This study challenges the orthodox concept of mate selection. Existing research presupposes the binary conceptualization of ‘arranged marriage versus love marriage,’ which is too limited in scope to grasp the reality of transition in mate selection. An alternative model is proposed in this study and is applied to data from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Analyses suggest that a considerable number of cases cannot be described as either ‘traditional’ or ‘love’ marriages; these are considered transitional cases. In some cases, the couple’s first meeting is initiated by free will but with strong parental intervention regarding the decision to marry. In other cases, the first meeting is arranged by parents or kin, but the couple maintains free will. Three countries share basic trends regarding the shift between the types of mate selection, and an analysis shows that national differences regarding certain factors also explain the shift.
BloodRO (1967) Arranged Match and Love Marriage: A Tokyo–Detroit Comparison. New York: Free Press.
2.
BlossfeldH-P (2009) Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology35(1): 513–530.
3.
BrintonMC (2001) Married women’s labor in East Asian economics. In: BrintonMC (ed.) Women’s Working Lives in East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–37.
4.
BrintonMLeeY-JParishWL (1995) Married women’s employment in rapidly industrializing societies: Examples from East Asia. American Journal of Sociology100(5): 1099–1130.
5.
BrintonMCLeeY-JParishW (2001) Married women’s employment in rapidly industrializing societies: South Korea and Taiwan. In: BrintonMC (ed.) Women’s Working Lives in East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 38–66.
6.
BusDMShackelfordTKKirkpatrickLALarsenRJ (2001) A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family63(2): 491–503.
7.
ChangK-S (1999) Compressed modernity and its discontents: South Korean society in transition. Economy and Society28(1): 30–55.
8.
ChangK-SSongM-Y (2010) The stranded individualizer under compressed modernity: South Korean women in individualization without individualism. British Journal of Sociology61(3): 539–564.
9.
CharsleyKShawA (2006) South Asian transnational marriages in comparative perspective. Global Networks6(4): 331–344.
10.
CorwinLA (1977) Caste, class and the love-marriage: Social change in India. Journal of Marriage and Family39(4): 823–831.
11.
FoxGL (1975) Love match and arranged marriage in a modernizing nation: Mate selection in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Marriage and Family37(1): 180–193.
12.
FrickeTEChangJ-SYangL-S (1994) Historical and ethnographical perspectives on the Chinese family. In: ThorntonALinH-S (eds) Social Change and the Family in Taiwan. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 22–48.
13.
GhimireDJAxinnWGYabikuSTThorntonA (2006) Social change, premarital nonfamily experience, and spouse choice in an arranged marriage society. American Journal of Sociology111(4): 1181–1218.
14.
GopalkrishnanNBabacanH (2007) Ties that bind: Marriage and partner choice in the Indian community in Australia in a transnational context. Identities14(4): 507–526.
15.
HartK (2007) Love by arrangement: The ambiguity of ‘spousal choice’ in a Turkish village. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute13(2): 345–362.
16.
Insook HanPLee-JayC (1995) Confucianism and the Korean family. Journal of Comparative Family Studies26(1): 117–134.
17.
IwaiNYasudaT (2011) Family Values in East Asia. Kyoto: Nakanishiya.
18.
Jinko-Doko-Kenkyu-Bu (2006) Shussei Doko Chosa (in Japanese).
19.
KalmijnM (1994) Assortative mating by cultural and economic occupational status. American Journal of Sociology100(2): 422–452.
20.
KalmijnMFlapH (2001) Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social Forces79(4): 1289–1312.
21.
KimS-W (2009) Social changes and welfare reform in South Korea: In the context of the late-coming welfare state. International Journal of Japanese Sociology18(1): 16–32.
22.
KorsonJH (1968) Residential propinquity as a factor in mate selection in an urban Muslim society. Journal of Marriage and Family30(3): 518–527.
23.
LeeGRStoneLH (1980) Mate-selection systems and criteria: Variation according to family structure. Journal of Marriage and Family42(2): 319–326.
24.
LuY-H (2001) The ‘boss’s wife’ and Taiwanese small family business,. In: BrintonMC (ed.) Women’s Working Lives in East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 263–297.
25.
MatrasJ (1973) On changing matchmaking, marriage, and fertility in Israel: Some findings, problems, and hypotheses. American Journal of Sociology79(2): 364–388.
26.
MehrotraNParishW (2001) Daughters, parents, and globalization: The case of Taiwan. In: BrintonMC (ed.) Women’s Working Lives in East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 298–322.
27.
MursteinBI (1980) Mate selection in the 1970s. Journal of Marriage and Family42(4): 777–792.
28.
NettingNS (2006) Two-lives, one partner: Indo-Canadian youth between love and arranged marriages. Journal of Comparative Family Studies37(1): 129–146.
29.
OpreaA (2005) The arranged marriage of Ana Maria Cioaba, intra-community oppression and Romani feminist ideals. European Journal of Women’s Studies12(2): 133–148.
30.
SchwartzCRMareRD (2005) Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography42(4): 621–646.
31.
StrangeH (1976) Continuity and change: Patterns of mate selection and marriage ritual in a Malay village. Journal of Marriage and Family38(3): 56–71.
32.
ThorntonAFrickeTE (1987) Social change and the family: Comparative perspectives from the West, China, and South Asia. Sociological Forum2(4): 746–779.
33.
ThorntonAChangJ-SLinH-S (1994) From arranged marriage toward love match. In: ThorntonALinH-S (eds) Social Change and the Family in Taiwan. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 148–177.
34.
TokuhiroY (2010) Marriage in Contemporary Japan. New York: Routledge.
35.
VaillantNGHarrantV (2008) Determinants of the likelihood of finding the right partner in an arranged marriage: Evidence from a French matchmaking agency. Journal of Socio-Economics37(2): 657–671.
36.
WoodEGuerinB (2006) Traditional or western marriage and dating customs: How newer migrants can learn from other Hindu Indian female immigrants. New Zealand Population Review32(1): 1–20.
37.
XiaoheXWhyteMK (1990) Love matches and arranged marriages: A Chinese replication. Journal of Marriage and Family52(3): 709–722.
38.
YiC-CHsungR-M (1994) Mate selection networks and the educational assortative mating in Taiwan: An analysis of introducer. In: YiC-C (ed.) The Social Image of Taiwan: Social Science Approaches. Taiwan: Institute of Social Sciences and Philosophy, Academia Sinica.
39.
YoshidaA (2010) Role of cultural lag in marriage decline for Japan’s boom and bust cohorts. Marriage and Family Review46(1–2): 60–78.
40.
YuW-H (2001) Family demands, gender attitudes, and married women’s labor force participation: Comparing Japan and Taiwan. In: BrintonMC (ed.) Women’s Working Lives in East Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 70–95.
41.
ZangX (2008) Gender and ethnic variation in arranged marriages in a Chinese city. Journal of Family Issues29(5): 615–638.
