, progress: Foucault, Lukes and the Frankfurt school. In: Hoy

(ed.) Foucault: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 123–147.

85.

Hoyt

(2006) Importing ideas: The transnational transfer of urban revitalization policy. International Journal of Public Administration 29(1): 221–243.

86.

HPA (2013) Save Hagley Park: Public meeting this Wednesday 23 January 2013. Available at: www.historicplacesaotearoa.org.nz/save-hagely-park-public-meeting-this-wednesday-23-january-2013/#more-2966 (accessed 6 April 2015).

87.

Hutanuwatr

Bolin

Pijawka

(2013) Vulnerability and disaster in Thailand: Scale, power, and collaboration in post-tsunami recovery. In: Pfeifer

Pfeifer

(eds) Forces of Nature and Cultural Responses, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 69–92.

88.

IConIC (2011) Interests in Conserving the Identity of Christchurch (IConIC) (Press release), Christchurch: IConIC.

89.

IConIC (2014) Interests In Conserving the Identity of Christchurch (IConIC). Available at: www.iconicchristchurch.weebly.com/ (accessed 7 May 2014).

90.

Johnson

(2011) The Neoliberal Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, Late Capitalism, and the Remaking of New Orleans, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

91.

Johnson

Osborne

(2003) Local strategic partnerships, neighbourhood renewal, and the limits to co-governance. Public Money and Management 23(3): 147–154.

92.

Johnson

Mamula-Seadon

(2014) Transforming governance: How national policies and organizations for managing disaster recovery evolved following the 4 September 2010 and 22 February 2011 Canterbury earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 30(1): 577–605.

93.

Johnson

Olshansky

(2010) Clear as Mud: Planning for the Rebuilding of New Orleans, Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.

94.

Johnson

Olshansky

(2013) The road to recovery: Governing post-disaster reconstruction. Land Lines 25(3): 14–21.

95.

Jones

Evans

(2013) Urban Regeneration in the UK: Boom, Bust and Recovery, 2nd ed. London: Sage.

96.

Keil

(2009) The urban politics of roll-with-it neoliberalization. City 13(2–3): 230–245.

97.

Klein

(2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, New York: Metropolitan Books.

98.

Larsen

Calgaro

Thomalla

(2011) Governing resilience building in Thailand's tourism-dependent coastal communities: Conceptualising stakeholder agency in social–ecological systems. Global Environmental Change 21(2): 481–491.

99.

Lascoumes

Le Gales

(2007) Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments – From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance 20(1): 1–21.

100.

Le Gales

(2011) Policy instruments and governance. In: Bevir

(ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Governance, London: Sage, pp. 142–159.

101.

Lewis

Murphy

(2015) Anchor organisations in Auckland: Rolling constructively with neoliberalism? Local Economy 30(1): 98–118.

102.

Airriess

Leong

et al. (2010) Vietnamese Americans in New Orleans East: From Vietnamese village to Asian quarter? In: Rivera

Miller

(eds) How Ethnically Marginalized Americans Cope with Catastrophic Disasters: Studies in Suffering and Resiliency, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, pp. 109–119.

103.

Lukes

(2005) Power: A Radical View, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

104.

Lukes S (2006) Questions about power: Lessons from the Louisiana Hurricane. Available at: www.understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Lukes/ (accessed 7 March 2017).

105.

Macfie

(2013) Report from Christchurch, Auckland: Bridget Williams Books.

106.

MacLeod

(2013) New urbanism/smart growth in the Scottish Highlands: Mobile policies and post-politics in local development planning. Urban Studies 50(11): 2196–2221.

107.

Mamula-Seadon

(2014) Earthquake disaster recovery: Leadership and governance. In: Beer

Kougioumtzoglou

Patelli

et al. (eds) Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. (Living Reference Work Entry), Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 1–14.

108.

Migone P (2011) Greens would levy to rebuild Christchurch. Dominion Post, 10 November. Available at: www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/politics/election-2011/5943193/Greens-would-levy-to-rebuild-Christchurch (accessed 24 February 2017).

109.

Miles

(2016) The Christchurch Fiasco: The Insurance Aftershock, 2nd ed. West Melton: Labyrinth Publishing.

110.

Nel

(2015) Evolving regional and local economic development in New Zealand. Local Economy 30(1): 67–77.

111.

New Zealand Parliament (2010) Canterbury earthquake response and recovery bill – Second reading, in Committee, Third Reading. Hansard 666: 13934.

