Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey–Lower Limb (LSIDS-L) in patients with lower extremity lymphedema
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey–Lower Limb (LSIDS-L) in patients with lower extremity lymphedema
Effective management of lower extremity lymphedema requires its recognition as a distinct clinical entity. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey–Lower Limb (LSIDS-L), a tool designed to assess both the severity and distress of symptoms in patients with lower limb lymphedema.
Aims
To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey–Lower Limb (LSIDS-L) in patients with lower extremity lymphedema.
Study design
Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Methods
The LSIDS-L was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish using the forward-backward translation method. The final version was administered to 155 patients alongside the Lymphoedema Quality of Life Questionnaire–Leg (LYMQOL-Leg). Reliability was assessed using a 7-days test-retest approach. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic data. Construct validity was evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, while internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed via Cronbach’s alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively.
Results
The questionnaire demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability with ICC1k = 0.9989 and r = 0.9970. Internal consistency was also high, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.9180 and a standardized alpha of 0.9145, indicating strong coherence among items.
Conclusion
The Turkish version of the LSIDS-L (LSIDS-L-TR) is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing symptom intensity and distress in patients with lower extremity lymphedema. It offers a comprehensive tool for use in both clinical practice and research settings.
Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2023 consensus document of the international society of lymphology. Lymphology2023; 56(4): 133–151.
2.
RidnerSH (ed) Pathophysiology of lymphedema. Seminars in oncology nursing. Elsevier, 2013.
3.
DeanSMValentiEHockK, et al.The clinical characteristics of lower extremity lymphedema in 440 patients. J Vasc Surg: Venous Lymphat Disord2020; 8(5): 851–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.11.014
4.
NormanSALocalioARPotashnikSL, et al.Lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: incidence, degree, time course, treatment, and symptoms. J Clin Oncol2009; 27(3): 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9291
5.
BeesleyVJandaMEakinE, et al.Lymphedema after gynecological cancer treatment: prevalence, correlates, and supportive care needs. Cancer2007; 109(12): 2607–2614. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22684
6.
KerchnerKFleischerAYosipovitchG. Lower extremity lymphedema: update: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment guidelines. J Am Acad Dermatol2008; 59(2): 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.04.013
7.
DunbergerGLindquistHWaldenströmA-C, et al.Lower limb lymphedema in gynecological cancer survivors—effect on daily life functioning. Support Care Cancer2013; 21(11): 3063–3070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1879-3
8.
BrownJCLinLLSegalS, et al.Physical activity, daily walking, and lower limb lymphedema associate with physical function among uterine cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer2014; 22(11): 3017–3025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2306-0
9.
DengJRadinaEFuMR, et al.Self‐care status, symptom burden, and reported infections in individuals with lower‐extremity primary lymphedema. J Nurs Scholarsh2015; 47(2): 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12117
10.
FinnaneAHayesSCObermairA, et al.Quality of life of women with lower-limb lymphedema following gynecological cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res2011; 11(3): 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.11.30
11.
NovackovaMHalaskaMJRobovaH, et al.A prospective study in detection of lower-limb lymphedema and evaluation of quality of life after vulvar cancer surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer2012; 22(6): 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e31825866d0
12.
SymvoulakisEKAnyfantakisDILionisC. Primary lower limb lymphedema: a focus on its functional, social and emotional impact. Int J Med Sci2010; 7(6): 353–357. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.7.353
13.
Sahbaz-PirincciCCihanEDüzlü-ÖztürkÜ, et al.Comparing complex decongestive therapy in patients with lymphedema of different causes by measuring: extremity volume, quality of life, and functionality. Cir Cir2024; 92(3): 354–361. https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.23000330
14.
KatzEDuganNLCohnJC, et al.Weight lifting in patients with lower-extremity lymphedema secondary to cancer: a pilot and feasibility study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2010; 91(7): 1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.021
15.
TümkayaMNSevenM (eds) Interventions for prevention and management of gynecological cancer-related lower limb lymphedema: a systematic scoping review. Seminars in Oncology Nursing. Elsevier, 2025.
16.
HuggenbergerKWagnerSLehmannS, et al.Health and quality of life in patients with primary and secondary lymphedema of the lower extremity. Vasa2015; 44(2): 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000419
17.
DengJRidnerSHMurphyBA, et al.Preliminary development of a lymphedema symptom assessment scale for patients with head and neck cancer. Support Care Cancer2012; 20(8): 1911–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1294-6
18.
CemalYJewellSAlbornozCR, et al.Systematic review of quality of life and patient reported outcomes in patients with oncologic related lower extremity lymphedema. Lymphatic Res Biol2013; 11(1): 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2012.0015
19.
YostKJChevilleALWeaverAL, et al.Development and validation of a self-report lower-extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire in women. Phys Ther2013; 93(5): 694–703. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120088
20.
CarterJRavivLAppolloK, et al.A pilot study using the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) as a clinical care tool to identify lower extremity lymphedema in gynecologic cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol2010; 117(2): 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.022
21.
DevoogdtNDe GroefAHendrickxA, et al.Lymphoedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire for lower limb lymphoedema (lymph-ICF-LL): reliability and validity. Phys Ther2014; 94(5): 705–721. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130285
22.
SaitoTUnnoNYamamotoN, et al.Low lymphatic pumping pressure in the legs is associated with leg edema and lower quality of life in healthy volunteers. Lymphatic Res Biol2015; 13(2): 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2014.0015
23.
RidnerSHDietrichMS. Development and validation of the lymphedema symptom and intensity survey-arm. Support Care Cancer2015; 23(10): 3103–3112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2684-y
24.
RidnerSHDoersamJKStolldorfDP, et al.Development and validation of the lymphedema symptom intensity and distress survey-lower limb. Lymphatic Res Biol2018; 16(6): 538–546. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2017.0069
25.
BowmanCPiedalueK-ABaydounM, et al.The quality of life and psychosocial implications of cancer-related lower-extremity lymphedema: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Med2020; 9(10): 3200. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103200
26.
IuchiTDaiMSanadaH, et al.Associations between the treatments and outcomes of patients with upper and lower lymphoedema in Japan: a cross-sectional observational study. Int J Nurs Stud2015; 52(5): 913–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.01.011
27.
BormanPYamanADenizliM, et al.The reliability and validity of lymphedema quality of life questionnaire-leg in Turkish patients with lower limb lymphedema. Lymphatic Res Biol2020; 18(1): 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2018.0048
28.
KooTKLiMY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropract Med2016; 15(2): 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
29.
TrabelsiKSaifZDrillerMW, et al.Evaluating the reliability of the athlete sleep behavior questionnaire (ASBQ): a meta-analysis of Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2024; 16(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00787-0
