The City Region is becoming the spatial focus for economic development policy across many parts of the European continent. But these functional regions have taken on a new impetus in the UK with the introduction of ‘city deals’ aimed at improving network and coordination of actors in local authorities. One of the goals of city regions is to improve industrial policy particularly lacking since the abolition of many of the Regional Development Agencies across the UK. However, city regions in developing policy appear to be following in an unquestioning manner the industrial priorities of earlier institutions, and nowhere is this more obvious than in the case of the identification of priority industry development sectors. Too often the selection of industries and clusters for special support has been undertaken in an unquestioning manner. In this paper we focus on the case of the Cardiff Capital Region. We review approaches to identify priority sectors in this case and the problems associated with this policy approach.
BakhshiHDaviesJFreemanA, et al. (2015) The geography of the UK’s creative and high-tech economies report, London: NESTA.
4.
BaldwinJRBecksteadDMark BrownWRigbyDL (2008) Agglomeration and the geography of localization economies in Canada. Regional Studies42(1): 117–132.
5.
BeathJ (2002) UK industrial policy: Old tunes on new instruments?Oxford Review of Economic Policy18(2): 221–239.
6.
Berwert A and Mira L (2000) Cluster-Skizzen für die Bereiche Bau – Agro-Food – ICT: Vorabklärungen im Auftrag des Schweizerischen Wissenschafts- und Technologierates (SWTR)/Technologie- und Innovationspolitik (TIP). Bern: Schweizerischer Wissenschafts- und Technologierat (English Translation).
7.
BeynonMJCrawleyAMundayM (2016) Measuring and understanding the differences between urban and rural areas. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design43(6): 1136–1154.
8.
BrennerT (2001) Simulating the evolution of localised industrial clusters – An identification of the basic mechanisms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation4: 23–34.
9.
BruscoSRighiE (1989) Local government, industrial policy and social consensus: The case of Modena (Italy). Economy and Society18(4): 405–424.
10.
BryanJJonesCMundayM (2005) Investigating the potential of key sectors using multisectoral qualitative analysis: A Welsh case study. Environment and Planning C23(5): 633–656.
11.
BussF (1999) The case against targeted industry strategies. Economic Development Quarterly13(4): 339–356.
ChapainCCookePDe ProprisL, et al. (2010) Creative Clusters and Innovation. Putting Creativity on the Map, London: NESTA.
14.
CIT (2016) Available at: The V-LINC Tool www.cit.ie/vlinc (accessed 3August 2017).
15.
Crawley A (2014) A shopping list approach to regional development: A cautionary note on the application of smart specialisation. In: Sixty-first annual North American meetings of the regional science association international, Washington, DC, USA, 12–15 November 2014, North American Regional Science.
16.
CrawleyABeynonMMundayM (2013) Making location quotients more relevant as a policy aid in regional spatial analysis. Urban Studies50(9): 1854–1869.
17.
CrawleyAHillS (2011) Is industrial agglomeration increasing? New evidence from a small open economy. Journal of Economic Studies38(6): 725–740.
18.
CrawleyAPickernellD (2012) An appraisal of the European cluster observatory. European Urban and Regional Studies19(2): 207–211.
19.
DelgadoMPorterMSternS (2014) Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy43(10): 1785–1799.
20.
DTI (2001) Business Clusters in the UK – A First Assessment, London: Department of Trade & Industry.
21.
Fagerberg J and Srholec M (2017) Explaining regional economic performance: the role of competitiveness, specialization and capabilities. In: Robert Huggins and Piers Thompson (eds) Handbook of Regions and Competitiveness: Contemporary Theories and Perspectives on Economic Development, p. 117, Edward Elgar Publishing, London.
22.
FeserEJBergmanEM (2000) National industry templates: A framework for applied regional cluster analysis. Regional Studies34(1): 1–19.
23.
GagliardiLPercocoM (2017) The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions. Regional Studies51(6): 857–868.
24.
HaigRM (1926) Toward an understanding of the metropolis. Quarterly Journal of Economics40: 421–433.
25.
HeldJR (1996) Clusters as an economic development tool: Beyond the pitfalls. Economic Development Quarterly10(3): 249–261.
26.
HirschmanAO (1964) The paternity of an index. The American Economic Review54(5): 761.
27.
Hobbs J (2010) A framework for the analysis of spatial specialisations. PhD thesis, Cork Institute of Technology, Ireland.
28.
HolmesJRutherfordTFitzgibbonS (2005) Innovation in the automotive tool, die and mould industry: A case study of the Windsor-Essex region. In: WolfeDLucasM (eds) Global Networks and Local Linkages: The Paradox of Cluster Development in an Open Economy, Kingston: Queen’s School of Policy Studies Innovation Systems Research Series. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 119–154.
29.
HugginsR (1997) Regional competitive specialization. Development agency sector initiatives in Wales. Area29(3): 241–252.
KemenyTStorperM (2015) Is specialization good for regional economic development?Regional Studies49(6): 1003–1018.
32.
MidmorePMundayMRobertsA (2006) Assessing industry linkages using regional input-output tables. Regional Studies40(3): 329–343.
33.
Nadvi K (1995) Industrial Clusters and Networks: Case Studies of SME Growth and Innovation. United Nations Industrial Development Organization Report. UN. Geneva, Switzerland.
34.
NathanMOvermanH (2013) Agglomeration, clusters, and industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy29(2): 383–404.
35.
NottaN (1991) Trying to understand the ED official’s dilemma. In: KenyonDKincaidJ (eds) Competition Among Local and State Governments, Washington, DC: Urban Institute, pp. 247–250.
36.
PorterME (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review76(6): 77–90.
37.
ReesJLordA (2013) Making space: Putting politics back where it belongs in the construction of city regions in the North of England. Local Economy28(7–8): 679–695.
38.
ReidNSmithBCarrollM (2008) Cluster regions: A social network perspective. Economic Development Quarterly22(4): 345–352.
39.
Rodrik D (2004) Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4767. Publisher Centre of Economic Policy Research: London.
40.
SpringMHughesAMasonK, et al. (2017) Creating the competitive edge: A new relationship between operations management and industrial policy. Journal of Operations Management49: 6–19.
41.
TownsendAChampionT (2014) The impact of recession on city regions: The British experience, 2008–2013. Local Economy29(1–2): 38–51.
42.
van Egeraat, C, Morgenroth, E, Kroes, R, Curran, D, and Gleeson, J (2016) A measure for identifying substantial geographic concentrations. Papers in Regional Science, doi:10.1111/pirs.12241.
