This article considers a generalized leasing model for car use as a means of better reconciling profit seeking by car makers with environmental improvements, while supporting income generation and employment in the car business sector. It locates its contribution against the ‘extended producer responsibility’ framework, proposed by some as a basis for a corporate response to environmental and resource concerns. We show that within limits a reorganization of the business model informing the volume car market offers one part of a solution to problems of economic growth and climate change. The article progresses to consider obstacles to change and options for government policy.
AbernathyWJ (1978) The Productivity Dilemma. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
AbernathyWJClarkKBKantrowAM (1983) Industrial Renaissance. New York: Basic Books.
3.
AltshulerAAndersonMJonesD (1984) The Future of the Automobile. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BaileyDde RuyterA (2012) Re-examining the BMW-Rover affair: A case study of corporate, strategic and government failure. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management12(2): 117–136.
5.
BannockG (1973) The Juggernauts: The Age of the Big Corporation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
BerkeleyNJarvisDBegleyJ (2010) Phoenix from the ashes: Can low carbon vehicles ensure the long-term viability of the West Midlands Automotive Cluster?International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management12(2): 117–136.
8.
CeschinFVezzoliC (2010) The role of public policy in stimulating radical environmental impact reduction in the automotive sector: The need to focus on Product-Service System innovation. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management10(2/3): 321–341.
9.
ChandlerAD (1962) Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
CoffeyD (2006) The Myth of Japanese Efficiency: The World Car Industry in a Globalising Age. Cheltenham; New York: Edward Elgar.
11.
Freyssenet M and Jetin B (2009) Big Three: Le Piège de la ‘Libéralisation’ Salariale et Financière se Referme. La Lettre de GERPISA, January–March.
12.
HammondTH(1994) Structure, strategy and the agenda of the firm. In: RumeltR (ed.) Fundamental Issues in Strategy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 94–154.
HarperGWellsP (2012) Diverse regional sustainability strategies: Template for the future or squandered resources?International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management12(2): 153–171.
15.
HawkenPLovinsABHunter-LovinsL (1999) Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution. London: Earthscan.
16.
JullienB (2002) Consumers vs. manufacturer or consumer vs. consumer: The implications of a usage analysis of automobile systems. Competition and Change6(1): 113–125.
17.
Jullien B and Pardi T (2012) In the name of consumer: The social construction of innovation in the European automobile industry and its practical consequences. European Review of Industrial Economics and Policy (ERIEP) 3. Available at: http://revel.unice.fr/eriep/index.html?id=3338 (accessed 9 July 2012).
18.
MacNeillSBaileyD (2010) Changing policies for the automotive industry in an ‘old’ industrial region: An open innovation model for the UK West Midlands?International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management10(2/3): 128–144.
19.
MicheliniRC (2008) Knowledge Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Growth. New York: Nova Science.
20.
PineBJ (1999) Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
PioreMJSabelCF (1984) The Second Industrial Divide: Policies for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
22.
RhysDG (2005) Competition in the auto sector: The impact of the interface between supply and demand. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management5(3): 261–283.
23.
SmithMCrottyJ (2006) Strategic responses to environmental regulation and the UK automotive sector: The European Union End-of-Life Vehicle Directive and the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Industrial Ecology10(4): 95–111.
SperlingDGordonD (2009) Two Billion Cars: Driving Towards Sustainability. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
StahelWR (1997) The Functional Economy: Cultural and Organizational Change, from the Industrial Green Game: Implications for Environmental Design and Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27.
TiroleJ (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
WellsP (2010a) Sustainability and diversity in the global automotive industry. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management10(2/3): 305–320.
29.
WellsP (2010b) The Tata Nano, the global ‘value’ segment, and the implications for the traditional automotive industry regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society3(3): 443–457.