112.

Nicholls P (2017) Christchurch quake map. Available at: www.christchurchquakemap.co.nz/all (accessed 22 February 2017).

113.

Olesen

(2014) The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning. Planning Theory 13(3): 288–303.

114.

Oliver

(2014) Developing the arts ecology of Christchurch. In: Bennett

Dann

Johnson

et al. (eds) Once in a Lifetime: City-Building After Disaster in Christchurch, Christchurch: Freerange Press, pp. 346–351.

115.

Olshansky

Hopkins

Johnson

(2012) Disaster and recovery: Processes compressed in time. Natural Hazards Review 13(3): 173–178.

116.

Ozcevik

Turk

Tas

et al. (2009) Flagship regeneration project as a tool for post-disaster recovery planning: The Zeytinburnu case. Disasters 33(2): 180–202.

117.

Parry

Morris

(1974) When is a decision not a decision? In: Crewe

(ed.) British Political Sociology Yearbook, London: Croom Helm, pp. 19–36.

118.

Peck

Tickell

(2002) Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34(3): 380–380.

119.

Pelling

(2003) The Vulnerability of Cities: Natural Disasters and Social Resilience, London: Earthscan.

120.

Pendlebury

(1999) The conservation of historic areas in the UK A case study of “Grainger Town”, Newcastle upon Tyne. Cities 16(6): 423–433.

121.

Pitzalis

(2015) La catastrofe come crisi organica ri-generativa Per un'analisi gramsciana del sisma di maggio 2012. Dada Rivista di Antropologia post-globale 5(2): 103–118.

122.

Porter

(2013) Whose urban renaissance? In: Porter

Shaw

(eds) Whose Urban Renaissance?: An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies, London: Routledge, pp. 241–252.

123.

Purcell

(2009) Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory 8(2): 140–165.

124.

Robinson N (2006) Learning from Lukes?: The three faces of power and the European Union. In: ECPR Joint Sessions Intercollege, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.

125.

Rypkema

(2003) The importance of downtown in the 21st century. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(1): 9–15.

126.

Schattschneider

(1960) The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America, New York: Rinehart and Winston.

127.

Searle

(2005) Power and planning consent in Sydney's urban consolidation program. In: Cryle

Hillier

(eds) Consent and Consensus. Politics, Media and Governance in Twentieth Century Australia, Perth: API Network, Australia Research Institute, pp. 297–317.

128.

Searle

(2009) Conflicts and politics in precinct development. In: Hayllar

Griffin

Edwards

(eds) City Spaces-Tourist Places: Urban Tourism Precincts, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 203–222.

129.

Simmons

Casper

(2012) Culpability, social triage, and structural violence in the aftermath of Katrina. Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 675–686.

130.

Smyth

(1994) Marketing the City: The Role of Flagship Projects in Urban Regeneration, London: E&F Spoon.

131.

Spirou

(2006) Cultural policy and urban restructuring in Chicago. In: Smith

(ed.) Tourism, Culture and Regeneration, Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 123–131.

132.

Spirou

(2010) Urban Tourism and Urban Change: Cities in a Global Economy, London: Routledge.

133.

Sutton

(2014) A blank canvas for new beginnings. In: Bennett

Dann

Johnson

et al. (eds) Once in a Lifetime: City-Building After Disaster in Christchurch, Christchurch: Freerange Press, pp. 52–58.

134.

The Press (2017) Too stressed to settle: 3000 insurance claims still waiting after Canterbury quakes. The Press, 7 February. Available at: www.stuff.co.nz/business/89149897/Too-stressed-to-settle-3000–insurance-claims-still-waiting-after-Canterbury-quakes (accessed 27 February 2017).

135.

Tiso

(2014) We weren't laughing: Disaster capitalism and the earthquake recovery in L'Aquila. In: Bennett

Dann

Johnson

et al. (eds) Once in a Lifetime: City-Building After Disaster in Christchurch, Christchurch: Freerange Press, pp. 271–275.

136.

Verderber

(2009) The un building of historic neighbourhoods in post-Katrina New Orleans. Journal of Urban Design 14(3): 257–277.

137.

Williams D (2011) Brownlee slams push by owners property lobby. The Press, 4 June, A.5.

138.

Wise

Harris

(2017) Sport, Events, Tourism and Regeneration, London: Routledge.

They never said ‘Come here and let's talk about it’: Exclusion and non-decision-making in the rebuild of Christchurch,New Zealand

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References