What Is the Impact of Choosing One’s Spouse on Marital Satisfaction of Wives and Husbands? The Case of Arranged and Self-Choice Turkish Marriages

Abstract

The present study explored how Turkish husbands and wives in arranged or self-selected marriages differ in terms of the love, partnership, and problems components of marital satisfaction. Four hundred and fifty-six heterosexual couples participated in the study. Indeed, 33% of the marriages were identified as arranged. Marital satisfaction was measured by using the Love for Spouse, Partnership, and Problems with Partner scales (from the Marriage and Relationship Questionnaire), all of which had previously been shown to demonstrate measurement invariance across genders and cultures. According to the results of multivariate analysis of covariance (controlling for length of marriage and education), (a) spouses in self-selected marriages reported more love relative to those in arranged marriages, (b) wives reported more problems than their husbands regardless of marriage type, and (c) the wives in arranged marriages reported significantly less partnership than both the husbands and the wives in self-selected marriages. Results are discussed within a cross-cultural perspective.

Keywords

marital satisfaction arranged and self-selected marriages love partnership problems gender differences Turkish marriages

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allendorf

(2013). Schemas of marital change: From arranged marriages to eloping for love. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 453-469.

Allendorf

Ghimire

(2013). Determinants of marital quality in an arranged marriage society. Social Science Research, 42, 59-70.

Amato

P. R.

Johnson

D. R.

Booth

Rogers

S. J.

(2003). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1-22.

Applbaum

K. D.

(1995). Marriage with the proper stranger: Arranged marriage in metropolitan Japan. Ethnology, 34, 37-51.

Atalay

Kontaş

Y. M.

Beyazıt

Madenoğlu

(1993). Türk aile yapısı araştırması [Investigation of Turkish family structure] (Publication number: DPT: 2313-SPGM: 421). Ankara, Turkey: DPT Matbaası.

Bachand

L. L.

Caron

S. L.

(2001). Ties that bind: A qualitative study of happy long-term marriages. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 23, 105-121.

Ball

F. L. J.

Cowan

C. P.

(1995). Who’s got the power? Gender differences in partners’ perceptions of influence during marital problem-solving discussions. Family Process, 34, 303-321.

Blood

R. O.

(1967). Love match and arranged marriage: A Tokyo-Detroit comparison. New York, NY: Free Press.

Bovet

Raiber

Ren

Wang

Seabright

(2017, June). Parent-offspring conflict over mate choice: An experimental investigation using Chinese marriage markets. Paper presented at the Conference of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Boise, ID.

10.

Bradbury

T. N.

Fincham

F. D.

Beach

S. R. H.

(2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.

11.

Brezsnyak

Whisman

M. A.

(2004). Sexual desire and relationship functioning: The effects of marital satisfaction and power. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 30, 199-217. doi:10.1080/00926230490262393

12.

Broman

C. L.

(2005). Marital quality in Black and White marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 431-441. doi:10.1177/0192513X04272439

13.

Byrne

B. M.

Campbell

T. L.

(1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 555-574.

14.

Chung

Das Gupta

(2007). The decline of son preference in South Korea: The roles of development and public policy. Population and Development Review, 33, 757-783.

15.

Chung

Das Gupta

(2011). Factors influencing “missing girls” in South Korea. Applied Economics, 43, 3365-3378.

16.

Das Gupta

. (2014). Women’s partner choices and gender relations in India. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 13, 381-403.

17.

Demir

Fişiloğlu

(1999). Loneliness and marital adjustment of Turkish couples. Journal of Psychology, 133, 230-240.

18.

Dillon

L. M.

Nowak

Weisfeld

G. E.

Weisfeld

C. C.

Shattuck

K. S.

Imamoğlu

O. E.

. . . Shen

(2015). Sources of marital conflict in five cultures. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 1-15. doi:10.1177/147470491501300101

19.

Dion

K. L.

Dion

K. K.

(1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 53-69.

20.

Erulkar

(2013). Early marriage, marital relations and intimate partner violence in Ethiopia. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(1), 6-13. doi:10.1363/3900613

21.

Fox

G. L.

(1975). Love match and arranged marriage in a modernizing nation: Mate selection in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 180-193. doi:10.2307/351042

22.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.

23.

Gable

S. L.

Reis

H. T.

Impett

E. A.

Asher

E. R.

(2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228-245.

24.

Ghimire

D. J.

Axinn

W. G.

Yabiku

S. T.

Thornton

(2006). Social change, premarital nonfamily experience, and spouse choice in an arranged marriage society. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1181-1218.

25.

Gottman

J. M.

Notarius

C. I.

(2002). Marital research in the 20th century and a research agenda for the 21st century. Family Process, 41, 159-197.

26.

Groot

Van Den Brink

H. M.

(2002). Age and education differences in marriages and their effects on life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 153-165.

