Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-5
Social exchange or reinforcement of women’s educational advantage? The influence of educational assortative mating on occupational assortative mating for couples in Spain
The reversal of the gender gap in education has transformed traditional patterns of assortative mating, increasing the number of hypogamous couples. This change has been particularly intense in the case of Spain, a country of great interest due to the ambivalence of strong support for egalitarian attitudes and high proportion of traditional couples. Using quarterly microdata from the Spanish Labour Force Survey, applying generalised ordered-logit models, this research reveals that educational hypogamy increases the probability of occupational hypogamy. This association is consistent with the use of different occupational classifications and levels of disaggregation. But there are some factors that limit the transmission of women’s educational advantages to their occupational levels, mainly gender differences in access to the labour market and an uneven distribution of professional achievements by sex. The findings obtained underline the relevance of using different measures as well as different theoretical approaches to explain seemingly contradictory couple equilibria.
BegallKMillsM (2013) The influence of educational field, occupation, and occupational sex segregation on fertility in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review29(4): 720–742.
2.
BertrandMEmirKPanJ (2015) Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics130(2): 571–614.
3.
BlossfeldHP (2009) Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology35: 513–530.
4.
BoertienDPermanyerI (2019) Educational assortative mating as a determinant of changing household income inequality: A 21-country study. European Sociological Review35(4): 522–537.
5.
BreenRSalazarL (2011) Educational assortative mating and earnings inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology117(3): 808–843.
6.
ChristophBMatthesBEbnerC (2020) Occupation-based measures. An overview and discussion. Köln Z Soziol72(1): 41–78.
7.
ChudnovskayaMKashyapR (2020) Is the end of educational hypergamy the end of status hypergamy? Evidence from Sweden. European Sociological Review36(3): 351–365.
8.
Domínguez-FolguerasMJurado-GuerreroTBotía-MorillasC (2018) Against the odds? Keeping a non-traditional division of domestic work after first parenthood in Spain. Journal of Family Issues39(7): 1855–1879.
9.
DrobničSGuillénA (2011) Work-Life Balance in Europe: The Role of Job Quality. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
EnglandP (2010) The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society24(2): 149–166.
11.
Esping-AndersenGBillariF (2015) Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review41(1): 1–31.
12.
Esping-AndersenGBoertienDBonkeJ, et al. (2013) Couple specialization in multiple equilibria. European Sociological Review29(6): 1280–1294.
13.
EsteveASchwartzCVan BavelJ, et al. (2016) The end of hypergamy: Global trends and implications. Population and Development Review42(4): 615–625.
14.
GanglMZiefleA (2009) Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography46(2): 341–369.
15.
GanzeboomHDe GraafPTreimanD (1992) A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research21: 1–56.
16.
García RománJ (2020) The division of gender roles in female breadwinner couples in the United States and Spain. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas170: 73–94.
17.
García RománJ (2021) Couples’ relative education and division of domestic work in France, Spain and the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies52(2): 245–270.
18.
GarridoLRodríguezJ (2011) Estructura ocupacional y carencias formativas en las empresas. Madrid: Forem.
19.
Gonalons-PonsPGanglM (2021) Marriage and masculinity: Male breadwinner culture, unemployment, and separation risk in 29 countries. American Sociological Review86(3): 465–502.
20.
Gonalons-PonsPSchwartzC (2017) Trends in economic homogamy: Changes in assortative mating or the division of paid labor in marriage?Demography54(3): 985–1005.
21.
GrowAVan BavelJ (2015) Assortative mating and the reversal of gender inequality in education in Europe: An agent-based model. PLoS ONE10(6): e0127806.
22.
GullicksonAKangV (2010) Comment: An endorsement of exchange theory in mate selection. American Journal of Sociology115(4): 1243–1251.
23.
HanSQianY (2021) Concentration and dispersion: School-to-work linkages and their impact on occupational assortative mating. The Social Science Journal. Epub ahead of print 12 January. DOI: 10.1080/03623319.2020.1851560.
24.
HarknessS (2013) Women’s employment and household income inequality. In: GornickJJänttiM (eds) Income Inequality: Economic Disparities and the Middle Class in Affluent Countries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp.207–233.
