The reversal of the gender gap in education has potentially far-reaching consequences for marriage markets, family formation, and relationship outcomes. One possible consequence is the growing number of marriages in which wives have more education than their husbands. Past research shows that this type of union is at higher risk of dissolution. Using data on marriages formed between 1950 and 2004 in the United States, we evaluate whether this association has persisted as the prevalence of this relationship type has increased. Our results show a large shift in the association between spouses’ relative education and marital dissolution. Specifically, marriages in which wives have the educational advantage were once more likely to dissolve, but this association has disappeared in more recent marriage cohorts. Another key finding is that the relative stability of marriages between educational equals has increased. These results are consistent with a shift away from rigid gender specialization toward more flexible, egalitarian partnerships, and they provide an important counterpoint to claims that progress toward gender equality in heterosexual relationships has stalled.
Alvira-HammondMartaLongmoreMonica A.ManningWendy D.GiordanoPeggy C.2013. “Gainful Activity and Intimate Partner Violence in Emerging Adulthood.” 2013 Working Paper Series, Bowling Green State University, The Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green, OH.
2.
AtkinsonMaxine P.GreensteinTheodore N.LangMolly Mohahan. 2005. “For Women, Breadwinning Can be Dangerous: Gendered Resource Theory and Wife Abuse.” Journal of Marriage and Family67(5):1137–48.
BeckerGary S.1974. “A Theory of Marriage.” Pp. 299–344 in Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital, edited by SchultzT. W.Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research by the University of Chicago Press.
5.
BertrandMarianneKamenicaEmirPanJessica. 2013. “Gender Identity and Relative Income within Households.” Chicago Booth Paper No. 13–08, University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL.
6.
BianchiSuzanne M.MilkieMelissa A.SayerLiana C.RobinsonJohn P.2000. “Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor.” Social Forces79(1):191–228.
7.
BianchiSuzanne M.RobinsonJohn P.MilkieMelissa A.2006. Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
BlauFrancine D.BrintonMary C.GruskyDavid B.2006. “The Declining Significance of Gender?” Pp. 3–34 in The Declining Significance of Gender?, edited by BlauF. D.BrintonM. C.GruskyD. B.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
BlauFrancine D.BrummundPeterLiuAlberto Y-H.2013. “Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational Coding System.” Demography50(2):471–92.
10.
BreinesWini. 1986. “The 1950s: Gender and Some Social Science.” Sociological Inquiry56(1):69–92.
11.
BuchmannClaudiaDiPreteThomas A.2006. “The Growing Female Advantage in College Completion: The Role of Family Background and Academic Achievement.” American Sociological Review71:515–41.
12.
BumpassLarry L.MartinTeresa CastroSweetJames A.1991. “The Impact of Family Background and Early Marital Factors on Marital Disruption.” Journal of Family Issues12(1):22–42.
13.
BumpassLarryRaleyKelly. 2007. “Measuring Separation and Divorce.” Pp. 125–43 in Handbook of Measurment Issues in Family Research, edited by HofferthS. L.CasperL. M.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
BussDavid M.ShackelfordTodd K.KirkpatrickLee A.LarsenRandy J.2001. “A Half Century of Mate Preferences: The Cultural Evolution of Values.” Journal of Marriage and Family63(2):491–503.
15.
CasterlineJohn B.2001. Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition: Selected Perspectives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16.
CharlesKerwin KofiLuohMing-Ching. 2003. “Gender Differences in Completed Schooling.” Review of Economics and Statistics85(3):559–77.
17.
CherlinAndrew J.1990. “A Review: The Strange Career of the ‘Harvard-Yale Study.’”Public Opinion Quarterly54(1):117–24.
18.
CherlinAndrew J.2004. “The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and Family66(4):848–61.
19.
ClelandJohn. 2001. “Potatoes and Pills: An Overview of Innovation-Diffusion Contributions to Explanations of Fertility Decline.” Pp. 39–65 in Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition, edited by CasterlineJ. B.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20.
CoontzStephanie. 2005. Marriage, A History: From Obedience to Intimacy or How Love Conquered Marriage. New York: Viking.
21.
CotterDavid A.HermsenJoan M.VannemanReeve. 2004. Gender Inequality at Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
CotterDavid A.HermsenJoan M.VannemanReeve. 2011. “The End of the Gender Revolution? Gender Role Attitudes from 1977 to 2008.” American Journal of Sociology117(1):259–89.
23.
DiPreteThomas A.BuchmannClaudia. 2006. “Gender-Specific Trends in the Value of Education and the Emerging Gender Gap in College Completion.” Demography43(1):1–24.
