This article explores to what extent and how individuals’ welfare state attitudes relate to their subjective assessment of the available social support. Using various sociological and sociopsychological theories the authors first provide a theoretical analysis of the micro–macro links between perceived social support (micro), social trust in support availability (macro) and public attitudes towards welfare states (micro). An empirical test based on a large cross-country dataset of 31,122 respondents in 25 European countries shows that the more welfare is provided by the state, the less of it is desired in countries where individuals have the general belief that they can rely on each other for support. Importantly, only when considered jointly, do welfare state provision and social trust in support availability become essential in explaining welfare state attitudes.
AllportG (1961) Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2.
AndressHHeienT (2001) Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the US. European Sociological Review17(4): 337–356.
3.
ArtsWGelissenJ (2001) Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter?Acta Sociologica44(4): 283–300.
4.
ArtsWHalmanLVan OorschotW (2003) The welfare state: Villain or hero of the piece? In: ArtsWHagenaarsJHalmanL (eds) The Cultural Diversity of European Unity. Leiden: Brill.
5.
BarreraMJr (1986) Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology14(4): 413–445.
6.
BeanCPapadakisE (1993) Popular support for the welfare state: A comparison between institutional regimes. Journal of Public Policy13(3): 227–254.
7.
BerggrenNJordahlH (2006) Free to trust: Economic freedom and social capital. Kyklos59(2): 141–169.
8.
BlekesauneMQuadagnoJ (2003) Public attitudes toward welfare state politics: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review19(5): 415–427.
9.
BlombergHKrollC (1999) Do structural contexts matter? Macro-sociological factors and popular attitudes towards public welfare services. Acta Sociologica42(4): 300–318.
10.
CohenSUnderwoodLGottliebB (2000) Social Support Measurement and Intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
CookF (1979) Who Should be Helped: Public Support for Social Services. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
CrespiI (1997) The Public Opinion Process: How the People Speak. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
DelheyJNewtonK (2003) Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies5(2): 93–137.
14.
De SwaanA (1988) In Care of the State. Amsterdam: Bakker.
15.
DiPreteTForristalJ (1994) Multilevel models: Methods and substance. Annual Review of Sociology20: 331–357.
16.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
EtzioniA (1995) The Spirit of Community. London: Fontana Books.
18.
FidrmucJGërxhaniK (2008) Mind the gap: Social capital, East and West!Journal of Comparative Economics36(2): 264–286.
19.
FraileMFerrerM (2005) Explaining the determinants of public support for cuts in unemployment spending across OECD countries. International Sociology20(4): 459–481.
20.
FukuyamaF (2001) Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly22(1): 7–20.
21.
GalbraithJ (1992) The Culture of Contentment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
GërxhaniK (2004) Tax evasion in transition: Outcome of an institutional clash? Testing Feige’s conjecture in Albania. European Economic Review48(4): 729–745.
24.
HaganJMacMillanRWheatonB (1996) New kid in town: Social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children. American Sociological Review61: 368–85.
25.
HallaMLacknerMSchneiderF (2010) An empirical analysis of the dynamics of the welfare state: The case of benefit morale. Kyklos63(1): 55–74.
26.
HalmanL (2001) The European Values Study: 3rd Wave. Tilburg: EVS/WORC.
27.
HasenfeldYRaffertyJ (1989) The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state. Social Forces64(4): 1027–1048.
28.
HeinemannF (2008) Is the welfare state self-destructive? A study of government benefit morale. Kyklos61(2): 237–257.
29.
JægerM (2006) Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: The regime hypothesis revisited. European Sociological Review22(2): 157–170.
30.
KääriäinenJLehtonenH (2006) The variety of social capital in welfare state regimes: A comparative study of 21 countries. European Societies8(1): 27–57.
31.
KluegelJSmithE (1986) Beliefs about Inequality: American’s Views of What is and What Ought to be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
32.
KosterF (2007) Globalization, social structure and the willingness to help others: A multilevel analysis across 26 countries. European Sociological Review23(4): 537–551.
33.
KreftIDe LeeuwJAikenL (1995) The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research30(1): 1–22.
34.
KuhnleSAlestaloM (2000) Introduction: Growth, adjustments and survival of European welfare states. In: KuhnleS (ed.) Survival of the European Welfare State. London: Routledge, pp. 3–18.
35.
LarsenC (2008) The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: How welfare regimes influence public support. Comparative Political Studies41(2): 145–168.
36.
LetkiN (2006) Investigating the roots of civic morality: Trust, social capital, and institutional performance. Political Behavior28(3): 305–325.
37.
Lewin-EpsteinNKaplanALevanonA (2003) Distributive justice and attitudes toward the welfare state. Social Justice Research16(1): 1–27.
38.
LinN (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
LinNDeanA (1984). Social support and depression. A panel study. Social Psychiatry19: 83–91.
40.
LincolnK (2007) Social support. In: RitzerG (ed.) Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology Online. Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
LipsmeyerCNordstromT (2003) East versus West: Comparing political attitudes and welfare preferences across European societies. Journal of European Public Policy10(3): 339–364.
42.
LockhartC (2001) Protecting the Elderly: How Culture Shapes Social Policy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
43.
MauS (2004) Welfare regimes and the norms of social exchange. Current Sociology52(1): 53–74.
44.
NarayanDCassidyM (2001) A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: Development and validation of a social capital inventory. Current Sociology49(2): 59–102.
45.
NewtonK (2001) Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review22(2): 201–214.
46.
OstromE (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
PichlerFWallaceC (2007) Patterns of formal and informal social capital in Europe. European Sociological Review23(3): 423–435.
48.
PierceGSarasonBSarasonI (1997) Handbook of Social Support and the Family. New York: Plenum Press.
49.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
50.
RothsteinB (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
RothsteinB (2001) Social capital in the social democratic welfare state. Politics and Society29(2): 207–241.
52.
ScheepersPTen GrotenhuisMGelissenJ (2003) Welfare states and dimensions of social capital: Cross-national comparisons of social contacts in European countries. European Societies4(2): 185–207.
53.
ScruggsL (2004) Welfare state entitlements data set: a comparative institutional analysis of eighteen welfare states. Version 11.
54.
ShapiroRYoungJ (1989) Public opinion and the welfare state: The US in comparative perspective. Political Science Quarterly104(1): 59–89.
55.
SnijdersTBoskerR (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
56.
StansfeldS (2002) Review of Cohen, Underwood, Gottlieb (2000). Social Support Measurement and Intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
SvallforsS (1997) Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: a comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review13(3): 283–304.
58.
SzreterS (2002) The state of social capital: Bringing back in power, politics, and history. Theory and Society31(5): 573–621.
59.
Taylor-GoobyP (1985) Public Opinion, Ideology and State Welfare. London: Routledge.
60.
UslanerEM (2000) Producing and consuming trust. Political Science Quarterly115(4): 569–590.
61.
Van OorschotW (2000a) Why pay for welfare? A sociological analysis of reasons for welfare solidarity. The Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences36(1): 15–36.
62.
Van OorschotW (2000b) Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy and Politics28(1): 33–49.
63.
Van OorschotWArtsW (2005) The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy15(1): 5–26.
64.
Van OorschotWFinsveenE (2009) The welfare state and social capital inequality. European Societies11(2): 189–210.
65.
Van OorschotWArtsWGelissenJ (2006) Social capital in Europe: Measurement and social and regional distribution of a multifaceted phenomenon. Acta Sociologica49(2): 149–167
66.
WilenskyH (1975) The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditure. Berkeley: University of California Press.
67.
WlezienC (1995) The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science39(4): 981–1000.
