This article contributes to international debates about public-area streetscape video surveillance by assessing the Canadian policy context. Based on findings from an ongoing empirical investigation, the authors argue that Canada’s pragmatic policy framework enables surveillance advocates and adversaries to selectively endorse privacy protection principles institutionalized in best practice protocols. The authors explain their findings in relation to the international literature on video surveillance policy diffusion and privacy.
BennettC (2003) The Privacy Commissioner of Canada: Multiple roles, diverse expectations and structural dilemmas. Canadian Public Administration46(2): 218–242.
2.
BennettCBayleyR (2005) Video surveillance and privacy protection law in Canada. In: NouwtSde VriesBPrinsC (eds) Reasonable Expectations of Privacy? Eleven Country Reports on Camera Surveillance and Workplace Surveillance. The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 61–90.
3.
BennettCRaabC (2006) The Governance of Privacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BroedersD (2007) The new digital border of Europe: EU databases and the surveillance of irregular migrants. International Sociology22(1): 71–92.
5.
CavoukianA (1998) Video surveillance: The privacy implications. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, IPC Practices #10. Toronto.
6.
CavoukianA (2002) Letter from Ann Cavoukian, Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, to Michelle Smibert, FOI Co-Ordinator, City of London. 26September (released by the City of London’s manager of records and information services).
7.
City of London Steering Management Group. (2001) Downtown surveillance CCTV camera program: Steering Management Group terms of reference. 9August. City of London, ON.
8.
ColemanR (2006) Confronting the hegemony of vision: State, space, and urban crime prevention. In: BartonACorteenCScottDWhyteD (eds) Expanding the Criminological Imagination: Critical Readings in Criminology. Cullompton: Willan, 38–64.
9.
ColemanRSimJ (2000) ‘You’ll never walk alone’: CCTV surveillance, order and neo-liberal rule in Liverpool city centre. British Journal of Sociology51(4): 623–639.
10.
Community Contract and Aboriginal Policing Services. (2004) Analysis of video surveillance guidelines proposed by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. Operational Policy Section, 25June (document released by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada).
11.
FusseyP (2007) New Labour and new surveillance: Theoretical and political ramifications of CCTV implementation in the UK. Surveillance and Society2(3): 251–269.
12.
FyfeNBannisterJ (1996) City watching: Closed circuit television surveillance in public spaces. Area28(1): 37–46.
13.
FyfeNBannisterJ (1998) The ‘eyes upon the street’: Closed circuit television surveillance and the city. In: FyfeN (ed.) Images of the Street: Planning, Identity and Control in Public Space. London: Routledge, 254–267.
14.
GooldB (2004) CCTV and Policing. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.
15.
GrasM (2004) The legal regulation of CCTV in Europe. Surveillance and Society2(3): 216–229.
16.
HaggertyK (2009) Methodology as a knife fight: The process, politics and paradox of evaluating surveillance. Critical Criminology17(4): 277–291.
17.
HaggertyKEricsonR (2000) The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology51(4): 605–622.
18.
HierSP (2010) Panoptic Dreams: Streetscape Video Surveillance in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
19.
HierSLyonD (2004) Surveillance, technology and the management of risk. International Sociology19(2): 131–134.
20.
HierSGreenbergJWalbyKLettD (2007) Media, communication, and the establishment of public camera surveillance in Canada. Media, Culture, and Society29(5): 727–751.
21.
LabréqueA (1992) Final investigation report: La Ligue des droits et libertés v. La Ville de Sherbrooke (November: File # 91 07 84). Commission d’accès à l’information, Quebec.
22.
Lions Club. (2002) Fact sheet. Document released by Greater Sudbury Police Force and Sudbury Metro Centre.
23.
LippertR (2009) Signs of the surveillant assemblage: Privacy regulation, urban CCTV and governmentality. Social and Legal Studies18(4): 505–522.
24.
London Free Press. (1999) This week’s debate: Should surveillance cameras be located downtown. Debates and decisions section, 12June.
25.
McCahillM (2002) The Surveillance Web: The Rise of CCTV in an English City. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
26.
MaguireM (1999) Restraining big brother? The regulation of surveillance in England and Wales. In: NorrisCArmstrongGMoranJ (eds) Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television and Social Control. Aldershot: Ashgate, 264–279.
27.
MorseP (2002) Video camera public hearings find opposition to proposal. Hamilton Spectator, 6April, p. A03.
28.
Murakami WoodD (2009) The ‘surveillance society’: Questions of history, place and culture. European Journal of Criminology44(2): 179–194.
29.
NorrisCArmstrongG (1999) The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV. Oxford and New York: Berg.
30.
NorrisCMcCahillMWoodD (2004) The growth of CCTV: A global perspective on the international diffusion of video surveillance in publicly accessible space. Surveillance and Society2(3): 110–135.
31.
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. (2004) Proposed project on video surveillance. From BK Stewart, 22March. Ottawa, ON (document released by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada).
32.
PolaniO (2000) Evaluation of the Lions Eye in the Sky Video Monitoring Project. Commissioned report, KPMG.
33.
RadwanskiG (2001) Privacy commissioners’ findings on video surveillance by RCMP in Kelowna. Letter from Commissioner Radwanski to Commissioner Loukidelis, 4October (document released by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada).
34.
Royal Canadian Mounted Police. (2003) Assessment. RCMP Memorandum, 17September (document released by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada).
35.
TaylorN (2002) State surveillance and the right to privacy. Surveillance and Society1(1): 66–85.
36.
Video Monitoring Advisory Committee. (1997) Committee minutes. 26August. Sudbury Metro Centre, ON.
37.
WalbyK (2006) Little England: The rise of open-street closed-circuit television surveillance in Canada. Surveillance and Society4(1/2): 29–51.
38.
WebsterW (1996) Closed circuit television and governance: The eve of a surveillance age. Information Infrastructure and Policy5(4): 253–263.
39.
WebsterW (2004) The diffusion, regulation, and governance of closed-circuit television in the UK. Surveillance and Society2(2/3): 230–250.
40.
WebsterW (2009) CCTV policy in the UK: Reconsidering the evidence base. Surveillance and Society6(1): 10–22.
41.
WelshBFarringtonD (2009) Making Public Places Safer: Surveillance and Crime Prevention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