24.
DuncanGreg J.2008. “When to Promote, and When to Avoid, a Population Perspective.” Demography45(4):763–84.
25.
EnglandPaula. 2006. “Toward Gender Equality: Progress and Bottlenecks.” Pp. 245–64 in The Declining Significance of Gender?, edited by BlauF. D.BrintonM. C.GruskyD. B.New York: Russell Sage.
26.
EnglandPaula. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.” Gender & Society24(2):149–66.
27.
EsteveAlbertGarcía-RománJoanPermanyerIñaki. 2012. “The Gender-Gap Reversal in Education and Its Effect on Union Formation: The End of Hypergamy?” Population and Development Review38(3):535–46.
28.
FismanRaymondIyengarSheena S.KamenicaEmirSimonsonItamar. 2006. “Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence from a Speed Dating Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics121(2):673–97.
29.
GersonKathleen. 2010. The Unfinished Revolution: How a New Generation Is Reshaping Family, Work, and Gender in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
GoldinClaudia. 2006. “The Quiet Revolution that Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family.” American Economic Review96(2):1–21.
31.
GoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence F.KuziemkoIlyana. 2006. “The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap.” Journal of Economic Perspectives20(4):133–56.
32.
GoldscheiderFrances K.WaiteLinda J.1991. New Families, No Families? The Transformation of the American Home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
GoldsteinJoshua R.HarknettKristen. 2006. “Parenting across Racial and Class Lines: Assortative Mating Patterns of New Parents Who Are Married, Cohabiting, Dating and No Longer Romantically Involved.” Social Forces85(1):121–43.
34.
GoldsteinJoshua R.KenneyCatherine T.2001. “Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort Forecasts of First Marriage for U.S. Women.” American Sociological Review66(4):506–519.
35.
GoodeWilliam J.[1963] 1970. World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: Free Press.
36.
GouskovaElenaHerringaSteven G.McGonagleKatherineSchoeniRobert F.2008. “Technical Report: Panel Study of Income Dynamics, Revised Longitudinal Weights 1993–2005.” Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
37.
HeatonTim B.2002. “Factors Contributing to Increasing Marital Stability in the United States.” Journal of Family Issues23(3):392–409.
38.
HeckertD. AlexNowakThomas C.SnyderKay A.1998. “The Impact of Husbands’ and Wives’ Relative Earnings on Marital Disruption.” Journal of Marriage and the Family60(3):690–703.
39.
HitschGünter J.HortaçsuAliArielyDan. 2010. “Matching and Sorting in Online Dating.” American Economic Review100(1):130–63.
40.
HochschildArlie R.1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.
41.
JohnsonWilliam R.SkinnerJonathan. 1986. “Labor Supply and Marital Separation.” American Economic Review76(3):455–69.
42.
KalmijnMatthijs. 2003. “Union Disruption in the Netherlands: Opposing Influences of Task Specialization and Assortative Mating?” International Journal of Sociology33(2):36–64.
43.
KaufmanGayle. 2000. “Do Gender Role Attitudes Matter? Family Formation and Dissolution among Traditional and Egalitarian Men and Women.” Journal of Family Issues21(1):128–44.
44.
KaukinenCatherine. 2004. “Status Compatibility, Physical Violence, and Emotional Abuse in Intimate Relationships.” Journal of Marriage and Family66(2):452–71.
45.
LiefbroerAart C.DourleijnEdith. 2006. “Unmarried Cohabitation and Union Stability: Testing the Role of Diffusion Using Data from 16 European Countries.” Demography43(2):203–221.
LyeDiane N.BiblarzTimothy J.1993. “The Effects of Attitudes toward Family Life and Gender Roles on Marital Satisfaction.” Journal of Family Issues14(2):157–88.
48.
ManningWendy D.CohenJessica A.2012. “Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Dissolution: An Examination of Recent Marriages.” Journal of Marriage and Family74(2):377–87.
49.
MartinElaine K.TaftCasey T.ResickPatricia A.2007. “A Review of Marital Rape.” Aggression and Violent Behavior12(3):329–47.
50.
MartinSteven P.2006. “Trends in Marital Dissolution by Women’s Education in the United States.” Demographic Research15(20):537–60.
51.
MasonMary AnnFineMark A.CarnochanSarah. 2001. “Family Law in the New Millennium: For Whose Families?” Journal of Family Issues22(7):859–81.
52.
