Does the local economic performance league table lie? Concentric banding and the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010

Abstract

This article seeks to provide evidence on whether ‘league table’ orderings for the economic performance of local areas are robust to the use of spatial units other than the Local Authority. We concentrate primarily on the overall index from the recently published Index of Multiple Deprivation for England. In addition to compiling league tables for administrative Local Authority areas and functional Travel-To-Work Areas, we also develop a concentric banding approach which allows a range of definitions for any local area. Our results demonstrate that local economic performance league table standings can exhibit marked sensitivity to the adopted definition of local area. We offer some particular focus on the case of Hull, but also demonstrate that this is not a unique example.

Keywords

aggregation areal unit index of multiple deprivation league table mapping spatial unit

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Briant

Combes

P-P

Lafourcade

(2010) Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? Journal of Urban Economics 67(3): 287–302.

Centre for Cities (2010) Cities Outlook 2010. London: Centre for Cities. Available at: http://www.centreforcities.org/assets/files/10-01-15%20Cities%20Outlook%202010.pdf (accessed 8 February 2012).

Centre for Cities (2011) Cities Outlook 2011. London: Centre for Cities. Available at: http://www.centreforcities.org/assets/files/Cities%20Outlook%202011/CITIES%20OUTLOOK_2011.pdf (accessed 8 February 2012).

Coombes

Bond

(2007) Travel-to-Work Areas: The 2007 Review. London: Office for National Statistics.

Cörvers

Hensen

Bongaerts

(2009) Delimitation and coherence of functional and administrative regions. Regional Studies 43(1): 19–31.

Department for Communities and Local Government (2010) Primary Urban Areas and Travel to Work Area Indicators: Updating the Evidence Base on Cities. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/statistics/doc/1542235.doc (accessed 12 May 2011).

Department for Communities and Local Government (2011) The English Indices of Deprivation 2010. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/statistics/pdf/1871208.pdf (accessed 12 May 2011).

Huby

Cinderby

White

(2009) Measuring inequality in rural England: The effects of changing spatial resolution. Environment and Planning A 41(12): 3023–3037.

Jones

(2000) The estimation of rates of unemployment for small spatial units. Local Economy 15(2): 144–158.

10.

McLennan D, Barnes H, Noble M, et al. (2011) The English Indices of Deprivation 2010: Technical Report. London: DCLG. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/statistics/pdf/1870718.pdf (accessed 12 May 2011).

11.

Office for National Statistics (2001) Census 2001. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/census-2001/index.html (accessed 8 February 2012).

12.

Openshaw S (1984) The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Norwich: Geo Books. Available at: http://qmrg.org.uk/files/2008/11/38-maup-openshaw.pdf (accessed 8 February 2012).

13.

Parkinson

Hutchins

Champion

(2005) State of the Cities: A Progress Report. London: HMSO.

14.

Smith

Noble

Avenell

(2010) Technical Feasibility for Improving the State of the Cities Database. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.