27.

Hamid

Stephenson

Rubenson

(2011). Marriage decision making, spousal communication, and reproductive health among married youth in Pakistan. Global Health Action, 4, 5079. doi:10.3402/gha.v4i0.5079

28.

Hart

(2007). Love by arrangement: The ambiguity of ‘spousal choice’ in a Turkish village. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13, 345-362.

29.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83.

30.

Hoelter

L. F.

Axinn

W. G.

Ghimire

D. J.

(2004). Social change, premarital nonfamily experiences, and marital dynamics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1131-1151.

31.

Hofstede

(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

32.

Hortaçsu

(2007). Family- versus couple-initiated marriages in Turkey: Similarities and differences over the family life cycle. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 103-116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00217.x

33.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

(1993). Değişen dünyada değişen aile-içi roller [Changing within-family roles in a changing world]. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 58-68.

34.

Imamoğlu

E. O

. (1995). Marital relationships as perceived by women and men: Some new findings. Ankara, Turkey: Aile Araştırma Kurumu.

35.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

(2000). Changing gender roles and marital satisfaction in Turkey. In Acar

Güneş-Ayata

(Eds.), Gender and identity construction: Women of Central Asia, the Caucasus and Turkey (pp. 101-116). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.

36.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

(2003). Individuation and relatedness: Not opposing but distinct and complementary. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 129, 367-402.

37.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

(2004). Family: Modern Islamic discourses: Turkey and the Caucasus. In Joseph

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and Islamic cultures: Vol. II: Family, law and politics (pp. 165-166). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.

38.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

(2009, November). Towards a balanced construction of selves and relationships. Paper presented at the Mini-Conference of the International Association for Relationship Research (IARR) on New Directions in Research on Close Relationships: Integrating Across Disciplines and Theoretical Approaches. Lawrence, KS.

39.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

Karakitapoğlu Aygün

(1999). 1970’lerden 1990’lara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farklılıkları [Value preferences from 1970’s to 1990’s: Cohort, generation, and gender differences at a Turkish university]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14(44), 1-22.

40.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

Küller

Imamoğlu

Küller

(1993). The social psychological worlds of Swedes and Turks in and around retirement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 26-41.

41.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

Selcuk

(2018). Cultural and self-related considerations in relationship well-being: With particular reference to marriage in Turkey. In Weisfeld

C. C.

Weisfeld

G. E.

Dillon

L. M.

(Eds.), The psychology of marriage: An evolutionary and cross-cultural view (pp. 89-106). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

42.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

Yasak

(1997). Dimensions of marital relationships as perceived by Turkish husbands and wives. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 211-232.

43.

Jackson

J. B.

Miller

R. B.

Oka

Henry

R. G.

(2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 105-129.

44.

Jejeebhoy

Santhya

K. G.

Acharya

Prakash

(2013). Marriage related decision making and young women’s marital relations and agency: Evidence from India. Asian Population Studies, 9, 28-49. doi:10.1080/17441730.2012.736699

45.

Kurdek

L. A.

(2005). Gender and marital satisfaction early in marriage: A growth curve approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 68-84. doi:10.1111/j.00222445.2005.00006.x

46.

Lalonde

R. N.

Hynie

Pannu

Tatla

(2004). The role of culture in interpersonal relationships: Do second generation South Asian Canadians want a traditional partner? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 503-524.

47.

Laub

J. H.

Nagin

D. S.

Sampson

R. J.

(1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63, 225-238.

48.

Lev-Wiesel

Al-Krenawi

(1999). Attitude towards marriage and marital quality: A comparison among Israeli Arabs differentiated by religion. Family Relations, 48, 51-56.

49.

Lucas

Parkhill

M. R.

Wendorf

C. A.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

Weisfeld

C. C.

Weisfeld

G. E.

Shen

(2008). Cultural and evolutionary components of marital satisfaction: A multidimensional assessment of measurement invariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 109-123.

50.

Madathil

Benshoff

J. M.

(2008). Importance of marital characteristics and marital satisfaction: A comparison of Asian Indians in arranged marriages and Americans in marriages of choice. Family Journal, 16, 222-230.

51.

Myers

J. B.

Madathil

Tingle

L. R.

(2005). Marriage satisfaction and wellness in India and the United States: A preliminary comparison of arranged marriages and marriages of choice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 83, 183-190.

52.

Penn

(2011). Arranged marriages in Western Europe: Media representations and social reality. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42, 637-650.

53.

Pillsworth

Barrett

H. C.

(2017, June). Parent-offspring conflict, arranged marriage, and female choice: A case study of the Shuar. Paper presented at the Conference of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Boise, ID.

54.

Pimentel

E. E.

(2000). Just how do I love thee? Marital relations in urban China. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 32-47.

55.

