The article sets out a two-dimensional regional typology combining measures of migration and visiting rates. It argues that forms of mobility are interrelated but that the relationship varies by broad type of region and it argues for a place-based approach in managing the interaction of mobility across Europe. Such an approach would require a territorial assessment of both the different dimensions of mobility in specific localities and the conceptualisation of a mobility carrying capacity for localities.
BauerTZimmermannKF (1999) Assessment of Possible Migration Pressure and its Labour Market Impact Following EU Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe. London: Department for Education and Employment.
3.
BensonMO'ReillyK (2009) Migration and the search for a better way of life: A critical exploration of lifestyle migration. Sociological Review57(4): 608–625.
4.
CastlesS (2000) International migration at the beginning of the twenty-first century: Global trends and issues. International Social Science Journal52(165): 269–281.
5.
ChristofakisM (2010) Strategic options for tourism impacts on local sustainability: A conceptual approach. Local Economy25(7): 586–598.
6.
CoombesMChampionTRaybouldS (2007) Did the early A8 in-migrants to England go to areas of labour shortage?Local Economy22(4): 335–348.
7.
DaskalopoulouIPetrouA (2009) Urban tourism competitiveness: Networks and the regional asset base. Urban Studies46(4): 779–801.
8.
ESDP (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
9.
European Commission (2001) Enlarging Solidarity, Uniting Europe. Second report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
10.
European Commission (2004) A New Partnership for Cohesion Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation. Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
11.
European Commission (2007) Growing Regions, Growing Europe. Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Brussels: Directorate General Regional Policy.
12.
European Commission (2008a) Geographic Mobility in the European Union: Optimising its Economic and Social Benefits. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
13.
European Commission (2008b) Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength. Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
14.
European Commission (2008c) Regional Focus No. 2. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
15.
European Commission (2010a) Europe 2020: AStrategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. COM(2010) 2020 final. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
16.
European Commission (2010b) Investing in Europe's Future. Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Brussels: Directorate General Regional Policy.
FloridaR (2000) Competing in the Age of Talent: Quality of Place in the New Economy. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
19.
FotheringhamASReesPChampionTKalogorouAR (2004) The development of migration model for England and Wales: Overview and modelling out-migration. Environment and Planning A361633–1672.
20.
GreenAE (2007) Local action on labour market integration of new arrivals: Issues and dilemmas for policy. Local Economy22(4): 349–361.
21.
KingRWarnesAMWilliamsAM (1998) International retirement migration in Europe. International Journal of Population Geography4(2): 91–111.
22.
LewAA (1987) A framework of tourist attraction research. Annals of Tourism Research14(4): 553–575.
23.
MellanderCFloridaRStolarickK (2011) Here to stay: The effects of community satisfaction on the decision to stay. Spatial Economic Analysis6(1): 5–24.
24.
NiedomyslT (2008) Residential preferences forinterregional migration in Sweden: Demographic, socioeconomic and geographical determinants. Environment and Planning A401109–1131.
25.
PlaneDA (1993) Demographic influences on migration. Regional Studies27(4): 375–383.
26.
RodriguezR (2001) Tourism as a recruiting post for retirement migration. Tourism Geographies3(1): 52–63.
27.
ShellerMUrryJ (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A38207–226.
28.
StenningAChampionTConwayC (2006) Assessing the Local and Regional Impacts of International Migration. CURDS Report for DCLG. Newcastle: CURDS.
29.
SyrettSLyonsM (2007) Migration, new arrivals and local economies. Local Economy22(4): 325–334.
30.
TripJJ (2007) Assessing quality of place: A comparative analysis of Amsterdam and Rotterdam. Journal of Urban Affairs29(5): 501–517.
31.
WilliamsAMHallCM(2002) Tourism, migration, circulation and mobility: The contingencies of time and place In: HallCMWilliamsAM (eds) Tourism and Migration: New Relationships between Production and Consumption. Dordrecht; London: Kluwer Academic, 1–52.