25.
HimmelweitSSantosCSevillaA, et al. (2013) Sharing of resources within the family and the economics of household decision making. Journal of Marriage and Family75(3): 625–639.
26.
IbáñezMGarcía-MingoE (2021) Mapping gendered social closure mechanisms through examination of seven male-dominated occupations. Gender, Work and Organization29(5): 1617–1637.
27.
KahnJGarcía-ManglanoJBianchiS (2014) The motherhood penalty at midlife: Long-term effects of children on women’s careers. Journal of Marriage and Family76(1): 56–72.
28.
KalmijnM (2010) Educational inequality, homogamy, and status exchange in black-white intermarriage: A comment on Rosenfeld. American Journal of Sociology115(4): 1252–1263.
29.
KeeleLStevensonRElwertF (2020) The causal interpretation of estimated associations in regression models. Political Science Research and Methods8(1): 1–13.
30.
KhamisNAyusoL (2022) Female breadwinner: More egalitarian couples? An international comparison. Journal of Family and Economic Issues43: 534–545.
31.
KlesmentMVan BavelJ (2017) The reversal of the gender gap in education, motherhood, and women as main earners in Europe. European Sociological Review33(3): 465–481.
32.
MansourHMcKinnishT (2018) Same-occupation spouses: Preferences or search costs?Journal of Population Economics31(4): 1005–1033.
33.
McClintockE (2020) Occupational sex composition and marriage: The romantic cost of gender-atypical jobs. Journal of Marriage and Family82: 911–933.
34.
MeronMHolýDErhartovaJ, et al. (2014) ESSnet ESeG Final Report (Delivery nº DG75-F001, July). Paris: INSEE, Direction des Statistiques Démographiques et Sociales ESSnet project. Available at: https://circabc.europa.eu/
35.
MertonR (1941) Intermarriage and the social structure: Fact and theory. Psychiatry4(3): 361–374.
36.
MoodC (2010) Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what can we do about it. European Sociological Review26: 67–82.
37.
Moreno-MínguezAOrtegaMGamero-BurónC (2017) The family models in Spain: Thinking on the family ambivalence from a theoretical perspective. Revista Española de Sociología26(2): 149–167.
38.
Ortiz-GervasiL (2021) The advantage of daughters in hypogamous families: Parental heterogamy and educational outcomes among children of highly educated parents. European Societies23(5): 644–674.
39.
PollakR (2003) Gary Becker’s contributions to family and household economics. Review of Economics of the Household1: 111–141.
40.
QianY (2017) Gender asymmetry in educational and income assortative marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family79(2): 318–336.
41.
SchwartzCWangYMareR (2021) Opportunity and change in occupational assortative mating. Social Science Research99: 102600.
42.
SchwartzCZhenZXieY (2016) Marrying up by marrying down: Status exchange between social origin and education in the United States. Sociological Science3: 1003–1027.
43.
ThébaudS (2010) Masculinity, bargaining, and breadwinning: Understanding men’s housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender & Society24(3): 330–354.
44.
TijdensK (2016) ESEG-2014 coding scheme + explanatory note. Deliverable 8.13 of the SERISS project, Report no. 654221, November. Amsterdam: European Commission. Available at: www.seriss.eu/resources/deliverables
45.
ToftMJarnessM (2020) Upper-class romance: Homogamy at the apex of the class structure. European Societies23(1): 71–97.
46.
Van BavelJ (2012) The reversal of gender inequality in education, union formation and fertility in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research10: 127–154.
47.
Van BavelJSchwartzCEsteveA (2018) The reversal of the gender gap in education and its consequences for family life. Annual Review of Sociology44: 341–360.
WilliamsR (2006) Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal6(1): 58–82.
50.
WiseRZanggerC (2017) Educational homogamy and inter-couple income inequality: Linking demographic and socio-economic consequences of educational expansion in Germany and Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Sociology43(3): 587–610.
51.
YavorskyEKeisterAQianY, et al. (2019) Women in the one percent: Gender dynamics in top income positions. American Sociological Review84(1): 54–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