MelzerScott A.2002. “Gender, Work, and Intimate Violence: Men’s Occupational Violence Spillover and Compensatory Violence.” Journal of Marriage and Family64(4):820–32.
53.
MunschChristin L.2010. “The Effect of Unemployment and Relative Income Disparity on Infidelity for Men and Women.” Presented at the American Sociological Association meetings, Atlanta, GA.
54.
NockSteven L.2001. “The Marriages of Equally Dependent Spouses.” Journal of Family Issues22(6):755–75.
55.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).2010. “CO3.1: Educational Attainment by Gender and Average Years Spent in Formal Education.” OECD Family Database. Paris: OECD (http://www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database). Updated January20, 2010.
56.
OppenheimerValerie Kincade. 1994. “Women’s Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial Societies.” Population and Development Review20(2):293–342.
57.
OppenheimerValerie Kincade. 1997. “Women’s Employment and the Gain to Marriage: The Specialization and Trading Model.” Annual Review of Sociology23:431–53.
58.
Panel Study of Income Dynamics, public use dataset. N.d. Produced and distributed by the Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu).
59.
ParsonsTalcott. 1949. “The Social Structures of the Family.” Pp. 173–201 in The Family: Its Function and Destiny, edited by AnshenR. N.New York: Harper.
60.
PhillipsJulie A.SweeneyMegan M.2006. “Can Differential Exposure to Risk Factors Explain Recent Racial and Ethnic Variation in Marital Disruption?” Social Science Research35(2):409–434.
61.
QianZhenchao. 1998. “Changes in Assortative Mating: The Impact of Age and Education, 1970–1990.” Demography35(3):279–92.
62.
RaleyR. KellyBumpassLarry. 2003. “The Topography of the Divorce Plateau: Levels and Trends in Union Stability in the United States after 1980.” Demographic Research8(8):246–58.
63.
RidgewayCecilia L.2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
RobertsSam. 2010. “More Men Marrying Wealthier Women.” New York Times, January19.
65.
SayerLiana C.2005. “Gender, Time and Inequality: Trends in Women’s and Men’s Paid Work, Unpaid Work and Free Time.” Social Forces84(1):285–303.
66.
SayerLiana C.BianchiSuzanne M.2000. “Women’s Economic Independence and the Probability of Divorce: A Review and Reexamination.” Journal of Family Issues21:906–943.
67.
SchwartzChristine R.2010. “Earnings Inequality and the Changing Association between Spouses’ Earnings.” American Journal of Sociology115(5):1524–57.
68.
SchwartzChristine R.MareRobert D.2005. “Trends in Educational Assortative Marriage from 1940 to 2003.” Demography42(4):621–46.
69.
SouthScott J.2001. “Time-Dependent Effects of Wives’ Employment on Marital Dissolution.” American Sociological Review66(2):226–45.
70.
StaceyJudith. 1998. Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late-Twentieth-Century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
71.
SweeneyMegan M.2002. “Two Decades of Family Change: The Shifting Economic Foundations of Marriage.” American Sociological Review67(1):132–47.
72.
TeachmanJay D.2002. “Stability across Cohorts in Divorce Risk Factors.” Demography39(2):331–51.
73.
ThalerRichard H.2013. “Breadwinning Wives and Nervous Husbands.” New York Times, June1.
74.
TichenorVeronica Jaris. 1999. “Status and Income as Gendered Resources: The Case of Marital Power.” Journal of Marriage and the Family61(3):638–50.
75.
TichenorVeronica Jaris. 2005. Earning More and Getting Less. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
76.
TierneyJohn. 2006. “Male Pride and Female Prejudice.” New York Times, January3.
77.
TzengMeei-Shenn. 1992. “The Effects of Socioeconomic Heterogamy and Changes on Marital Dissolution for First Marriages.” Journal of Marriage and the Family54(3):609–619.
78.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2002 and 2006–2010. National Center for Health Statistics. National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle VI, 2002 and 2006-2010 [Computer files] (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg.htm).
79.
WeissYoramWillisRobert J.1997. “Match Quality, New Information, and Marital Dissolution.” Journal of Labor Economics15(1):S293–S329.
80.
WillingerBeth. 1993. “Resistance and Change: College Men’s Attitudes toward Family and Work in the 1980s.” Pp. 108–130 in Men, Work, and Family, edited by HoodJ. C.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
81.
ZengYiMorganS. PhilipWangZhenglianGuDananYangChingli. 2012. “A Multistate Life Table Analysis of Union Regimes in the United States: Trends and Racial Differentials, 1970–2002.” Population Research and Policy Review31(2):207–234.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