Prakash

Singh

(2014). Who marries whom? Changing mate selection preferences in urban India and emerging implications on social institutions. Population Research and Policy Review, 33, 205-227.

56.

Proulx

C. M.

Helms

H. M.

Buehler

(2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 576-593.

57.

Regan

P. C.

Lakhanpal

Anguiano

(2012). Relationship outcomes in Indian-American love-based and arranged marriages. Psychological Reports, 110, 915-924.

58.

Reis

H. T.

(2013). Relationship well-being: The central role of perceived partner responsiveness. In Hazan

Campa

(Eds.), Human bonding (pp. 283-307). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

59.

Robles

T. F.

Slatcher

R. B.

Trombello

J. M.

McGinn

M. M.

(2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 140-187.

60.

Rosenzweig

M. R.

Stark

(1989). Consumption smoothing, migration, and marriage: Evidence from rural India. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 905-926.

61.

Rubio

(2014). How love conquered marriage: Theory and evidence on the disappearance of arranged marriages (Unpublished manuscript). University of California, Merced.

62.

Russell

R. J.

Wells

P. A.

(1986). Marriage questionnaire (Unpublished booklet). University of London, England.

63.

Russell

R. J. H.

Wells

P. A.

(1993). Marriage and Relationship Questionnaire: MARQ handbook. Kent, England: Hodder & Stoughton.

64.

Russell

R. J. H.

Wells

P. A.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

(1989). Evlilik anketi [Revised Turkish marriage questionnaire] (Unpublished booklet). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

65.

Schwartz

S. A.

(2007). The relationship between love and marital satisfaction in arranged and romantic Jewish couples (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hofstra University, New York, NY.

66.

Selcuk

Gunaydin

Ong

A. D.

Almeida

D. M.

(2016). Does partner responsiveness predict hedonic and eudaimonic well-being? A 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 311-325. doi:10.1111/jomf.12272

67.

Sprecher

Sullivan

Hatfield

(1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074-1080.

68.

Stack

Eshleman

J. R.

(1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 527-536.

69.

Steil

J. M.

(1983). Marriage: An unequal partnership. In Wolman

B. B.

Stricker

(Eds.), Handbook of family and marital therapy (pp. 49-60). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

70.

Stevenson

Wolfers

(2009). The paradox of declining female happiness (Working Paper No. 14969). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969.pdf

71.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

72.

Turgut

(2011). TAYA (Turkish Family Structure Research). Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı.

73.

Türkiye’de Kır Kent Nüfusu [The Rural Population of Turkey]. (2016). Eğitim Bilişim Ağı (EBA) [Education Information Network]). Retrieved from www.eba.gov.tr/dunya/detay/4520

74.

Tynes

S. R.

(1990). Education heterogamy and marital satisfaction between spouses. Social Science Research, 19, 153-174. doi:10.1016/0049-089X(90)90019-F

75.

United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision: Highlights. Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.Pdf

76.

Weisfeld

C. C.

Weisfeld

G. E.

Dillon

L. M.

(Eds.). (2018). The psychology of marriage: An evolutionary and cross-cultural view. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

77.

Weisfeld

G. E.

Dillon

L. M.

Nowak

N. T.

Ranson

Weisfeld

C. C.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

. . .Shen

(2011, June). Conflict in marriage: Universal findings and variations in five cultures. Paper presented at the annual Human Behavior and Evolution Society Meeting, Montpellier, France.

78.

Weisfeld

G. E.

Nowak

N. T.

Lucas

Weisfeld

C. C.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

Butovskaya

. . . Parkhill

M. R.

(2011). Do women seek humorousness in men because it signals intelligence? A cross-cultural test. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24, 435-462.

79.

Weisfeld

G. E.

Wendorf

C. A.

Weisfeld

C. C.

Imamoğlu

E. O.

Shen

(2000, August). Marriage and emotional well-being in three cultures. Paper presented at the International Society for Human Ethology, Salamanca, Spain.

80.

Wendorf

C. A.

Lucas

Imamoğlu

E. O.

Weisfeld

C. C.

Weisfeld

G. E.

(2011). Marital satisfaction across three cultures: Does the number of children have an impact after accounting for other marital demographics? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 340-354.

81.

Whiteman

S. D.

McHale

S. M.

Crouter

A. C.

(2007). Longitudinal changes in marital relationships: The role of offspring’s pubertal development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1005-1020. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00427.x

82.

Whyte

(1990). Love matches and arranged marriages: A Chinese replication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 709-722. doi:10.2307/352936

83.

Yelsma

Athappilly

(1988). Marital satisfaction and communication practices: Comparisons among Indian and American couples. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 19, 37-54.

84.

Yücel

(2015). What predicts egalitarian attitudes towards marriage and children: Evidence from the European values study. Social Indicators Research, 120, 213-228.