Amsterdam, A.G. and Bruner, J. (2001) Minding the Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Arthurs, H. (1985) Without the Law: Administrative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Nineteenth Century England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
3.
Blumenthal, J. (2002) `Law and Social Science in the Twenty-First Century' , Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal12: 1—53.
4.
Caldeira, G.A. (1987) ` Public Opinion and the US SupremeCourt : FDR's Court-Packing Plan', American Political Science Review84(1): 1139—53.
5.
Caldeira, G.A. (1995) ` The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support ', American Political Science Review89: 356—76.
6.
Caldeira, G.A. and Gibson, J. (1992) `The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court' , American Journal of Political Science36: 635—64.
7.
Choudhry, S. , ed. (2006) The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press .
8.
Ellickson, R. (1991) Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Ellickson, R. (2001a) `The Evolution of Social Norms: A Perspective from the Legal Academy', in M. Hechter and K. D. Opp (eds) Social Norms , pp. 35—75. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
Ellickson, R. (2001b) ` The Market for Social Norms ', American Law and Economics Review3: 1—49.
11.
Elster, J. (2000) Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment and Constraints. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press .
12.
Feeley, M. (1983) Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail . New York: Basic Books.
13.
Feeley, M. and Rubin, E. (1998) Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How Courts Reformed America's Prisons. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press .
14.
Friedman, L.M. (1998) The Republic of Choice: Law, Authority, and Culture . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Friedman L.M. (1999) The Horizontal Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
Friedman L.M. (2002) American Law in the 20th Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Kagan, R. (1995) `What Socio-Legal Scholars Should Do When There is Too Much Law to Study' , Journal of Law and Society22(1): 140—8.
18.
Kaplan, C.S. (2000) ` French Nazi Memorabilia Case Presents Jurisdiction Dilemma ', Cyber Law Journal at: partners.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/08/cyber/cyberlaw/11law.html (accessed 26 September 2007).
19.
Lessig, L. (2000) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Lipson, L. and Wheeler, S. , eds (1986) Law and the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
Luhmann, N. (1982) `Communication about Law in Action Systems' in K. Knorr-Cetina and A. Cicourel (eds) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward and Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, pp. 234—56. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
22.
Luhmann, N. (1992) `Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System' , Cardozo Law Review13: 1419—41.
23.
Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems, trans. J. Bednarz with D. Baecker . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
Nelken, D. , ed. (1996) Law as Communication. Aldershot and Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.
25.
Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2006) `Technology's Impact: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Accountability in Mediation' , Harvard Negotiation Law Review11: 253—93.
26.
Reichman, A. (forthcoming) ` The Dimensions of Law: Judicial Craft, its Public Perception, and the Role of the Scholar ', California Law Review.
27.
Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. , eds (2000) Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Scheiber, H.N. (1980) `Federalism and Legal Process: Historical and Contemporary Analysis of the American System' , Law and Society Review14: 663—722.
29.
Scheiber, H.N. (1981) `American Constitutional History and the New Legal History: Complementary Themes in Two Modes' , Journal of American History68: 337—50.
30.
Scheiber, H.N. (2002) `Taking Responsibility: Moral and Historical Perspectives on the Japanese War-Reparations Issues' , Berkeley Journal of International Law20: 233—49.
31.
Scheiber, H.N. (2003) `Property Rights Versus “Public Necessity”: A Perspective on Emergency Powers and the Supreme Court' , Journal of Supreme Court History28: 339—69.
32.
Selznick, P. (1992) The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley and Los Angeles : University of California Press.
33.
Sen, A. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
34.
Sen, A. (1973) On Economic Inequality. New York: Norton.
35.
Sen, A. (1982) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlements and Deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
36.
Slaughter, A.M. (2004) A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Slaughter, A. M. , Stone Sweet, A. and Weiler, J. H. H. , eds (1998) The European Court and National Courts, Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
38.
Sniderman, P. , Fletcher, J.F. , Russell, P. and Tetlock, P.E. (1996) The Clash of Rights: Liberty, Equality, and Legitimacy in Pluralist Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
Teitel, R.G. (2000) Transitional Justice. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Teubner, G. (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System, trans. A. Bankowska and R. Adler. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
