Recent US media reports about a new trend in returning home among married women with children, especially college-educated ones, have raised questions about the well-documented trends of increasing labor force participation among married women with young and minor children in the US. Using both cohort and period data from the 1994 and 2002 General Social Surveys, this study examines whether there is a reverse trend in staying home among married women with young children under the age of six and those with school-age children aged six to 17. Results of trend analyses by cohort and by period and multinomial logistic regression analysis indicate that there is no reverse trend in staying home among married women with young children as a whole, but the evidence does point to a new trend in staying home among married women with young children and a bachelor's or higher degree. For married women with school-age children as a whole and those with a bachelor's or higher degree, there appears to be mostly statistically insignificant changes in staying home across time periods and among the new generation. The study also finds declines in stay-home rates from 1994 to 2002 especially among less-educated, low-income or African-American married women with young children and to a less extent those with school-age children. The implications of the findings are discussed.
ABC News (2006) ` "Mommy Wars": To Work or Stay at Home?', 22 February.
2.
Arendell, T. (2000) `Conceiving and Investigating Motherhood: The Decade's Scholarship', Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 1192-207.
3.
Belkin, L. (2003) `The Opt-Out Revolution', The New York Times Magazine42 (26 October).
4.
Bowen, W.G. and Finegan, T.A. (1969) The Economics of Labor Force Participation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Brenner, M. (2001) `Not Their Mothers' Choices', Newsweek138(7): 48-9.
6.
Broberg, A.G. and Hwang, C.P. (1992) `The Shaping of Child-Care Policies', in M. Lamb et al. (eds) Child Care in Context . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
7.
Cain, G.G. (1966) Married Women in the Labor Force. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
CBS News (2003) `More Stay-at-home Moms', 24 October.
9.
CBS News (2004) `Staying at Home', 24 October.
10.
Crittenden, A. (2001) The Price of Motherhood: Why the Most Important Job in the World is Still the Least Valued. New York: Metropolitan Books.
11.
Desai, S. and Waite, L. (1991) `Women's Employment during Pregnancy and after the First Birth: Occupational Characteristics and Work Commitment', American Sociological Review56: 551-66.
12.
Friedan, B. (1981) The Second Stage. New York: Summit Books.
13.
Golding, C. (1990) Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Gornick, J.C. and Meyers, M.K. (2003) Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
Herring, C. and Wilson-Sadberry, K.R. (1993) `Preference or Necessity? Changing Work Roles of Black and White Women, 1973-1990', Journal of Marriage and the Family55(2): 314-25.
16.
Hertz, R. (1997) `A Typology of Approaches to Child Care', Journal of Family Issues18(4): 355-85.
17.
Hewlett, S. (1986) A Lesser Life. New York: William Morrow and Co.
18.
Hill, R. and Stafford, F. (1974) `Allocation of Time to Preschool Children and Educational Opportunity', Journal of Human Resources9: 323-41.
19.
Leibowitz, A. (1974) `Education and the Allocation of Women's Time' , in T. Juster (ed.) Education, Income, and Human Behavior, pp. 171-97. New York: New York University Press.
20.
Leibowitz, A. and Klerman, J. (1995) `Explaining Changes in Married Women's Employment over Time', Demography32(3): 365-78.
21.
Leibowitz, A., Klerman, J. and Waite, L. (1992) `Employment of New Mothers and Child Care Choice: Differences by Children's Age', Journal of Human Resources27(1): 112-32.
22.
Lloyd, C. B., Andrews, E. S. and Gilroy, C. L., eds (1979) Women in the Labor Market. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
McLaughlin, S. (1982) `Differential Patterns of Female Labor-Force Participation Surrounding the First Birth', Journal of Marriage and the Family44: 407-20.
24.
Matthews, G. (1992) The Rise of Public Woman: Woman's Power and Woman's Place in the United States, 1630-1970. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Mincer, J. (1962) Labor Force Participation of Married Women: A Study of Labor Supply. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Moen, P. (2003) It's About Time: Couples and Careers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Mott, F.L. (1978) Women, Work, and Family: Dimensions of Change in American Society. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
28.
NORC (National Opinion Research Center) (2003 ) General Social Surveys, 1972-2002: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, NORC.
29.
Oppenheimer, V. (1970) The Female Labor Force in the United States. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.
30.
Ortiz, V. and Fennelly, K. (1988) `Early Childbearing and Employment among Young Mexican Origin, Black, and White Women', Social Science Quarterly11: 21-7.
31.
Rosen, R. (2002) The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America. New YorkPenguinPutnam.
32.
Rosenbaum, E. and Gilbertson, G. (1995) `Mothers' Labor Force Participation in New York City: A Reappraisal of the Influence of Household Extension', Journal of Marriage and the Family57(1): 243-49.
33.
Rosenwein, R. (2002) `The Baby Sabbatical', American Demographics 24 (February): 36-9.
34.
Sapiro, V. (1999) Women in American Society, 4th edn. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
35.
Smith, J. and Ward, M.P. (1984) `Women's Wages and Work in the Twentieth Century' , RAND, R-3119-NICHD, Santa Monica.
36.
Spain, D. and Bianchi, S.M. (1996) Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment among American Women. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37.
Stegelin, D. and Frankel, J. (1997) `Families of Employed Mothers in the United States' , in J. Frankel (ed.) Families of Employed Mothers: An International Perspective, pp. 237-61. New York: Garland Publishing.
38.
Story, L. (2005) `Many Women at Elite Colleges Set Career Path to Motherhood', The New York Times 20 September.
39.
Sweet, J.A. (1973) Women in the Labor Force. New York: Seminar Press.
40.
Thornton, A. (1989) `Changing Attitudes toward Family Issues in the United States', Journal of Marriage and the Family51: 873-93.
41.
Tienda, M. and Glass, J. (1985) `Household Structure and Labor Force Participation of Black, Hispanic, and White Mothers', Demography22(3): 381-94.
42.
US Bureau of the Census (various years) Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
43.
US Bureau of the Census (2005) Fertility of American Women: June 2004. Washington, DC : US Census Bureau.
44.
Waite, L. (1976) `Working Wives: 1940-1960', American Sociological Review41: 65-80.
45.
Waite, L. (1980) `Working Wives and the Family Life Cycle', American Journal of Sociology86: 272-94.
46.
Waldman, E. (1983) `Labor Force Statistics from a Family Perspective' , Monthly Labor Review106: 16-20.
47.
Wallis, C. (2004) `The Case for Staying Home: Why More Young Moms Are Opting out of the Rat Race', Time 22 March: 50-9.
48.
Williams, J., Manvell, J. and Bornstein, S. (2006) `Opt out' or Pushed out? How the Press Covers Work/Family Conflict. San Francisco: University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Center for Work Life Law.
49.
Yoon, Y. and Waite, L. (1994) `Converging Employment Patterns of Black, White, and Hispanic Women: Return to Work after First Birth', Journal of Marriage and the Family56(1): 209-17.
